Re BB.

yes bb needs to progress...i do agree but at the same time i see what charlie is getting at.

my own major concern is from a software engineering technical viewpoint ie...will additional feature implementations result in a code base that is very difficult to maintain and will the added features result in bb not being useable on old clunky pc's that a lot of project studios still use.

i worry like in industry ive seen if more and more features will result in bb haveing probs running on old clunky pc's. so then users will complain that they are being forced into pricey new pc's etc.
often this stuff is a catch 22 for a developer with a huge variety of users all over the world. whatever a dev does someone wont be happy.


personally i feel keeping bb to its core mission of auto accompany and adding fancy daw features to rb might be a valid alternative thinking about it.
there are lots of added features i would like but i ask myself as many are daw features isnt rb a better vehicle ??


merry xmas.

om

Last edited by justanoldmuso; 12/09/24 01:36 PM.
my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs
(90 songs created useing bb/rb)
(lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)