Rharv.

re your time....yeah i get it.
i think pg needs to do vids showing advanced aspects
of rb...because there is sooo much to like.
and thus might get more users realising various advantages of
rb over even expensive daws like the one i looked at recently.

as to odd time sigs...i agree....its a very complex subject,
and i wonder how much can be done in programming code to keep
users happy.
which probably explains why pg programmers chose the current
implementation route they did in bb.
the added complication being auto accompany
versus a straight daw that doesnt have auto accompany.
only pg can comment as its their code...but...maybe if pg
explained to bb users why they took the route they did...
ie the existing paradigm bar wise..maybe it would help users
to understand its not a trivial topic as you pointed out.
the devils in the programming details i suspect.
i also suspect that its easier to program for odd time sigs
where all tracks are midi rather than a mix of midi and audio
tracks. the audio tracks and track generation introducing
another level of complexity as well as time stretching and
fractional tempos ?

what i'm getting at...in conclusion...is....one just cant say
well 'xyz daw' can do something...so why cant bb ??
because...a traditional daw doesnt have to do what bb does behind the
scenes in the background. its a simpler programming environment
for daw programmers than bb i would suggest from my tech background.
a basic daw paradigm is filling audio buffers before they are needed
cos win isnt a real time os. whereas bb has added tasks to do also.

i hope pg read this and comment why users needs for odd time sigs
introduces various challenges re low level programming code.

maybe i'm wrong...but sometimes in the past in systems development
ive found there are no perfect solutions to make users happy.
only sometimes compromises.
SO...in this case maybe more detailed bar graphics showing cel
divisions per the way notes does things in his mind.?
i'm the same...for me on screen improved bar cel graphics would
help me also.

ps...fyi...i'm testing out an el cheapo fits in your hand minisforum 140 buck fanless pc currently.
has surprised me. win boots fast after some tweaks plus its working grrreat for normal
apps like net/office that dont need lots of cpu power.
i wouldnt use it for serious music production due to the low single thread count etc.
but...imho...the writing is on the wall i reckon and apple had better be carefull much as i like their M serious processors...cos if these little mini pc's get 'souped up' to say 4ghz watch out world.
for such a low price. next 5 yrs gonna be interesting.

happiness.

om

Last edited by justanoldmuso; 07/27/24 06:07 AM.
my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs
(90 songs created useing bb/rb)
(lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)