Originally Posted By: Bob Calver
......................
and i agree with Rob Helms that if people looked in greater detail they'd appreciate BIAB. but it does take work and effort. but if it was any easier it would be less capable.

...................


Bob, I agree that if people looked deeper into Biab they would appreciate it more, but I disagree with the "but if it was any easier it would be less capable" statement. Says who? With PGMusic's convoluted menus and terminology it can be hard for a beginner to get interested in BiaB. Year after year there are many questions on what each package contains, i.e. Pro is an entry level package here but all other companies Pro is the top of the line package. How many cut and paste options do we need? Why are there two print menus? Etc etc. IMHO the menus, BiaB, and packaging needs to be updated and streamlined.

For example my DAW, Studio One Pro, is extremely easy to use and in fact I started using it without reading any documentation. As I got comfortable with it I started to dig deeper into it. BiaB should be that easy.

Don't get me wrong. Virtually all of my songs start in BiaB and as you probably know most all are MIDI. I get out of BiaB ASAP because it is much easier for me to do my MIDI and audio editing in Studio One Pro.

YMMV

When you are at the checkout line and they ask if you found everything say "Why, are you hiding stuff?"

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware