Jeff.
re arming tracks for a multi input scheme.
Very good point you made about arming tracks.
so if one is recording from 16 interface audio inputs it means a user has to arm 16 individual tracks in rb which takes longer than just one and
do the consecutive idea.

so haveing thought about the above and your points i cant think of a perfect solution no matter the solution implemented.
a classic catch 22. ...cos i'm thinking about in the future as computers get even more powerfull eg quantum.
in the future if one were recording from a 128 input interface eg an orchestral date ...it would be a pain individually going thru 128 tracks in rb and arming each.
which makes me wonder how are other daws gonna handle a large number of inputs interface or lets consider a usb mixer with a slew of channels.

kudos Jeff ..good thinking mate.
lol...i'm now gonna take a bath and think about this conundrum.
maybe one idea might be , the user sets up a template whereby the rb tracks are pre armed and routing from interface to rb track is pre determined ?
yep thd time to arm 8 tracks is nothing compared to 64 or 128 tracks
in the future.

happiness.

om

mcity ..yep im very keen on rb becoming wonderfull cos it has sooo much potential imho. my apologies...i wasnt aware about the history of all these aspects.
maybe im too ardent in wanting rb to really make inroads in the daw user community.

i see what jeff is getting at re time to arm lots of tracks and deal with routing of each..which becomes more and more time consuming the more io the interface has.
tis a conundrum...lol.

best regards mcity and i wish i had your graphic skills.

om

Last edited by justanoldmuso; 11/11/23 04:01 PM.
my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs
(90 songs created useing bb/rb)
(lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)