Hey Everybody,

Thanks for all of these helpful comments.

Charlie I will answer your question in a second, but first I will have to say I am more confused than ever now I checked the original BIAB tempo.

The song was recorded at 90 BPM.

The stem maker when I chose "create new song" and "stem" and "import" did all of that and set the tempo at 110.

When I play the stems and new generated tracks back they sound fine, but it is definitely playing a song at 90, not 110 bpm. even though BIAB is showing 110.

When I let the "master stem play" (the original) it also seems to be in 90 bpm like the stems, but comes in 2 beats later than the stems.

You got me.

Now for Charlie.

Charlie, in using the word "tick" it is something I have heard but it may not be the right term.

Somewhere in each DAW you will have two measurements.

1.) Hr, Min, Second, millisecond (self explanatory)

2.) Measure, Beat and a number after that from 1-120. I have heard that number described as "tick"--like measure 5, beat 4, tick 78...

If that is not the right word, I would love to know the right one.

Anyway, when I am cutting and pasting I always want to paste to the exact "tick."

In the song I described above, the beginning of bar 1 lands perfectly on the 1.

Therefore when I used ACW and was very careful to put the line at the beginning as close as I could to the exact beginning of the audio sound. I do not believe I could have made it more precise.

However, when I had the stems in place, and then generated new tracks with a style, it did not line up right. It was slightly off.

Also, I think there is a switch someone to get BIAB to ignore the 2 bar click as part of the equation, and if you don't the new generated tracks come in 2 bars later than the audio. I used to know where that was but I can't remember where that is now...

Thanks if you have any ideas!!