Originally Posted by Rustyspoon#
What I really can't understand - the pushback against "DAW features" in BIAB...
What exactly are people talking about? What NEW features that are being proposed are not part of BIAB already that few people are so afraid of? Please be very specific. No soap operas please.

The way I see it, 90% of what is asked by users is enhancing workflow - like moving away from labyrinth of pop up menus to non modal panels, consistency, finishing existing features to accepted standards - and flexibility of UI. Where is the evil DAW hiding?

Misha my friend in all do respect why reinvent the wheel? RB is a DAW without some of the the limitations of BiaB so instead of turning BiaB into a DAW why not add BiaB to a DAW, i.e. RB?

Yes those enhancing workflows are great suggestions. IMHO the "evil DAW" is hiding in the tracks view. I know PGM is trying to please everyone but adding that track view had invited many suggestions on how to improve it, thus leaning BiaB into a DAW. IMHO keep BiaB as the perfect backing track generator and let DAWs do the DAW stuff. YMMV


I got banned from Weight Watchers for dropping a bag of M&Ms on the floor.
It was the best game of Hungry Hippos I've ever seen!


64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware