Proposition is to use stems of existing MIDI styles as tracks. Existing method is working, but workflow is simply absurd.
I propose a non-modal module (meaning you can do other things in arrangement similar to new Partial Regen) In that module you will have curated list of MIDI stems derived from PG midi styles and others*, that you can audition in the context of existing arrangement (chord sheet), using selectable internal synth, which could use PG branded HQ sounds or directly through Default or selected plugin on a particular track. Placing desired stem to any empty track. Since it could be non modal, you can continue audition other stems and placing them on other tracks, without closing out of that module.
A good start would be pianos and other keys as they can be easily re-voiced to many other instruments. Later list of these stems could be expanded to other instruments found in MIDI styles.
A user should be able to save pulled stem as a User track (not rendered audio!) to be used with any other composition.
It seems at one point PG team started tackling the idea, coming up with "Presets" in Custom Midi dialog, but that is still very raw, with those abra cadabra names and string search madness, no preview and other unintuitive workflow issues.
The existing PG MIDI content is huge (I am not talking about Super Midi). So what I am proposing is not something from science fiction. The idea is to be able to use existing content with ease. As of now, it feels that MIDI content is simply lost for most people.
Here is a video demoing existing workflow for using / extracting stems. Sorry a bit raw, I am not a content maker
Not just metadata but MIDI files, audio waveforms and image thumbnails can be displayed with zooming. One-click playback of MIDI and audio files. Drag any MIDI tracks directly to your DAW.
Musocity... looks nice. Ideas, sure. I would rather see condensed simpler filtered picker similar to ones found in Halion, Synthmaster and many others.
#1 Task: The work must be done to sift through the jungle of PGmusic MIDI styles to find better stems. A good start, in my opinion would be extract 300-400 usable piano and related stems from styles, rename, index them etc. The good news, this doesn't require much knowledge in programming, just a pair of good ears, so even a PGmusic intern can do this kind of work.
My main issue is this. Most of us own the content, it is there! But almost no one uses it, simply because the workflow is absolutely awkward.
If I take bb\Data\CustomMIDIPResets.txt and add the rest of the instruments from all the other midi .STY to it then make it into a proper csv that can be sorted in the floating picker/browser. It would preview the the midi by using it's patch with the default synth and playing back the midi contained in the .STY as a 4 Bar Preview. So if it's what you want it would then generate up that instrument in the chosen track.
The first instrument in the CustomMIDIPResets.txt is
Synth, Alternative Rock A-B Ev 170 Any$altrock1$strings$103
Memo: Alternative rock even 8ths feel. 5 instruments: acoustic guitar, bass, drums & high synth at A. Add distorted electric guitar at B. T=150-190 -Examples: How You Remind Me, Semicharmed Life, Genre "Intensity" Score=70/100 ALTROCK1.STY. Alternative Rock 1 Style All MIDI. Quintet. Tempo=170 (150-190) Instruments: M-Finger Electric Bass, M-Distorted Rock Guit, M-Acoustic Guitar, M-Echo Sweep M9 Room Drum Kit M34: Finger Electric Bass M31: Distorted Rock Guitar M26: Acoustic Guitar M103: Echo Sweep
I'm thinking it would be easier to batch extract the instruments from the midi STY to the CustomMIDIPResets.txt but maybe these have been manually named ? You wouldn't want to go through them all manually.
Trombone, Simple Root Ev 100 Any$Brass_44$guitar$58
Memo: This Style will emulate a brass quintet playing in 4/4 time. T=50-200 -Examples: Fanfares, Rule Britannia,, Genre "Intensity" Score=10/100 BRASS_44.STY. Simple Brass Quintet 4/4 Style All MIDI. Duo. Tempo=120 (60-180) Instruments: M-Trumpet, M-Trombone M57: Trumpet M58: Trombone
There are tools that preview instruments in Yamaha prs sty styles, I can't remember if JJazzLab will do that and import the separate tracks from different styles.
I just had a look a the keyboard styles in JJazzLab and it's much the same, it has the style name and basic instrument names, they don't use 8 character names anymore for the keyboard styles. Modern Pop Ballad.T173.prs Mod Orch Ballad.T173.STY Big Band Shuffle.T157.STY
After going all through this how it works now with the Custom Midi Dialog, it just needs all to be in one floating picker that you browse the styles and each style will display the contained tracks that you can select and preview without going in and out of jail dialogs, if it's what you like it will generate that instrument into the chosen track and allow you to choose another track and another style instrument without going in/out of jails. A floating compact trimmed down version of the current style picker that just shows midi styles.
Musocity, your last paragraph is a rephrasing of what I requested. The mock drawing I included is a drawing of a picker. A "floating" module/ picker. I was too lazy to fill it with example content.
The extraction of midi stems in bulk, that part In will leave to PGmusic. Maybe they already have them separated. The work is to curate the list. There are many junky styles, with just simple chord slaps. But there are others which are great. I would prefer a much smaller list of stems that are good-great, rather than thousands of things that you will need a showel to go through.
My question is, when select a yellow MIDI for a track, what is the difference between "Select MIDI Instrument (Patch)" and "Select Custom MIDI for this track"?
They both seem to do the same thing: Assign a yellow MIDI to your track.
Another question is: If you don't like part of the yellow MIDI, can you do a partial regen?
Unfortunately, Alt+F8 and MultiRiff features only work on green RealTracks, not yellow MIDI tracks.
A Canadian music producer, singer songwriter, composer, and professional guitarist.
Musicvanillin, I cheer your strive to learn, however your post belongs in a non-wish section since it is unrelated to the wish. You will most likely get your answers in the Windows section of the forum. Kindly, try to keep focused discussion topics within that subject. Thank you.
I can copy and paste my questions to the Windows forum, but the two questions I asked are based on after watching the YouTube video you shared in this thread.
I don't think many people in the Windows forum have watched your video.
Could you at least share some thoughts on my questions? If you don't want post it here, you can private message me.
I want to know why in the video, you choose "Select Custom MIDI Style", not "Select MIDI Patch". Any benefits?
A Canadian music producer, singer songwriter, composer, and professional guitarist.
"Select patch" as name implies selecting a patch-SOUND. As I understand that is for selecting GM based sounds when you already have things happening in Piano roll.
Custom Midi- selects (pulls) a MIDI segment/performance stem from PG MIDI style catalog.
I have watched 3 of your videos in the past, one for Alt+F8 non modal, one for exporting MIDI from BiaB, one for this custom select MIDI suggestion. Very informative and demonstrative videos. Short but helpful!
I hope PG Music could consider hiring you to make more short tips & tricks videos like this in the future.
It would be beneficial to everyone in the forum.
A Canadian music producer, singer songwriter, composer, and professional guitarist.
"I hope PG Music could consider hiring you to make more short tips & tricks videos like this in the future." Ha ha. that's funny. I do agree that indexed video manual should be in place. At least to cover basics.
But boys, c'mon. So far it is this and that... Do you see the what I am talking about? PG MIDI content is Ali Baba's cave. We have it - We need to be able to use it. I don't believe my request is a rocket science. Do you see the potential?
> A good start, in my opinion would be extract 300-400 usable piano and related stems from styles, rename, index them etc.
The custom MIDI feature uses any track from another style. For example, if might use the Freddie guitar comping track from a a jazfred.sty. That midi track plays actual guitar voicings, and they change in the style of the famous 4-in-the-bar comping style used by big band guitarists.
To use, it you need to choose jazfred.sty, and select the guitar track.
You have requested “extracting stems from styles”. There isn’t a single MIDI loop that would represent the guitar track generated by Freddie.sty. The patterns aren’t just mapped to chord tones - there are methods that play differently over different chords, different parts of the form etc.
If you extracted a few bars and just did a mapping to chord tones, it wouldn’t sound like the guitar part in the Freddie style, and wouldn’t even be playing real guitar voicings. It would sound robotic and have lost its musicality. ‘Would you want us to replace a MIDI supertrack with a single MIDI loop that you could map to chord tones? That would also sound bad. And nothing as good as the actual midi supertrack. And the same reasoning applies to the midi tracks from midi styles.
Likely what is needed is the existing method (custom midi tracks) to be enhanced with better auditioning to choose what track/style you want. And maybe a way to generate part of a track as a one time action.
I could be wrong I will see what Rusty says but I think he wants the whole style track (stem) but an easier way to preview and choose them. I originally thought he was talking about creating midi sections like EZKeys to drag in.
OK. This thread was supposed to be a fun read of Misha saying "Open Sesame" to the MIDI treasures hidden in BiaB. But now it's getting a bit technical here.
Can someone please help me understand what Peter Gannon was saying in his last post? There's some quite juicy stuff going on there I'm still trying to grasp.
Quote:
There isn’t a single MIDI loop that would represent the guitar track generated by Freddie.sty. The patterns aren’t just mapped to chord tones - there are methods that play differently over different chords, different parts of the form etc.
In BiaB, there are two methods of inserting yellow MIDI to a track. One way is to insert MIDI super track, then in the dialog box select a yellow MIDI, not a blue MIDI. The other way is the method of discussed in this thread, select custom MIDI style, then select a stem from that style.
So, did Peter mean, each method mentioned above is accessing to different yellow MIDI database? For yellow MIDI, BiaB has two different database collections?
Did Peter also mean, some yellow MIDI doesn't change based on chords?
Quote:
And maybe a way to generate part of a track as a one time action.
Did Peter mean, currently in BiaB, you can not partial regen a yellow/blue MIDI track?
If you like the MIDI track but want to regen only a few bars and keep the rest, you can't do that?
A Canadian music producer, singer songwriter, composer, and professional guitarist.
MusicVillain... I am not asking for workarounds. I am sorry, I believe you are missing the whole point of proposal.
Have ever tried arrangers or backing modules and assembled your custom styles? You have a pool of loops/stems and are able to audition just those separated parts out of the style they initially belonged to and re-assemble your own style. The pool of separated from styles instrumental lines, that is what the request is for.
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you over the phone. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday, and 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST Saturday. We are closed Sunday. You can also send us your questions via email.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you on our Live Chat or by email. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday; 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST (GMT -8) Saturday; Closed Sunday.
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean