Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#747568 01/03/23 12:48 AM
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,110
M
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
M
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,110
This is a reason why I keep posting info and ideas:

I open a VSTi like Superior Drummer 3, EZDrummer 3 and it all works so smoothly with real time signatures and real tempo maps.
Biab has the most vast incredible content BUT you need to be able to access it like the Toontracks VSTi's INSTANTLY.
So I keep posting regardless if there is interest or not, it may just go over the top of those reading the posts, it may annoy some that don't like change.
I liken it to one who travels back in time and tells those there of the future and they think he is crazy.
I won't be here forever so while I'm here I post the ideas and suggestions I see. Who knows maybe way down the track they might get used when things evolve a bit more and understanding grows.
I'm not here to run PG into the ground but try to lift it up where it needs to be, as professional as it's professional content.
I don't get anything out of it, I don't do it for "ME".

Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
EZy-To-Use-VSTi.png (304.66 KB, 268 downloads)
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 128
L
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
L
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 128
I agree. If I am on a forum posting negatively about something, it's done in the hope of change.

My problem with change is it's so rarely done for the better. If we all moan about the GUI in BIAB that'll probably be "addressed" with a fashionable flat, dark, colourless, borderless and very limited customisable interface with no separation between elements, as is the current trend. In my opinion there is nothing good about this.

The argument is about eyestrain but nobody accepts the fact it causes mental strain and drives you crazy trying to separate things visually. I guess it depends on your workflow, but for me, when I'm using software I am generally very busy - switching between screens, changing settings and values etc etc. The colourless lack of separation makes this a nightmare.

For me, the one thing that would make BIAB a thousand times better is not to bring it into the future but simply bring it into the early nineties would be good enough for me. New usable features? Yes maybe, but not at the cost of usability. BIAB is already very versatile but it's such a total mess that using it just brings you down and makes you want to give up.

Example, I spent all day yesterday trying to do a very basic task - it ended in me playing around, reverse engineering and experimenting all day just trying to make some sense of what is going on, in the hope that it will educate better for the next time I want to do something similar. The end result is if you finally figure it out, you'll have no chance of ever remembering it again. There is no logic, no common sense, no consistency.

The look of the GUI, in my opinion is OK, looks dated but it works. Customisable menu bars and keyboard shortcuts alone would improve things massively. But above all, I just want it to make sense. I want to be able to figure out the signal flow. I want all pop ups and options to be correlated. It's like everything they do is the complete opposite of the norm and you are just left guessing. Everything is just too random and inconsistent. The options that are obvious take way too many unnecessary clicks. Something that should be a simple click away is nested in submenus that you always have to look for, they're so buried that you can't just memorise things easily.

Pop ups that should stay open, close with each click. Just silly things like this and the list is huge.
Organisation. The styles, realtracks and drums - just another mess. The filter doesn't filter, it sorts things into just a different kind of mess. Ez drummer for example as you mentioned. Organised into styles, fills, grooves etc. Easy to find what you are looking for and choose what you want. This isn't modern, it's been the norm for 20+ years in just about every software I've ever know, seen or used. Just common sense.

For me - necessary changes to the GUI is nothing to do with the Graphic elements, just the user interface - it's in the name! Make the interface usable. If we all moan about it then the response will probably be the usual flat, colourless ... etc. with no improvement to usability.

I know this is like a huge rant, and of course, it is - but like you I do so in hope of change. If we stay quiet then things won't happen. BIAB is incredible and I use it almost daily. If there was any alternative then I would be gone, would have happened long ago. But there isn't so the more chance there is that they improve the workflow the more chance I'll stay loyal. We aren't that far away from being able to do a lot of this stuff with simplicity using DAWs and VSTs. My guess is within the next five years I won't be needing to use BIAB as often as I do because I'll just opt for the quicker, easier and more editable version of doing everything in the DAW. They currently still have the time and opportunity to stay ahead of the game but their time is running out.

Again, just to clarify, this isn't a rant for rant's sake - it's just a desperate call for change - put the features on hold, don't change the interface to borderless and just make things easy to figure out, with consistency.

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,694
C
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,694
<< "Example, I spent all day yesterday trying to do a very basic task - it ended in me playing around, reverse engineering and experimenting all day just trying to make some sense of what is going on, in the hope that it will educate better for the next time I want to do something similar. The end result is if you finally figure it out, you'll have no chance of ever remembering it again. There is no logic, no common sense, no consistency." >>

Could you share your example of the basic task that took "all day"?


BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 128
L
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
L
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 128
Originally Posted By: Charlie Fogle


Could you share your example of the basic task that took "all day"?


Yes and no. Now I've fixed it, the problems I had aren't so easy to remember and replicate, but I'll try to give the gist of things.

Simple task: Load a Hi-q patch on a utility track. In this instance it was Rock drum kit in sforzando. Create a beat in the piano roll (already a fiddly task) - decide I don't like the kit so changed it to playable realdrum "funklondon".

All good, happy with the sound. Close program, come back later, it's reverted to Rock kit. Weird, I'll change it again, maybe I didn't save? Nope, tried again - it won't save. Maybe this is normal behaviour for BIAB but it's certainly not "expected" behaviour from someone using software every day of their lives.

No problem, I'll see if I can figure out how to force the patch to save. Off to forum, quick look through the manual. No easy or obvious answer so I'm left experimenting and trying to figure things out.

Try again from the start. I'm now experimenting and testing in a temporary project. Create utility etc, select hi-q patch, choose funklondon ... up comes a pop up. "Aria session" or some such can't load, version is out of date.

Back to Google, back to the forum - what's Aria session loader? Turns out something to do with Plogue Art.

Me thinking "Surely it can't be out of date", I've only just updated to 2023, why would they show a playable realtrack that I can't use. Maybe I've done something wrong with the install? Back to the installer and reinstall BIAB update.

Nope, same problem. Sod it, I'll deal with that later and first see if I can find out how to make this patch stick.

More messing around, more experimenting, more forum searches. I end up in track settings (F7) trying to make some sense of how things work.

So far, all I can figure out is that only the first patch selected will get saved with the song. Now, this isn't actually true, it's just all I am able to determine at this point through experimentation, loading patches, saving, re-opening, etc.

At this point I'm clueless - it will let me load funklondon, let me play funklondon, it displays funklondon in the track mixer etc etc, it just won't save. Eventually I figure out that if it doesn't show in the top list of the track settings window then it won't save. Try the same in Cubase, load sforzando, choose instrument no problem, everything is saved as expected, nothing weird, all saves no problem.

In short, the only way to save a patch in BIAB is to load it from within BIAB itself. Completely unusual, not in the slightest expected behaviour and nothing to make this obvious.

All of these oddities wouldn't be so bad if we had some clue with what was going on and how BIAB does things. Nothing is intuitive. The little + sign in the track settings window in the midi patch section has little or nothing to do with midi patches as we'd normally expect so it takes a while to figure these things out. Nothing is consistent.

Ultimately, the session loader needed updating, it now works. No mention of this in the manual, very little on the forum and not updated with the program update.

It's just hard to get your head around things with such a convoluted piece of software where nothing works the same as pretty much all other software out there.

These kind of things happen often when I use BIAB. Maybe I just try to dig too deep into the details and understand how the thing works and what it's doing. After 25 odd years, I'm none the wiser.

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,538
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,538
I agree. I have been begging for real time signatures for a long time.

If you stay in the PGM world or you play your instrument/voice to PGM time signatures you are OK. BUT if you try to communicate outside of the PGM world you are DOA with anything other than 2/4, 3/4, or 4/4.

IMHO I think they are doing wonders with some very old coding however it is time for a complete rewrite.

YMMV


The fitness trainer asked me, "What kind of a squat are you accustomed to doing?" I said, "Diddly."


64 bit Win 11 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,550
C
Expert
Offline
Expert
C
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,550
I agree, EZ Drummer 3 provides a beautiful example of a very well thought and executed GUI, which not only does not hinder the user's workflow, but also enhances the user's creativity.

Despite having thousands of grooves in its database, it is always very easy to find exactly the groove you are looking for, thanks to the great categorization of the content, very powerful and well-defined filters, the ability to easily combine parts from different grooves, and, last but not least, thaks to game-changing features, such as Tap2find, or the new "Band mate", a feature that listens to the music and comes up with a beat.

Very good ideas that could also work really, really well in BIAB.


Last edited by Cerio; 01/03/23 01:13 PM.

Latest BIAB version, latest build.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,793
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,793
Originally Posted By: Lee N
I know this is like a huge rant, and of course, it is - but like you I do so in hope of change. If we stay quiet then things won't happen. BIAB is incredible and I use it almost daily. If there was any alternative then I would be gone, would have happened long ago. But there isn't so the more chance there is that they improve the workflow the more chance I'll stay loyal. We aren't that far away from being able to do a lot of this stuff with simplicity using DAWs and VSTs. My guess is within the next five years I won't be needing to use BIAB as often as I do because I'll just opt for the quicker, easier and more editable version of doing everything in the DAW. They currently still have the time and opportunity to stay ahead of the game but their time is running out.

I started with BIAB in 2012 and immediately recognized how behind the curve it was compared to other modern software. The changes since then have only been patchwork that in some ways make it even harder to use as new "features" (that sometimes are not finished) get bolted onto the program and in the way of workflow. I agree time is running out!

Originally Posted By: MarioD
IMHO I think they are doing wonders with some very old coding however it is time for a complete rewrite.

I agree 100%! It is amazing what I can get out of BIAB but it does need a complete rewrite. The two problems I see with that are 1) convincing PGM this is necessary and 2) I doubt they have a team that could do this.

Originally Posted By: Cerio
I agree, EZ Drummer 3 provides a beautiful example of a very well thought and executed GUI, which not only does not hinder the user's workflow, but also enhances the user's creativity.

Agreed! EZ Drummer 3 should be installed on every PGM programmer's computer and it should be studied as a great example of awesome software design!

I appreciate forum power-users who contribute their knowledge and share long-winded, convoluted work-arounds to the various warts we encounter with BIAB. I just wish they (and PGM) understood that these work-arounds should not be necessary in the first place! Using a piece of software in this manner sucks all of the fun and creativity out of the work.

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 128
L
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
L
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 128
Originally Posted By: JohnJohnJohn

I started with BIAB in 2012 and immediately recognized how behind the curve it was compared to other modern software. The changes since then have only been patchwork that in some ways make it even harder to use as new "features" (that sometimes are not finished) get bolted onto the program and in the way of workflow. I agree time is running out!



I don't remember when I got started with BIAB, probably late 90s, maybe early 2000s. It was clunky even back then, but was quite versatile. There was another one out at the time called Jammer - far far easier to use and intuitive but just didn't have quite the versatility of BIAB, so I went with BIAB.

I've no regrets, I still love the software but if I want to do anything more than type in some chords and load a style, then I just end up frustrated, nearly every time. Things I expect it to do or want it to do are so clumsy or hard to figure out that I usually give up in boredom or frustration of getting nowhere. Then one day you read in the forum about something and think "ah, brilliant, you can do that like this". It shouldn't be this difficult to figure things out.

I agree a complete software re-write would be the way to go but in the meantime there is so much that can be done, probably quite easily, just to tidy things up and make life easier.

As an analogy, IMO, if BIAB was a car, the handbrake would be on the passenger side, the accelerator on the left, brakes on the right, the headlights could be switched on by going outside and pressing each light three times, and each door would have its own separate key ... etc etc. Yes, we could argue that the car is still usable but we just couldn't be bothered going out in the dark or carrying passengers. As for changing the oil? We'd probably never figure out how!

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,118
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,118
Originally Posted By: JohnJohnJohn
..I appreciate forum power-users who contribute their knowledge and share long-winded, convoluted work-arounds to the various warts we encounter with BIAB. I just wish they (and PGM) understood that these work-arounds should not be necessary in the first place! ...
What makes you think that those experienced users here who do that are not working behind the scenes, as well as openly in the forums, to recommend changes to the program?


BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,377
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,377
Quote:
I appreciate forum power-users who contribute their knowledge and share long-winded, convoluted work-arounds to the various warts we encounter with BIAB. I just wish they (and PGM) understood that these work-arounds should not be necessary in the first place!

Believe me, we get frustrated too. And there is plenty of interaction with the developers, but improvements can only occur with their practical involvement and cooperation.


BIAB & RB2025 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,793
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,793
Originally Posted By: Matt Finley
Originally Posted By: JohnJohnJohn
..I appreciate forum power-users who contribute their knowledge and share long-winded, convoluted work-arounds to the various warts we encounter with BIAB. I just wish they (and PGM) understood that these work-arounds should not be necessary in the first place! ...
What makes you think that those experienced users here who do that are not working behind the scenes, as well as openly in the forums, to recommend changes to the program?

I am glad to hear experienced users are working on this. My frustration with this specific issue is when someone reports an obvious buggy weirdness or makes a reasonable wishlist request and someone responds as if it is not a problem at all if they will just learn the long-winded work-around they have created/discovered! And to be fair, I don't recall you ever doing that, Matt!

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,793
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,793
Originally Posted By: AudioTrack
Quote:
I appreciate forum power-users who contribute their knowledge and share long-winded, convoluted work-arounds to the various warts we encounter with BIAB. I just wish they (and PGM) understood that these work-arounds should not be necessary in the first place!

Believe me, we get frustrated too. And there is plenty of interaction with the developers, but improvements can only occur with their practical involvement and cooperation.

AudioTrack, your posts are always helpful! I was more referring to those who get defensive about perceived BIAB criticism.

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,377
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,377
Originally Posted By: JohnJohnJohn

AudioTrack, your posts are always helpful! I was more referring to those who get defensive about perceived BIAB criticism.

JJJ, All good. I follow exactly what you mean wink


BIAB & RB2025 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 6,745
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 6,745
+1

In my view, all what is said in posts above is perfectly summarized in a single sentence by Lee:

"They currently still have the time and opportunity to stay ahead of the
game but their time is running out."


It would be very sad if they don't take advantage of this "opportunity".

I believe, Ergonomics/workflow + consistency (both functions and visual) should be priority #1 for the BIAB(software*) at
this point in time. Functions are there, just make them usable and user friendly. And of course fix known problems ASAP.


*Excluding RT/RD/MIDI and other creative content, which is great.

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,538
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,538
Originally Posted By: Rustyspoon#
+1

In my view, all what is said in posts above is perfectly summarized in a single sentence by Lee:

"They currently still have the time and opportunity to stay ahead of the
game but their time is running out."


It would be very sad if they don't take advantage of this "opportunity".

I believe, Ergonomics/workflow + consistency (both functions and visual) should be priority #1 for the BIAB(software*) at
this point in time. Functions are there, just make them usable and user friendly. And of course fix known problems ASAP.


*Excluding RT/RD/MIDI and other creative content, which is great.


They are already way behind in the MIDI department. Companies like Toontrack have already passed them. Some of the MIDI piano, drums,etc loops are excellent. PGM is ahead in the RT and RD department because that is their main focus, and rightly so as it is their cash cow.


The fitness trainer asked me, "What kind of a squat are you accustomed to doing?" I said, "Diddly."


64 bit Win 11 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 6,745
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 6,745
Mario,
I believe PGM has enough of MIDI content, just most of it is not very usable because of workflow limitation.
Specifically, I am talking about individual instrument parts of huge library of PG MIDI styles. These are nearly impossible to extract into individual instrument tracks that can be mixed and matched like RT, RD and Super Midi tracks.

On top of that, many 3rd party MIDI pattern / loop libraries cost close to nothing. It's BIAB workflow that has issues/limitations with properly integrating those into composition.

In theory, you should simply be able to audition midi pattern or midi loop in a picker, place it on a track of your choice and it should follow tempo and chord changes without doing crazy acrobatics. If we are on the same page, it is a workflow item.

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,538
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,538
Misha,

Yes, I agree that the workflow is a major part of the problem, thus my "PGM is ahead in the RT and RD department" statement. That was part of what I was talking about.

However there are third party MIDI loops/tracks that are far superior to many of PGM MIDI tracks.

Some of PGM MIDI tracks are fantastic and I think your selecting individual MIDI tracks greatly enhance BiaB.


The fitness trainer asked me, "What kind of a squat are you accustomed to doing?" I said, "Diddly."


64 bit Win 11 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 462
S
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
S
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 462
Maybe it all will end up like a type Kodak Company situation. A market leading company and brand for decades where management failed to see or believe in the changes of the industry at that time even though a majority of the competition was.


BIAB 2025, Studio One 7 Pro, Song Master Pro, Win11 Home. i7-9700K CPU, 32GB, ESI MAYA44eX, Guitar Pro 8, Transcribe, (EZKeys2, EZD3, SD3, EZBass, EZMix3)
Amateur: fiddle, guitar, vocal, beginner on bass.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,118
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,118
A minor offshoot of this thread is about PG Music and MIDI. I just wanted to mention that I really enjoy the jazz piano MIDI Supertracks. I wish PG Music would release more of these. I know it didn't get widespread support when this was last discussed, but there are a few folks like Mario who use MIDI extensively and would really appreciate resuming making these.


BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,538
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,538
Originally Posted By: shlind
Maybe it all will end up like a type Kodak Company situation. A market leading company and brand for decades where management failed to see or believe in the changes of the industry at that time even though a majority of the competition was.


Yep. I know this quite well as I worked at Kodak research for 39 years. I went digital early on with a 2.1 MP camera. Most employees thought digital was just a phase. Well it has been a long phase hasn't it.


The fitness trainer asked me, "What kind of a squat are you accustomed to doing?" I said, "Diddly."


64 bit Win 11 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs Special Extended Until August 31st!

XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs Special Extended Until August 31st!

The XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs special offers are now available until August 31st at 11:59pm PDT!

Ready to take your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 experience to the next level? Now’s the perfect time! Expand your style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs—packed with a wide variety of genres to inspire your next musical creation.

What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?

XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-9 includes 900 styles!

Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). With over 3,500 styles (and 35 MIDI styles) included in Xtra Styles PAKs 1-20, the possibilities are endless!

Get the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Windows or for Mac.

Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.

Get Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 19 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Listen to demos and order now! For Windows or for Mac.

Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.

Don’t miss this chance to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box setup—at a great price!

Mac 2025 Special Upgrade Offers Extended Until August 15th!

It's not too late to upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® and save! We've extended our special until August 15, 2025!

We've added many major new features to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, including advanced AI tools like the amazing BB Stem Splitter and AI Lyrics Generator, as well as VST3 plugin support, and Equalize Temp. Plus, there’s a new one-stop MIDI Patches Picker with over 1,100 MIDI patches to choose from, all neatly categorized by GM numbers. The MultiPicker Library is enhanced with tabs for the SongPicker, MIDI Patch Picker, Chord Builder, AI Lyrics Generator, and Song Titles Browser, and the tabs are organized into logical groups. The Audiophile Edition is enhanced with FLAC files , which are 60% smaller than AIFF files while maintaining identical audio quality, and now ships on a fast 1TB SSD, and much more!

Check out all the new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® here:

Purchase your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac during our special to save up to 50% off your upgrade purchase and receive a FREE BONUS PAK of amazing new Add-ons. These include the 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK, Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana, Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes, MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano, Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7, Playable RealTracks Set 4, RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark, and more!

Upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and add 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and 20 RealStyles, FLAC Files for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks, Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster, MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster, Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8, and RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe.
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs!

New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2025!

We’ve expanded the Band-in-a-Box® RealTracks library with 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 449-467) across Jazz, Blues, Funk, World, Pop, Rock, Country, Americana, and Praise & Worship—featuring your most requested styles!

Jazz, Blues & World (Sets 449–455):
These RealTracks includes “Soul Jazz” with Neil Swainson (bass), Mike Clark (drums), Charles Treadway (organ), Miles Black (piano), and Brent Mason (guitar). Enjoy “Requested ’60s” jazz, classic acoustic blues with Colin Linden, and more of our popular 2-handed piano soloing. Plus, a RealTracks first—Tango with bandoneon, recorded in Argentina!

Rock & Pop (Sets 456–461):
This collection includes Disco, slap bass ‘70s/‘80s pop, modern and ‘80s metal with Andy Wood, and a unique “Songwriter Potpourri” featuring Chinese folk instruments, piano, banjo, and more. You’ll also find a muted electric guitar style (a RealTracks first!) and “Producer Layered Guitar” styles for slick "produced" sound.

Country, Americana & Praise (Sets 462–467):
We’ve added new RealTracks across bro country, Americana, praise & worship, vintage country, and songwriter piano. Highlights include Brent Mason (electric guitar), Eddie Bayers (drums), Doug Jernigan (pedal steel), John Jarvis (piano), Glen Duncan (banjo, mandolin & fiddle), Mike Harrison (electric bass) and more—offering everything from modern sounds to heartfelt Americana styles

Check out all the 202 New RealTracks (in sets 456-467)

And, if you are looking for more, the 2025 49-PAK (for $49) includes an additional 20 RealTracks with exciting new sounds and genre-spanning styles. Enjoy RealTracks firsts like Chinese instruments (guzheng & dizi), the bandoneon in an authentic Argentine tango trio, and the classic “tic-tac” baritone guitar for vintage country.

You’ll also get slick ’80s metal guitar from Andy Wood, modern metal with guitarist Nico Santora, bass player Nick Schendzielos, and drummer Aaron Stechauner, more praise & worship, indie-folk, modern/bro country with Brent Mason, and “Songwriter Americana” with Johnny Hiland.

Plus, enjoy user-requested styles like Soul Jazz RealDrums, fast Celtic Strathspey guitar, and Chill Hop piano & drums!

The 2025 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2025 49-PAK!

Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac!

With your version 2025 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Or upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!

These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!

This Free Bonus PAK includes:

  • The 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK: -For Pro customers, this includes 33 new RealTracks and 65+ new RealStyles. -For MegaPAK customers, this includes 29 new RealTracks and 45+ new RealStyles. -For UltraPAK customers, this includes 20 new RealStyles.
  • Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana
  • Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes
  • MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano
  • Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7
  • Playable RealTracks Set 4
  • RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark
  • SynthMaster Sounds and Styles (with audio demos)
  • 128 GM MIDI Patch Audio Demos.

Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:

  • 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyles,
  • FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
  • Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster,
  • Instrumental Studies Set 23: More '80s Hard Rock Soloing,
  • MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster
  • Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8
  • RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe

Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®!

New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Mac!

Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!

We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!

In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!

All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!

Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.

Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!

Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.

New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Mac!

We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!

We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!

If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!

Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!

Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.

Video: XPro Styles PAK 9 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!

XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.

New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Windows!

Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!

We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!

In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!

All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!

Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.

Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!

Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.

Forum Statistics
Forums58
Topics84,649
Posts782,374
Members39,714
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
Newest Members
DavidWah, nah, Silver180, GamophVex, Larry Mac
39,714 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 174
WaoBand 122
rsdean 119
Al-David 118
DC Ron 103
dcuny 89
Today's Birthdays
gfclef, Hans Hess, Henry Nurdin, Jerry Duguet
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5