Originally Posted By: MarioD

For example my DAW, Studio One Pro, is extremely easy to use and in fact I started using it without reading any documentation. As I got comfortable with it I started to dig deeper into it. BiaB should be that easy.

+1 and spot on. My experience is similar:
a. Some difficulty in climbing the BiaB learning curve, yet it's power is self-evident
b. No problem in learning the intuitive and clean design of Studio One and is also powerful

Here is my concern. As a technocrat and one who casually follows innovation, it is likely that a company in this business space may "sense blood in the water" and produce a product that will directly and successfully compete with BiaB. I hope this doesn't happen as I have come to respect PG Music and its flagship product in a big way. However, the entry bar to enter this business space has recently been lowered in a major way. It is no longer required to retain a large department of coders and suffer with development times measured in years. I recently viewed a technical video that demonstrates how ChatGPT can actually write computer code that can exceed the quality produced by seasoned professional computer programmers. This is hugely significant.

https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677
BiaB 2025 Windows
For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.