LOL I came here to ask if S1 has any information now on it's scripting.
Originally Posted By: MusicStudent
Originally Posted By: DebMurphy
When I was looking for a DAW was when this forum started to light up with coding to get something to work with Reaper and Band In A Box.

...Deb


Sorry to hear that, unfortunately we have no control over all that nonsense.


Originally Posted By: musocity
Studio One is a DAW if that's what you use. Everything needs to be coded Biab, Studio One that's how you have them. If I code a script for Reaper or a Autohotkey script I code that freely for users, they don't need to do the coding.
You have so many functions and features in Biab now that you use that came about by me "coding" things and showing them working and that they can be implemented into Biab/BBPlugin/BBPlugin Standalone. You also have scripting in Studio One for a reason (so guys like me can make up scripts for users to get Biab chords to and from Studio One).
If I wasn't here posting there is SO many features in Biab and a Plugin you simply would not have.


It's funny how users ask for things and I have helped them out so many times, whether it's getting midi chord markers in scaler or making an Autohotkey script for them to use in RealBand or so many other things, but you ask them for help and you get ZERO and just get used.
Why have you got a BBPlugin now ??? where did that come from ??? why have you got so many features in Biab that you now use ???
It's death at it's best with ZERO awareness, the blind leading the blind.
It's only going to come back and bite, only then will the learning kick in.
Again and Again it's the main reason Biab has been held back in the past, old guard holding it back. Krystal Audio Engine 2004 (Studio Zero) it had non destructive editing and played files direct, where were you guys then ? you sure weren't giving this info to PG, you have just held it back to the current state it's in because you didn't open your mouth and those that did were cancelled and got rid of through protectionism, ask yourself.
Wake up guys to the reason I'm here, before the big wake up call comes.
The forum don't "light up", the forum is dead if you haven't noticed.
LOL there are more posts in just the Reaper scripting forum.
I have looked for info on Studio One scripting but there is none WHY ?
I have been over the Ardour forum trying to get them to create a GUI for their Lua scripting bindings as they only allow you to add a few scripts to the script menu.

Originally Posted By: Matt Finley
Very good. And thank you, Andrew. That’s good news.

Again I have been posting all that info for years n years, the very "coding" they are complaining about but if PG post it only then is it legit, wow thanks PG we didn't know that, honestly ? ask yourself. It's the same deal with Playable RealTracks "wow PG thanks, we didn't know that could be done. Again another example of me posting all the information on how to do this years n years before, but unless it's PG it's not legit, just a crazy coding loony frown

Originally Posted By: MarioD
Dan, IMHO it is not nonsense. It is just forum members trying to improve PGMusic products. It can be in the forum of coding suggestions, trying to solve other members' problems, or through the wish list forum.

Mario knows what the story is as his eyes and heart are open.

Originally Posted By: rayc
[
This wasn't about Reaper but about making BIAB work better with ANY DAW - the case study has been Reaper becasue that's the one the code writer works in.
musocity is frustrated with the lack of progress by BIAB in general integration terms. I use Reaper and read all of his posts but have only employed one aspect as I don't have his frustration levels using the two programs.
The very good mix & mastering engineer from White Sea Studio, who is now on youtube, uses Reaper. It suits his work flow, matches industry standards and allows him to communicate with a wider audience.
Kenny & Cockos have joined together to provide stellar support for Reaper. If they sold a DVD set I'd buy it.

exactly !