Originally Posted by Guitarhacker
It's not so much about using AI tracks.... Well, it is, they don't want that but using AI to help in any way such as a cover where you end up keeping lets say the melody that is fully or partially an AI generated melody also qualifies.
To clarify, I created the melody.
Gave me great artistic satisfaction.
AI only generates a vocal track, copying the melody that I supply, for the purpose of presenting it to a human vocalist, so they can learn nthe song more easily.
My plan is to ask AI to generate backing tracks in a style that I like.
Then I go to a producer on Upwork and request a backing that is as close as possible to the AI demo that I provide.
I also post a job looking for a vocalist who can provide a track of just the melody.

Originally Posted by Guitarhacker
I guess it's down to exactly how honest are you going to be with the publisher. Will they know or find out? Probably not.
If publishers can't tell what is generated by AI, then how could potential litigants tell?

Originally Posted by Guitarhacker
Regarding the 3 tracks. To my ears it sounds like A&C could contain AI whereas B sounded like a demo. I only listened to a few seconds of each in my comparison.
Correct, GuitarHacker. Version B is the "demo" I created a few years ago, thinking it was broadcast quality. No AI there.