I think that’s ok Gordon. The second link has Simon’s answer.
So is "intensity" the same thing as "group"?
I think not. Intensity of an individual style is compared to the intensity of the collective average of all styles (all three groups, as the term is used here).
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
that's actually a pretty cool and useful feature when browsing for suitable styles.
the "Group" column heading is quite misleading though. should perhaps be called "Intensity".
And I'm still not understanding the sort order of this column. Is it sorted just based on the intensity score, or genre/score? The latter would make more sense but I don't think this is the case. Will check when I am back at the PC.
I think the column sort order does an overall sort, but there are subtle nuances in the ordered items that don't always make immediate sense. I also presume that this is a deliberate part of the way the program sorting works in the way the presented items are ordered.
BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
the "Group" column heading is quite misleading though. should perhaps be called "Intensity".
Indeed, that Genre Intensity Score is the primary value being sorted on, 0 to 100, not Group (Pop/Jazz/Country) which is why the order looks off. Within a given number, the secondary sort order for grouping appears to be Jazz, Country, Pop.
They should rename the column and flip the terms so you have “75 Pop” etc.
Here is a somewhat more complete description of the feature.
Q. I'm sometimes looking for a style, but unsure if you've called it country, folk or something else, because those can be similar. Is there another way to find them?
A. We've introduced a new variable for this – called "Genre Score". That describes a style by a simple number from 1 to 100. This "genre score" works as follows: "quiet, classical, acoustic, jazz, folk" would have low genre scores (1 to 30) "loud, aggressive, heavy rock" have high genre scores (80-100), and light-medium pop would have mid-range genre scores. So, if you're looking for a quiet "living room" type style, use the StylePicker filter to only show styles with a genre score less than 40 – that might show jazz, classical, folk or other quiet-acoustic styles.
I can see the thinking, but still struggle with the execution.
Having just search for a 6/8 timed bossa/bolero style I see the following, which appears to me rather confused about genre or group. I imagine there's some history behind it.
I can't help thinking that 'intensity' should be separated from 'group' in the column, even if the genre is relevant to the decision on what is actually meant by intensity.
Jazz relative beginner, starting at a much older age than was helpful. AVL:MXE Linux; Windows 11 BIAB2026 Audiophile, a bunch of other software. Kawai MP6, Ui24R, Focusrite Saffire Pro40 and Scarletts .
Ideally we could decide what column to sort on, then within that sorted order, sort on another column, then within that, sort on a third etc. Intensity would not need to be accompanied by any Group info; it could just be a number. In this way I could rank only the styles I want to choose from by intensity. I’m also assuming ‘intensity’ could be defined then determined objectively.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
I won’t be quoting it, but I’ve been chatting with ChatSonic, and it has ideas about this similar to those of ChatGPT. Both AIs, I assume, encountered an earlier incarnation of this “genre score” / “intensity score” while training on an old release note or something, where it is indeed some kind of index of genre influence as opposed to simple musical intensity.
Which still doesn’t explain where the idea of a “group” — not the same as “genre” — comes in, and why it’s glued to these scores in this way and sitting up there in the heading. Was “intensity” at one point supposed to be an index of influence of one of the “big three” supercategories, Jazz, Pop, and Country?
Perhaps there is a menu hack that will rename the column “intensity” and simply delete everything but the number in those scores.
My guess is that Group concept arose from the early BIAB days of providing extra paks in those three overarching categories.
I guess before the mysterious genre/intensity score was invented, the “group” column simply grouped styles into those three buckets, back in the day when it made more sense to do this, when they weren’t so many.
How someone got the idea to hijack that column the way it’s been hijacked is an interesting question in technical anthropology.
indeed, i quickly discovered this was not working as one might expect. for example, primary sort on Genre, and then secondary sort on Set within each genre.
Originally Posted By: Matt Finley
Ideally we could decide what column to sort on, then within that sorted order, sort on another column, then within that, sort on a third etc. Intensity would not need to be accompanied by any Group info; it could just be a number. In this way I could rank only the styles I want to choose from by intensity. I’m also assuming ‘intensity’ could be defined then determined objectively.
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you over the phone. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday, and 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST Saturday. We are closed Sunday. You can also send us your questions via email.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you on our Live Chat or by email. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday; 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST (GMT -8) Saturday; Closed Sunday.
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean