Rharv.

re delphi...thats a great point youve made.
but what i'm grappling with is what features are missing from delphi that would make c/c++ a better solution ?
i would love to know pg's viewpoint as to why C/C++ werent used.
as i understand it one advantage of delphi is those C++ headers.

in the end whatever the compiler used the devs would need to interface with the win api's//audio api's...no ??

i'm gonna delve more as to if in fact c/c++ is better for daw coding/development than delphi.
maybe JY can jump in. as to a perspective.

...........................................................

on another matter for people/lurkers wanting to do ritardandos...
noel has a tip which would suggest that rb is the better vehicle.
the fill feature is very nice...and i'm kicking my A cos i didnt think to mention it.
kudos noel....heres the link....

https://www.pgmusic.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=863843#Post863843

heres another poser...why do people use rb over say the new bb plugin ??
reason i ask is i keep on coming back to rb.
ps..i love aussies.

happiness to all.

om

Last edited by justanoldmuso; 09/29/25 05:51 PM.

my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs
(90 songs created useing bb/rb)
(lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)