Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
User Showcase
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,656
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,656
Third song in a week. Argh. Sorry - "inspiration" seems to have struck a number of times, with me, this week - and I'm curious to hear what you genuinely think of this one, so ... thank you so much for listening, for any feedback, and especially for your patience with me.

When One Loves A Rose

EDIT: following your truly kind advice, I have remixed the song. Is this better? Feedback welcome - thank you!


When One Loves A Rose (Take 2)

SECOND EDIT: David Cuny very kindly re-mixed this for me, with Synthetizer V's Eleanor Forte and Kevin voices. I put this link in a separate post ... maybe I should have put this here, in the first place. Sorry. Anyway, for convenience, here it now is ... thank you, David!

When One Loves A Rose (mix by David Cuny)

THIRD EDIT: I dared to mess around with David's mix, a little, tonight ... I made a couple of changes, mainly in volume contrast. I hope you like this, and, hopefully, that David won't mind me tinkering a little more with his mix? See what you think? smile Thanks smile


When One Loves A Rose (4th and final remix?)


P.S. I made a video for it, too - today, 29 May 2023 smile Hope you enjoy.





THE LYRICS:

(DUET)

And that's how it goes
In this world of woes,
When one softly knows
That one loves a rose.

***

(MALE VOICE)

For he doesn't understand
Just how much she loves him,
And he doesn't understand
Just how bad she wants him,

And he doesn't understand
Why she's been so harsh to him,
So he walks away, once more
From his loved one's open door ...

By the fountain where they met
He is there on odd days,
Mondays, Wednesdays and the Fridays,
That is where he will stay,

And on Sundays, he goes home,
And he lets his eyes pour
Tears, awaiting the return
Of a flame that's no more.

***

(DUET)

And that's how it goes
In this world of woes,
When one softly knows
That one loves a rose.

***

(FEMALE VOICE)

For she doesn't understand
Just how much he loves her,
And she doesn't understand
Just how bad he wants her,

And she doesn't understand
Why he's been so harsh to her,
So she walks away, once more
From her loved one's open door ...

By the fountain where they met
She is there on even days,
Tuesdays, Thursdays and the Saturdays,
That is where she will stay,

And on Sundays, she goes home,
And she lets her eyes pour
Tears, awaiting the return
Of a flame that's no more.

***

(DUET)

And that's how it goes
In this world of woes,
When one softly knows
That one loves a rose.


THE SOLOISTS:

Lucy and Jay (from Emvoice)

THE BAND:

****** Song Summary *************
Title: When One Loves A Rose - 23 May 2023
File:When One Loves A Rose - 23 May 2023.SGU
Key=C , Tempo 60, Length (m:s)=3:16
No intro. 45 bar chorus, from bar 1 to bar 45. Repeat x1 chorus
No Melody
No Soloist track.
Song is saved with Volume, Pan, Reverb, Chorus, Bank0,
Style is _LILIES.STY (Lilies Nylon New Age Pop Ballad)

RealTracks in style: 2702:Bass, Synth, CloudRapSub Ev16 075
RealTracks in style: 1543:Synth Pad, PopBelieve Ev16 065
RealTracks in style: 3910:Guitar, Nylon, Fingerpicking SongwriterSlow16DADGAD Ev16 060
RealTracks in style: 1840:Synth Pad, PopModernGrooveMellow Ev16 075
RealTracks in style: 2704:Synth, Rhythm CloudRapLowOrgan Ev16 075
RealDrums in style:Cajon and Chillout Loop [Multi]

*******************

Mixed in Mixcraft Pro Studio 9

Last edited by musician17; 05/28/23 09:55 PM.
User Showcase
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 13,010
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 13,010
James,

A pleasant song.
Backing track is nice.
Cool to see you trying out the synth voices.
Jay sounds pretty good. Lucy sounded like a computer.
When they sing together, it sounds more like some "modern" effect on a single voice than two voice doing a duet...

Looking forward to where you go with this...

fj

User Showcase
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 8,708
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 8,708
Hi James ...

I've downloaded the free version of Synthesizer V, but haven't figured out much yet. You have a good foundation to work from. Floyd pretty much summed up the vocal qualities of the voices. Good first effort with the synth voices. Keep at it, and I'm sure your skills with it will improve with each attempt. Kudos for putting it "out there" for the feedback. Hang in there with it and show it who's boss!

Alan


BIAB 2024 Ultra Plus-all StylePaks*Win11*32GB DDR5*Rhyzen 9745x*AT 2035 Mic*Peavey Nashville 112 Amp*Ibanez ART120* Acoustic/Electric/Washburn D200S Acoustic*Stromberg Monterey Jazz Guitar

Loops: https://aldavidmusic.wixsite.com/bestmusicloops

User Showcase
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 25,001
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 25,001
James, I also agree with Floyd's vocal comments.

But this is a really good start.
Super groove.
Nice mic.

I'm sure you will get much better with those synth vocals as you gain experience.


Life is short so make sure you spend as much time as possible on the Internet arguing with strangers.

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
User Showcase
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,326
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,326
My genuine thoughts? wink

Musically, the song is pretty good. There are some notes that much too short. Robots can sing the notes, but they don't sound like what a human sound sing.

The vocals? When the voices sing together, it's bad.

The synthesis sounds like 1990s formant synthesis. Jay, the male voice, isn't "real", but it's pleasant to listen to. Not at all convincing, but it gets the idea of the song across without drawing too much attention to itself.

On the other hand, Lucy, the female voice, sounds like Jay pitched up an octave with some formants shifted. It's doesn't sound even remotely human, it's distracting to listen to, and worse, it's hard to make out what's being said.

It's not any fault on your part. I just listened to demos that Emvoice posted of their singers, and although you can hear the character of the person behind them, the vocoder that Emvoice is using simply isn't capable of rendering the female voice realistically.


-- David Cuny

My virtual singer development blog
Vocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?

BiaB 2025 | Windows 11 | Reaper | Way too many VSTis.
User Showcase
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,656
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,656
Thanks, everyone smile Yes, David Cuny, I asked for genuine thoughts, and I'm glad I got them wink Just a couple of things I'd like to add, if that's ok:

1) I didn't "treat" the voices with any post-production effect at all, in an attempt to make them sound more "human", perhaps. I just put them to work "as they came", out of the box. That's my mistake. That female voice, as you say, needs humanizing, lol. I will see what I can do - though, knowing nothing about post-production, I am mostly "doing it by ear". I will try, though smile

2) Thank you for giving me honest opinions on the technical aspects of things. My knowledge of those things is zero. I just write songs, that's all ... how they are performed, I often leave that "up to the performer", as it were. HOWEVER: I have indeed noticed that, if I do learn about how things can be worked on, from a post-production standpoint, they can truly improve the end result of the recording, so that it sounds less like an amateurish, perhaps, "demo" - and more towards the professional end of things. Again, I'm only a songwriter, that's all - but your advice has been invaluable in making my little demos more palatable to the human ear smile - so you all have my most grateful thanks, for this!!! smile

and finally, a question:

3) Where would you think I can get some better-sounding vocaloids? I've got absolutely no money to spend on something like this, right now, but - if that changes in the near future, why not? I only bought Emvoice, last December, because they were on sale - and I thought that two English-singing vocaloid voices is better than nothing at all. So yes, just out of curiosity, if possible: what would you recommend instead? smile

THANK YOU!!!!!!! Without your advice, coupled with PG Music's miraculous Band-in-a-Box software, none of this would be real.

P.S.

4) Thank you also for the kind musical thoughts, on this. As I wrote, above: since I like to focus a lot on the songwriting side of things, these thoughts of yours really do help in making me a better songwriter smile Please, please, keep them coming!!! smile

and

5) thanks for your incredible patience in putting up with me and my songs smile

User Showcase
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,326
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,326
Originally Posted By: musician17
That female voice, as you say, needs humanizing, lol. I will see what I can do - though, knowing nothing about post-production, I am mostly "doing it by ear". I will try, though

This isn't something that can be fixed in post production. No matter how much EQ or reverb you might apply to the vocal, it's still going to sound robotic.

If the vocal were sung at a lower pitch, it wouldn't be as bad, but it would still be very robotic. Emvoice simply can't do realistic vocals. They sound like they're coming through a vocoder because... well, they are using a vocoder. It's just not one capable of creating realistic female vocals, and the higher the vocals go in pitch, the less good they sound.

Originally Posted By: musician17
3) Where would you think I can get some better-sounding vocaloids? I've got absolutely no money to spend on something like this, right now, but - if that changes in the near future, why not? I only bought Emvoice, last December, because they were on sale - and I thought that two English-singing vocaloid voices is better than nothing at all. So yes, just out of curiosity, if possible: what would you recommend instead?

At the risk of breaking the "no advertising other products" rule, the best synthetic singing software on the market is SynthesizerV by Dreamtonics. That's obviously subject to change as time goes on.

Since money is an issue, I'd suggest using the free Basic editor and the lite version of Eleanor Forte and Solaria (scroll down the page to find it). These free voices have restrictions and are for non-commercial use only, but should be fine for your purposes of making demos. There are currently no Lite male English voices, but you can use the Gender option on a female voice to morph it to a male voice.

The Lite voices aren't going to fool anyone into thinking they're listening to a real human, but they'll still be far better than Lucy.


-- David Cuny

My virtual singer development blog
Vocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?

BiaB 2025 | Windows 11 | Reaper | Way too many VSTis.
User Showcase
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,656
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,656
Thank you so much, David!!! Will check these voices, and the editor, now. What an amazing forum this is, where people so kindly help one another in their common quest to create better music. Thanks everyone, again!!! smile

User Showcase
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,656
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,656
Just remixed it all. See what you think? Thanks!!! (link at the top of the page - Take 2 version).

User Showcase
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,326
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,326
Hi, James.

The vocals at the very beginning now sound even more synthetic and harder to recognize as vocals.

I've got mixed feelings about the reverb - in some cases, it makes the consonants harder to hear.

On the other hand, there are places where the /s/ is more clear than where it was before.


-- David Cuny

My virtual singer development blog
Vocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?

BiaB 2025 | Windows 11 | Reaper | Way too many VSTis.
User Showcase
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,656
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,656
Fair enough smile

For the record, I kind of WANT those beginning vocals to be more synthetic. They represent Destiny ("that's how it goes", etc.) versus the (doomed) Love Story that the solo voices sing about - and which I'd therefore prefer to be more "human" in timbre. That said, that beginning must not be SO synthetic that the words cannot be understood ... argh smile Back to the drawing board? smile

Thanks, David!!!

User Showcase
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,530
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,530
Sounds cool James!

Sounds like everyone is getting in on the synth voice act now.

smile

Hmmmmmmmmm.......

I have to say...well, I think I am the biggest fan of the real James to tell you the truth.

User Showcase
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,656
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,656
Haha, thanks David Snyder ... but, seriously, could you ever (even as such a big fan of mine wink ) hear me hit any sort of a high note? I still struggle singing in my one-octave register, lol ... whereas you can now hit high Bs, as I've heard from your superb, latest song ... but THANK YOU for the kind words! I promise: wherever possible, I shall use my own voice to sing/speak/whatever, when recording smile Thanks again smile

User Showcase
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 7,314
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 7,314
Def. too many clustered notes in the melody and that reinforces the synthetics.
Larger intervals do the same.It's a great start though and a good song to start with.
Consider working the voices to match your own range or mine - within an octave and with smaller intervals.
GREAT potential sir.


Cheers
rayc
"What's so funny about peace, love & understanding?" - N.Lowe
User Showcase
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 5,189
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 5,189
3rd ONE!! Sheesh, I must've missed some-- gotta check. Had good excuse though because I have a lot of your music playing in the background here. Inspirational.

I listened to this one without reading first. I actually thought that was you singing. I sounds a bit like you, but the range is way over the top. It's really cool that you're exploring the synth voices, and there a some good advice in that regard on this forum. I agree that Lucy sounded rather computerized, but Jay sounded like you, so that's good. I still like your speaking vocals, but this is an interesting diversion and I hope to hear more as you develop it.

This is a good song. It's till in my ears when it's over, so I know it's good. Well done, James. And now I have some catching up to do.


Enjoy whatever happens!
marty

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@babumusic51
SoundCloud: https://soundcloud.com/marty-straub
Band in a Box, Reaper, Cakewalk, Ozone 12, EZDrummer
User Showcase
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 11,000
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 11,000
Cool tune and ditto on the Synth V recommendation. The whole secret, if there is a secret, is to take your time and work on the details. Which is pretty much like everything else you want to do and do well.


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
User Showcase
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,656
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,656
Ray: David Cuny's remix, I believe, addresses some of the range and note congestions concerns ... thanks for pointing them out, Ray! Glad you liked the song!

Marty: Haha - no worries about catching up smile Glad you liked the song. I have work to do, with the synths, myself - but David Cuny has done a superb re-mix For me smile Thanks!!!

Guitarhacker: Yep. Detail. Spot on. I entirely overlooked the need for post-production work, the first time around. Anyhow, David Cuny's saved me, this time, with his new mix, but yes ... next time, I mustn't be "napping on the job", haha. Thanks!!!

User Showcase
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,656
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,656
David Cuny: ever so sorry. I decided to fiddle a little with your mix - I hope you won't mind? smile See what you think? smile THANKS smile

User Showcase
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,656
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 2,656
Also added a YouTube video, now ... argh ... smile Thanks for any views/listens and further comments smile


User Showcase
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,326
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,326
Hi, James.

It's your song to do with what you want. smile

It was a fun project. I haven't really done anything so "musical theatre" before, and I think the result makes it easier for people to hear what the song could be.

For vocals, obviously real vocals are going to be far beyond what synthetic vocals can give. But I suspect that even the female vocals using the free version of SynthV will give a better presentation that Emvoice will. There are currently no free English male voices for SynthV, but there apparently will be a "lite" version of "Asterian" voice in the near future.

As for the mix... every mix has specific goals. For mine, I wanted to create a sense of movement while still keeping the original instrumentation. That mostly involved using gain faders and some low-level edits on the drums.

The rest of it - the balance between the instruments, how much and what sort of effects to use - is subjective. You've heard my suggestions. On another day, I might make different choices.

Thanks for letting me work on this!


-- David Cuny

My virtual singer development blog
Vocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?

BiaB 2025 | Windows 11 | Reaper | Way too many VSTis.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Peter Gannon Talks Band-in-a-Box with zplane

zplane recently interviewed Peter Gannon, the founder and creator of Band-in-a-Box, about the software's early days, what sets it apart from AI, how zplane's audio algorithms are used in Band-in-a-Box, and more!

Special thanks to the team at zplane for their continued support.

Check out the full interview here: https://products.zplane.de/blog/peter-gannon-interview-pg-music

Last Chance! The Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® Special Ends Today (May 31, 2026) at 11:59pm PDT!

Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PDT today!

We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!

Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.

Another exciting new addition is the amazing new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. View the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to transcribe an entire track or transcribe specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®.

There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, and much more!

Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Mac® to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!

Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.

If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Special Offers Extended Until May 31st!

Good news- we've extended our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® special offers until May 31, 2026!

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 is packed with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can transcribe an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, and much more!

There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®.

When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PDT on May 31st, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.

Check out the Band-in-a-Box® for Mac packages page to find the best package for you.

Holiday Weekend Hours

It's Victoria Day Long Weekend in Canada. Our Customer Service hours are:

Saturday, May 16: Closed
Sunday, May 17: Closed
Monday, May 18: 8:00am - 4:00pm

Regular hours
resume Tuesday, May 19th!

Today's the Last Day of the Band-in-a-Box 2026® for Mac Special!

Order before 11:59pm PDT today (May 15, 2026) to save up to 50% off your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® upgrade and receive a FREE Bonus PAK loaded with great new Add-ons to use with this new version!

Don't wait - order today!

Check out all the new features in the redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac - Special Offers End at 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th, 2026!

Order before 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th and SAVE up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® version 2026 for Mac Upgrade packages... and that's not all! With your version 2026 for Mac purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks... that's 222 NEW RealTracks available with version Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac!

Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® today for as little as $49! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all available purchase options.

Learn more about the Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK here.

If you have any questions about which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We're here to help!

202 New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2026!

With Band-in-a-Box® 2026, we've released 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 468-488) in a variety of genres—featuring your most requested styles!

Jazz, Funk & World (Sets 468-475):
Our new jazz, funk & blues RealTracks include a groovin’ collection of RealTracks and RealDrums! These include more requested “soul jazz” RealTracks featuring artists Neil Swainson (bass), Charles Treadway (organ), Brent Mason (guitar), and Wes Little (drums). There are new “smooth jazz” styles (4), which include a RealTracks first: muted trumpet, as well as slick new smooth jazz brushes options for drums. Blues lovers will be thrilled—there are more “classic acoustic blues” styles, including guitar (5), bass (4), and drums (10) with blues master Colin Linden, featuring understated and tasty background acoustic soloing, plus brushes drums and acoustic bass. There are also new electric blues RealTracks, including electric blues with PG favorite Johnny Hiland (3) and soulful electric slide guitar from Colin Linden (4). If you love funk & gospel, there are great new options this year, including gospel organ (3) from Charles Treadway, as well as new funk, tango, and rock ’n’ roll drums (3) and bass (1). And for big, bold arrangements, we have uptempo soul horns (4) featuring a three-part hip horn section with options for a full mix or stems of each individual horn — plus an accompanying rhythm section (4) of drums, bass, guitar, and electric piano!

Rock & Pop (Sets 476–482):
Our new rock & pop RealTracks bring a powerful mix of requested favorites, fresh genres, and modern chart-inspired styles! We have more of our popular “Producer Layered Acoustic Guitars (15)” featuring Band-in-a-Box favorite Brent Mason. We’ve continued our much-requested disco styles (10), and added new Celtic guitar (5) with a more basic, accessible approach than our previous Drop-D or DADGAD offerings. There are also highly requested yacht rock styles (17), inspired by the smooth, polished soft-rock sound of the late ’70s and early ’80s — laid-back grooves, silky electric pianos, warm textures, elegant harmonic movement, and pristine production aesthetics. Fans of heavier styles will love our new glam metal (13), capturing the flashy, high-energy sound of ’80s arena-ready guitar rock. We also have a set of rootsy modern-folk rock (18), with a warm, organic sound combining contemporary folk textures and driving acoustic strumming. And we’ve added lots of new modern pop styles (16) — the kinds of sounds you’re hearing on the radio today, featuring exciting new drums, synths, and cutting-edge RealTracks arrangements.

Country, & Americana (Sets 483–488):
Our new country & Americana RealTracks deliver a rich collection of acoustic, electric, and roots-inspired styles! We have new country pop (9) with legendary guitarist Brent Mason. There is also a potpourri (14) of bouzouki, guitars, banjo, and more, perfect for adding texture and character to contemporary acoustic arrangements. We’ve added funky country guitar (5) with PG favorite Brent Mason, along with classic pedal steel styles (5) featuring steel great Doug Jernigan. There are more country songwriter styles (8) that provide intimate, rootsy foundations for storytelling and modern Americana writing. Finally, we have “background soloing” acoustic guitar (12) with Brent Mason — simpler, but still very tasty acoustic lines designed to sit beautifully behind vocals or act as a subtle standalone solo part.

Check out all the 202 new RealTracks (in sets 468-488)!

And, if you are looking for more, the 2026 49-PAK (for $49) includes an impressive collection of 20 bonus RealTracks, featuring exciting and inspiring additions to add to your RealTracks library. You'll get new country-rhythm guitar styles from PG Music favorites Johnny Hiland and Brent Mason, along with modern-pop grooves that capture today’s radio-ready sound! There are also new indie-folk styles with guitar, bass, 6-string bass used as a high-chording instrument, acoustic guitar, and banjo. Plus, dedicated "cymbal fills" RealDrums provide an added layer that work very well with low-key folky styles with other percussion.

The 2026 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2026 49-PAK!

Forum Statistics
Forums57
Topics86,556
Posts806,638
Members40,155
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
Newest Members
BaconBarney, Madge, lucdaron, JuanFontanez, Danibel
40,154 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 112
rsdean 78
WaoBand 56
Today's Birthdays
david27, Hazadrielle
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5