If I could do the below in Reaper on Mac and Win would PG still need to make RealBand for Mac ?
Everything RealBand generates is from calling bbw2 (Band In A Box) in the background that generates to wav in RealBand's temp folder.
Sure you could spend a lot of time making RealBand work like Reaper and a Mac version as well but what's practical ?

The most wonderful thing BiaB does is generate up a txt file with all the sections of source RT files it's pieced together, I really don't need anything else from Biab but that. I would still buy Biab for the content alone not for 49 new things. I have way more control in Reaper than Biab. Why is PG not letting Reaper users do this right now ? would it make things too easy for them ? Reaper implemented wma play direct for this very reason. It's a simple thing to giver users, is not as hard as implementing wma in Reaper.

I could go and make a VST that will just use the content PG has but instantly generate up the sections in the DAW of choice and play direct from the source file sections. I've shown it working with Sforzando but why do I have to do it and not PG ?
BB-Track-Data-To-SFZ-4-Tracks.mp4
Mixcraft-WMA.mp4
Studio-One-WMA.mp4
they are just playing the txt files that play the files sections direct from the RT/RD folder.
I could do it, other companies could do it, XLN Audio where advertising for C++ programmers and product designers for new ideas. I would much rather see PG get their finger out and do it not tomorrow, not the next day but now.

This is opening the txt files in Reaper but it will be instant if PG give the track data file in C:bb\Data\BBoutput.txt as at the moment it needs to go into BB menus and run functions and wait for txt file to read:
Zoom++