If you were charged by Peter Gannon to come up with a one year, five year or ten year plan for PG Music to follow what would it be?

User Musocity +++ mentioned +++
Quote:
Why can't this all be done in the DAW with the BBPlugin ? that should be the aim of PG.
his belief PG Music should be concentrating on the Band-in-a-Box (BiaB) plugin to support working in a DAW.

User MusicVillian states his belief +++ HERE +++ that
Quote:
The longer you stay in Band-in-a-Box the more you can utilize it's resources. The instant you render and create a scalar track to move out of Band-in-a-Box you lose ALL the unique resources the program offers. If you want to change anything you can always go back but that's starting over and losing all your preceding work.


There is no right or wrong and both workflows can be accommodated at the present time but what about PG Music's plan for the future? Where should PG Music spend it's development resources?

Jim Fogle - 2025 BiaB (Build 1128) RB (Build 5) - Ultra+ PAK
DAWs: Cakewalk Sonar - Standalone: Zoom MRS-8
Laptop: i3 Win 10, 8GB ram 500GB HDD
Desktop: i7 Win 11, 12GB ram 256GB SSD, 4 TB HDD
Music at: https://fogle622.wix.com/fogle622-audio-home