Originally Posted by justanoldmuso
CAN WE CONCLUDE THAT TO DO 48 RB IS A GOOD SOLUTION ??
Yes.

Originally Posted by Gordon Scott
As BiaB seems to work only at 44.1kHz, I imagine the recorded-audio conversion is done at record time, rather than save time.
I believe so.

Originally Posted by Gordon Scott
Why/how are WAS and MME different from ASIO in regards of sampling rate, please? Is the resampling done within the driver/API, rather than by BiaB?
I'm not certain, but I believe the resampling is always done at the driver level. Resampling is only necessary when using a shared sound device, as applications might send audio at different rates (and certainly not synchronized). ASIO was never designed to be a shared device, as it was intended that the output of an application would be routed directly to the interface bypassing the Windows audio systems. Any audio device that supports multiple clients using ASIO is essentially using a hack of sorts to make that work (I believe those essentially set up invisible virtual inputs to a software mixer, but I'm not sure).

Either way, since ASIO applications expect to be locked to the device, ASIO doesn't do resampling - this is why BB changes the interface sample rate when using ASIO, otherwise it would either not work at all, play back at a different pitch/speed, or destroy your ears with horrible digital noise.

I work here