|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,753
Expert
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,753 |
Does anyone here have experience working with BIAB produced WMA files inside of a DAW? I've always exported BIAB to .WAV files and worked with those inside of Reaper. I don't think the sound quality will be any different since they basically start out as WMA (I think) in BIAB. So, why not keep them that way to save hard drive space and "maybe" some processing power when I have multiple tracks in Reaper.
My main concerns are;
1. Will my plugins behave and sound correct?
2. Will it actually save hard dive space and/or processing power?
3. My live instrument and voice recordings are going in as .WAV. So, when I mix down and render to a stereo track would I keep the whole thing as a WMA?
4. Should I just stick with exporting from BIAB in the .wav format?
Does the noise in your head bother me ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,480
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,480 |
I think your real decision is whether to let BiaB export as wav or have Reaper import it to wav.
The only difference is which one does the conversion.
Either way I think you end up with a wav file(s) in Reaper as far as size goes.
Reaper should adjust any imported audio to the project settings (most likely wav) ..
so really 'six of one VS half dozen of the other' in my experience.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,992
PG Music Staff
|
|
PG Music Staff
Joined: Jun 2017
Posts: 2,992 |
This is just my own suggestion, but I would personally render and work with a .WAV format when it comes to working within a DAW. There are "pros" and "cons" to using both. WMA is a Microsoft exclusive format, and it's not supported across the board by all media players and operating systems (considering it's Microsoft only). If you are working in a Windows environment, there isn't any harm in working with WMA files at all, and it will help you save space as .WAV files are indeed quite large. WAV files are an uncompressed format, which means they are exact copies of the original source audio. Since they're uncompressed, they do take up extra space that a compressed format wouldn't.
We hope this helps!
Cheers,
Ember
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,733
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,733 |
Just export the files from BB/RB as waves. Problem solved.
WMA is a compressed format so when you render a wave, you're not going to get the "missing" data restored but you should not see a decrease either.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,110
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,110 |
Does anyone here have experience working with BIAB produced WMA files inside of a DAW? I've always exported BIAB to .WAV files and worked with those inside of Reaper. I don't think the sound quality will be any different since they basically start out as WMA (I think) in BIAB. So, why not keep them that way to save hard drive space and "maybe" some processing power when I have multiple tracks in Reaper.
My main concerns are;
1. Will my plugins behave and sound correct?
2. Will it actually save hard dive space and/or processing power?
3. My live instrument and voice recordings are going in as .WAV. So, when I mix down and render to a stereo track would I keep the whole thing as a WMA?
4. Should I just stick with exporting from BIAB in the .wav format? Yes, you can use Biab Track Injector for REAPER if you want to work directly with the wma use version from 6.57. You can also batch encode the wma/wav source files into any format that Reaper supports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,986
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,986 |
As far as I can tell, Cakewalk by Bandlab does not support importing WMA files. According to the import module Cakewalk imports WAV or CD tracks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,497
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,497 |
Hi, I can use the BIAB wav files directly in mixcraft !
mvh Dani
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,973
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 1,973 |
We should be able to import BIAB .wav files into any DAW.
Since WMA files are compressed, what's the point in using them at all?
BIAB 2025 Audiophile Mac
24Core/60CoreGPU M2 MacStudioUltra/8TB/192GB Sequoia, M1 MBAir, 2012 MBP
Digital Performer11, LogicPro, Finale27/Dorico/Encore/SmartScorePro64/Notion6 /Overture5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,733
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,733 |
So as I understand it..... the files are WMA in the BB folders that it loads when you load the song. So they are already in a "less than a WAV" compressed format. You're working with and listening to the WMA compressed files in your program.
When you are ready to export, you export it in a WAV format since that is pretty much industry standard. Keep in mind however, that you are simply encoding the WMA compressed file as a WAV file. It doesn't magically restore the missing data. You're simply encoding what data that remains in the WMA compressed format, into a WAV file format.
Unless you have the audiophile version and you actually have WAV files to start, you are working with a loss of data from the original.
But it still sounds mighty fine.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,592
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,592 |
i wish biab and rb could export to flac (or wavpak) so i could go all flac (or wavpk) in reaper.
(i would be ecstatic if bb//rb went all flac as an option.)
ive recorded thousands of flac traks in reaps with not one prob ever including using the pg dx plug ins i like as well as loads of other vst plug ins. i love flac.
i hope one day the industry moves on from wav format.
mebe i'll get 'flac' over the above…lmao.
all i can relate are my experiences including no lag/probs….and pc 'agility' i cant quantify.
reaper was doing flac way way back years ago.
one reason i love reaps.
alternatively i dont know if a all wma recording//playback…reaps//bb//rb combo studio would work…cos i dont know enough about how wma works.
but certainly a all lossless studio for recording//playback//trak generation certainly i find an interesting idea whether flac or other lossless format.
and before someone says i'm 'bonkers' to record n' mix using flac…ive tested the results with all sorts of people over the years from music aficianados to the normal everyday consumer.
i would be a happy likkle piglet if pg shipped the rt's etc etc as flac instead of wma.
om
my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..) https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs(90 songs created useing bb/rb) (lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,986
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,986 |
justanoldmuso,
While Reaper fully supports the use of FLAC, it is one of the few DAWs that fully supports FLAC. Mixcraft offers "partial support" whatever that means. ProTools uses a conversion tool to convert from FLAC to WAV (I think). That's all I could find while researching what DAWs support FLAC.
With so little support for FLAC, why should PG Music support it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,592
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,592 |
Jim.
Re..why pg might support flac (or another lossless format eg wavpak)
a very good question jim.
my answer as follows.
1..
i think one needs to work a lot with a lossless format to really appreciate it.its not just storage savings, but download time savings…..which the latter i think will become very important as pg offers every year more and more 'content'..
eg real traks as one example…..also imagine if biab over time comes with a massive 'content library' covering not just a huge library of styles but also a huge library of demo songs and real traks. now add in the fact that biab is a world wide product which will entice musos world wide from different countries each often with their own unique and ethnic music creation needs…do you see the implications ?
lets take one example…when i was a kid growing up in various countries in the world i heard all sorts of interesting types of music styles depending the country my parents were working in. i was exposed to all sorts of music.
to support my thesis…already one sees new users posting on the forums often a need for styles and instrument content related to the country they live in.
i have no inside info…but i suspect internally pg sometimes discusses the implications of an ever expanding library of content eg the time to download such a huge library of content for users that might not have the fastest eg fibre internet etc. eg what happens when pg offers 5 times the song demos in the stylepicker compared to today ?
2..
as an example lets consider the implications for one pg product..realband (rb).
would rb be more 'nimble' if it used flac ? lets look at possible benefits mate.
..would high trak count SEQ's load faster and save faster ?
..what about editing ? would copies and moves and complex edits be faster and more fluid ?
..would rb operate more nimbly on even the lowest power or old pc ?
(not everyone can afford i7's//i9's and ryzens…there are many countries whose citizens, sadly, cant afford high end pc's…but would like to create songs all the same. )
in summary all i would suggest is i suspect rb would be more nimble for some low powered pc users.
of course only the pg coders can answer as to, if in fact, rb would be more nimble.
i have only my reaper experience to go on. 'more fluid' is ive found on lower power pc's viz wav.
jim….if you feel i'm 'talking rubbish'...take the clunkiest old pc (like many people have in the world)...install reaps and do a all wav song for 30 traks, then repeat recording and playing etc using flac for 30 traks. and assess for yourself whether running a lossless format like flac realises a more 'nimble experience' for the user. then repeat with high trak counts and see if wav is still nimble compared to wav.
i suspect you will see more and more the difference as the trak count goes higher and higher.
have a great xmas and happy creative 2023.
om
Last edited by justanoldmuso; 12/16/22 12:07 PM.
my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..) https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs(90 songs created useing bb/rb) (lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,110
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,110 |
i wish biab and rb could export to flac (or wavpak) so i could go all flac (or wavpk) in reaper.
(i would be ecstatic if bb//rb went all flac as an option.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,480
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,480 |
As I remember it .. and I admit I'm getting old and have 'sometimers'
When RB imports a file, it is (under the hood) handled as WAV .. ie, it gets converted either during import or generation ..
so I suspect Flac would be much the same. When it gets saved as a SEQ file it is now raw WAV data, not WMA that needs to be converted again
/of course, everything I say may be wrong .. I can't know everything
*Edited to remove the things I may have been wrong about
Last edited by rharv; 12/17/22 02:21 AM.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,110
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,110 |
(or wavpak) Zoom++ 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,592
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,592 |
All//ANY SCEPTICS.
run this simple test..(as far as i know flac is truly lossless…see the xiph web site)
i just did this.
TEST.
..import a wav into reaper.
..render said wav to flac in reaps.
(or use another wav >>> flac convertor software if your v sceptical)
..after reaps render you can launch the flac to listen…do you hear a diff from wav ??
OR..
..now import the rendered flac back into a different trak in reaps.
so now we have two distinct traks in reaps…original imported wav and the just created flac trak.
BIG NOTICE >> note that reaps hasnt converted the flac file or added any new files if you look in the dir….cept for a waveform peaks file.
THUS i see no conversion process where the imported flac has been converted to wav for playback. (MCITY please confirm i'm not 'nuts' lol…, i see only the original wav and the rendered flac.)
..in reaps also you can play the original wav and the imported rendered flac….and compare the two traks in reaps.
ps the original wav was about 40 mb.
the flac was bout 20 mb.
a merry xmas to all.
om
ps MCITY. that looks mighty interesting thus i could export from bb and end up with the wav traks as flac or
wavpak ?
Last edited by justanoldmuso; 12/16/22 03:27 PM.
my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..) https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs(90 songs created useing bb/rb) (lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,110
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,110 |
...ps MCITY. that looks mighty interesting thus i could export from bb and end up with the wav traks as flac or
wavpak ?
Here's the size and quality:  And Biab using Flac & WavePack Zoom++ 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,630
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,630 |
Also, FWIW I don't think Flac is truly 'lossless' .. in other words if you decompress a Flac file there will be differences between it and the original. Easily proven empirically. I tested a number of compression formats and sample rates some years back, deciding which I'd use. With FLAC, I compressed WAV files to FLAC, then decompressed the FLAC to a WAV, then did a binary compare of the files. They were identical; not a single bit of error. I did that with a number of files and the outcomes were the same.
Jazz relative beginner, starting at a much older age than was helpful.
AVL:MXE Linux; Windows 11
BIAB2025 Audiophile, a bunch of other software.
Kawai MP6, Ui24R, Focusrite Saffire Pro40 and Scarletts
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,480
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,480 |
That's good to hear Gordon.
In my testing (much the same method) the file size actually varied when compressing/decompressing FLAC and comparing.
ie, they did not match after the process, whereas with Monkeys Audio they did.
This was quite a few years ago though.
Things change and I can accept that
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,630
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,630 |
Curious. There's always the question of whether it always works as it should and/or of whether the algorithm was implemented correctly in any particular context.
Jazz relative beginner, starting at a much older age than was helpful.
AVL:MXE Linux; Windows 11
BIAB2025 Audiophile, a bunch of other software.
Kawai MP6, Ui24R, Focusrite Saffire Pro40 and Scarletts
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!
Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!
We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.
Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!
Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.
If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!
Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!
We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
Happy New Year!
Thank you for being part of the Band-in-a-Box® community.
Wishing you and yours a very happy 2026—Happy New Year from all of us at PG Music!
Season's Greetings!
Wishing everyone a happy, healthy holiday season—thanks for being part of our community!
The office will be closed for Christmas Day, but we will be back on Boxing Day (Dec 26th) at 6:00am PST.
Team PG
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: The Newly Designed Piano Roll Window
In this video, we explore the updated Piano Roll, complete with a modernized look and exciting new features. You’ll see new filtering options that make it easy to focus on specific note groups, smoother and more intuitive note entry and editing, and enhanced options for zooming, looping, and more.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: AI Stems & Notes - split polyphonic audio into instruments and transcribe
This video demonstrates how to use the new AI-Notes feature together with the AI-Stems splitter, allowing you to select an audio file and have it separated into individual stems while transcribing each one to its own MIDI track. AI-Notes converts polyphonic audio—either full mixes or individual instruments—into MIDI that you can view in notation or play back instantly.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®
With your version 2026 for Windows Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- Android Band-in-a-Box® App (included)
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics85,815
Posts796,554
Members39,965
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean