Originally Posted by Rustyspoon#
Mario,
Ok now I see your point, but here is the deal. If I am correct, you are using about 20% RTs - rest MIDI. I am mirror opposite. To me, Track view combined with partial regeneration is a blessing / an indispensable tool working with Real Tracks. Most people (not all) use BIAB specifically for realistic sounding tracks.

I didn't ask for T.View. It arrived as a wonderful surprise. As of now its simply incomplete. Why castrate
something that is not interfering with anything else? It just needs to be completed in the spirit of accepted standards, especially if 90% functions are already present, but not hooked up the right way.

Misha, I now see your point. If you eliminate the RT charts from the equation my actual use of RTs is around 1%.

Unfortunately just about every new feature in BiaB is incomplete is one way or another, i.e. utility tracks, track views, the VSTi, etc.

I see and respect your views but I still think putting the entire BiaB into RB, modernizing and improving RB's GUI and putting the entire BiaB sans DAW features like the t-view into the VSTi are better moves. Just my opinion.

Have a great day my friend.

I got banned from Weight Watchers for dropping a bag of M&Ms on the floor.
It was the best game of Hungry Hippos I've ever seen!


64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware