Originally Posted By: Guitarhacker
Originally Posted By: MarioD


I respectfully disagree with my friend Herb. If you have a say BiaB piano track that sounds great as is then yes Herb's method is OK. But a dull BiaB track converted to an audio track it will be a dull audio track. For example you have a sax track that is dull, that is no pitch bend, volume changes, or vibrato your sax audio track will be dull, regardless of the price of the MIDI sound source. But you can bring that MIDI track to life with the addition of subtle pitch bends, volume changes and vibrato. Then you convert that live sax track to a live audio track.



About what? I'm missing the point or something. What do you disagree about?

All I mentioned was:
1. Get the notes in by any means possible
2. You can convert the midi to audio by freezing and it works like any other audio file.
3. You can change the key of the keyboard to make things easier.


This is the line that I was talking about "Once you have the parts.... you can convert it into audio and work with it like any other file. I have never, not even once, used any of the midi CC controllers in any of my songs. Never." A static BiaB MIDI track when convert will be a static audio track. Adding various CCs will add realism to said static track, this is especially true with guitar, bass, and horn tracks.

In my mind your statement gave the idea that you do not need CCs, which of course I disagree. If I am wrong then I apologize.

Last edited by MarioD; 07/23/23 03:01 AM.
When you are at the checkout line and they ask if you found everything say "Why, are you hiding stuff?"

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware