Rustyspoon: my thought is that AI should be employed when the attributes are assigned to a particular song, and that would be well before it was published to BIAB. It would be done at the same time that the attributes: Lite Pop, 4/4, Ev16 etc. were assigned to the song, so that when the search was done, it would list the Uke styles at or near the top. You wouldn't need the internet at that point.

Andrew: absolutely the style filters are correct. But no matter how accurate they are, they won't pick up the most appropriate style. Perhaps the Style db (or whatever is being used) just needs more fields, or columns. Sure you could filter further as you (and others here) have suggested, but that doesn't solve the underlying problem. I looked up my BIAB file for this song. The style shows "_UKES140.STY".

Charlie: (see my response to Rusty above). The AI would already have happened, done at the time the attributes were assigned, NOT at the time you went to pick a style.

All I'm trying to point out here is, there's obviously a REAL person involved when a song is added to the BIAB db. That person has to listen to the song, by the ascribed artist, and make a determination as to what attributes need to assigned, so that the Style Picker has something to work with. Why not use AI at that point and have it figure MORE about the song to make a better determination as to what Style would work.

LLOYD S