|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,018
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,018 |
Yes, I use the pentatonic scales a lot in both my guitar and bass playing. Also look into the blues scale.: https://www.guitarcommand.com/blues-scale-bass/#c-blues-scale-bass
It takes courage for a man to admit his wife was wrong.
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,445
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,445 |
I read once that the oldest instrument to be found, a bone with holes in it, plays a pentatonic scale. I also read that most cultures have independently come up with the pentatonic scale, it's just that they don't always start on the same note.
The major pentatonic in C is the minor pentatonic in A.
This tells me there is something organic about the pentatonic scale.
I use them a lot in my improvisations, sometimes mixing minor and major, depending on the song. Perhaps over half. Why? The audience seems to like it.
Charlie Parker played a lot of major pentatonic, even though he was a bebop player.
I discovered minor pentatonic, on sax when I was a child, in a rock band. Added flat 5 and 9 for passing or tension, and transposed to all keys (unlike the guitar, the fingering for each key is different). I've built on from there throughout my life, but I can always depend on the pentatonic to keep me grounded.
Insights and incites by Notes ♫
Bob "Notes" Norton  Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com
100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,660
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,660 |
There's a good mapping between the overtone series and how we perceive harmonic tension. I have no doubt that's tied to the mechanics of how we decode pitch. Overtones (or higher harmonics) is what so many of us enjoy about the sound of musical instruments. Sure, pure tones as produced by synths are nice and have their place. But when even a single note is played on an instrument its overtones define the "color" or timbre of that instrument. The sweet metallic sound of a muted trumpet or the bow drawn across a string of a cello produce a series of harmonics specific to that instrument. I'm sure instrument designers have understood this for centuries.
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677BiaB 2025 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,015
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,015 |
Overtones (or higher harmonics) is what so many of us enjoy about the sound of musical instruments. Sure, pure tones as produced by synths are nice and have their place.
But when even a single note is played on an instrument its overtones define the "color" or timbre of that instrument. The sweet metallic sound of a muted trumpet or the bow drawn across a string of a cello produce a series of harmonics specific to that instrument. I'm sure instrument designers have understood this for centuries. Yes, you can use and Fourier Transform to show the harmonic makeup of instrument timbre. But I doubt that "instrument designers have understood this for centuries" helped in the design of instrument. Rather, it was the general guidelines of mechanics, such as the type of bore (cylindrical vs. conical) and instrument materials that guided designers. Additionally, most changes to instruments were incremental changes, such as the Boehm fingering system, which built on other similar developments. Even the saxophone was an extension of prior designs. But that's not what I was talking about. I was addressing that question you had about the perception of consonance and dissonance - especially in the pentatonic scale - and what the basis was. The properties of the overtone series of come from physics, as does how our hearing works. They are inextricably linked together. The fact that melodic and harmonic systems have been developed that match properties of these overtone ([i]i.e.[i] being able to come up with a measure of harmonic consonance using the series) as well as being able to fill in the scale via the Circle of Fifths makes - to my mind, anyway - a compelling argument that this isn't something that's based in neurology.
-- David Cuny My virtual singer development blogVocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?BiaB 2025 | Windows 11 | Reaper | Way too many VSTis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,660
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,660 |
Yes, you can use and Fourier Transform to show the harmonic makeup of instrument timbre. But I doubt that "instrument designers have understood this for centuries" helped in the design of instrument.
The properties of the overtone series of come from physics, as does how our hearing works. They are inextricably linked together. The fact that melodic and harmonic systems have been developed that match properties of these overtone ([i]i.e.[i] being able to come up with a measure of harmonic consonance using the series) as well as being able to fill in the scale via the Circle of Fifths makes - to my mind, anyway - a compelling argument that this isn't something that's based in neurology. When I say that instrument designers have understood harmonics for centuries, I wasn’t referring to a Fourier analysis understanding. Fourier invented Fourier analysis in the 1800s. Rather I was referring to the knowledge and skill that craftsmen in Europe and elsewhere had in building instruments centuries ago. The harpsichord for example was invented in the late 1300s and around that time they had an understanding of how string length, string tension, materials, soundboard thickness, ribbing and other parameters had on the overall sound quality and hence harmonics of the instrument they were building. It was a slow, grinding process and I’m sure trial and error was a major tool in their toolbox. But I agree, all this is not the subject of the book. From what I understand at this point, the concepts of consonance and dissonance appear as an outcome of neurological processing resulting in to what degree we find a given audio input as pleasing. Another non-Boolean spectrum where we have degrees of pleasing (or non-pleasing) audio inputs. Certainly, without physics, there would be no pressure fluctuations and no sound. So physics provides the input. But the brain needs to interpret said input. I doubt a tree could perceive the difference between musical consonance and musical dissonance, much less prefer one over the other. So I would say that neurology does play a major role.
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677BiaB 2025 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,015
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,015 |
From what I understand at this point, the concepts of consonance and dissonance appear as an outcome of neurological processing resulting in to what degree we find a given audio input as pleasing. Another non-Boolean spectrum where we have degrees of pleasing (or non-pleasing) audio inputs. I don't know that's something that's generally accepted. That consonant and dissonant intervals align closely to physical phenomena - such as the overtone series and beating - would put a strong weight towards physical explanation, rather than a neurological one. The concept of a critical band is well known, where frequencies are "close enough" that the ear can't distinguish between them. The psycho-acoustic phenomena of masking is when weaker harmonic signals that are "masked" by stronger, nearby harmonic signal and thus not heard. Audio compression algorithms take advantage of this by removing the weaker harmonic signals, thus reducing the signal complexity. Similarly, it is hypothesized that different tones that lie in the same critical band are perceived as dissonant. The timbre of tones will come into play, as richer timbres with more overtones will share more critical bands. In short, although it's been known the ratio has been a factor in how consonant an interval is likely to be heard, it's only relatively recently that we've identified a probably underlying physical explanation in the auditory systems. Critical bands provide this sort of explanation. Obviously, hearing consonance in music instead of simple intervals is more complex.
-- David Cuny My virtual singer development blogVocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?BiaB 2025 | Windows 11 | Reaper | Way too many VSTis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,660
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,660 |
I don't know that's something that's generally accepted. I really can’t speak to what is generally accepted. I’m sure there is much research ongoing. But when I connect the dots that I’m familiar with it seems that our neural processors prefer patterns that are easy to process. Complex ratios create irregular patterns resulting in dissonance while simple ratios produce pleasing neural firings resulting in consonance. But expectation and familiarity also come into play and hence historical and cultural principles must be factors. As a very simple example, this may be why bands like the Beatles, Eagles and other artists that write “easy to digest” music are more popular than bands like Yes or ELP. This may also explain why many (including myself) don’t understand and can’t appreciate some forms of jazz. Out to Lunch I could only listen for the 1st minute or so. Critical bands and more broadly, the fact that our auditory system is a highly sophisticated transducer which transforms sound pressure waves into an understandable phenomenon we call music is quite interesting. The Wiki page amplifies the point that we have filters in our auditory system. Indeed, I wouldn’t be surprised if we have dozens of “filters” and probably as many “descrete processors” that make up the total signal chain. And I’m guessing that this signal chain is not a simple serial chain but a distributed chain with parallel and feedback loops involving long and short-term memory. There is a LOT going on that we all take for granted.
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677BiaB 2025 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,018
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,018 |
This is called free form jazz or free jazz. It is where jazz musicians break virtually every rule: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_jazzThis is what I was talking about during one of our conversations about breaking the rules. This is not one of my favorite jazz genres but I can listen to it as I have listened to this entire song. I was exposed to jazz at an early age. In fact when other guitarist were listening to Jimi, Cream, etc I was listening to Coltrane, Cannonball, Miles, etc. I think a lot of the "easy to digest" pop/rock/rap songs are because a lot of people have not been exposed to other forms of music. Back in the 1960's, before corporate music took over the industry, FM radio played all music genres. You could get everything from folk, country, jazz, classical and everything in between. That does not exist today, at least not is the same quantities. But don't get me wrong as some people would listen and not like jazz, country, rap, etc. Its just a personal choice. YMMV
It takes courage for a man to admit his wife was wrong.
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,660
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,660 |
This is called free form jazz or free jazz. It is where jazz musicians break virtually every rule:
I think a lot of the "easy to digest" pop/rock/rap songs are because a lot of people have not been exposed to other forms of music. You may be onto something. Could it be that I'm a "rule follower" in music because if the rules are broken I don't understand the result? And could it be that I don't understand broken rules because I was never exposed to them in my musical formative years? Make no mistake, just because I don't understand free form or other types of music doesn't necessarily mean I don't admire those rule breakers for their talent. As a matter of fact, for decades I've often lamented the fact that others could understand "broken rule music" while I couldn't, even though Yes and ELP were amoung my favorite bands. I suppose that on the rule-breaking spectrum, Yes and ELP are probably light weights. And I wonder how "edge" plays into all this
https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677BiaB 2025 Windows For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,018
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,018 |
This is called free form jazz or free jazz. It is where jazz musicians break virtually every rule:
I think a lot of the "easy to digest" pop/rock/rap songs are because a lot of people have not been exposed to other forms of music. You may be onto something. Could it be that I'm a "rule follower" in music because if the rules are broken I don't understand the result? And could it be that I don't understand broken rules because I was never exposed to them in my musical formative years?............................. And I wonder how "edge" plays into all this I am a strong believer of teaching music and other art forms in middle to high school should be on all school's curriculum. That is where I learned about jazz and classical music. Early exposure to all art forms is necessary IMHO. You've got to admit that listening to free form jazz is very edgy - ducking and running for cover.
It takes courage for a man to admit his wife was wrong.
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,015
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,015 |
I really can’t speak to what is generally accepted. I’m sure there is much research ongoing. But when I connect the dots that I’m familiar with it seems that our neural processors prefer patterns that are easy to process. Complex ratios create irregular patterns resulting in dissonance while simple ratios produce pleasing neural firings resulting in consonance. I'm going to belabor the point a bit more. When you say "Complex ratios create irregular patterns", it feels like there's some handwaving going on. It's not as if our ears are sending pure signals to the brain, and the neurons are comparing pitch ratios. That's just not how hearing works. The processing of signal to pitch takes place in the ear, not in the brain. The ear functions as a pitch discriminator. However, there are limits to what pitches can be discriminated between. When two pitches fall within that margin - the critical band - they land on the same receptor. And that receptor complains I'm having trouble differentiating between these two pitches. That's a much simpler mechanism than what you seem to be proposing, and it seems to be borne out by studies. We have other examples of processing taking place at the sensor level, such as the eye. The image on the eye's receptors passes through multiple layers, and determinations are made at the within the eye, not the brain. For example, a frog's eyes has specialized "bug detectors" for detecting small moving shapes and "event detectors" for general movement. To reiterate, this processing happens in the frog's eye, not its brain. Music is much more than simply "consonance" and "dissonance". It's the creative use of these elements, structuring them in time and motion, as well as setting and sometimes evading expectations. But research indicates that that simple concept of "concept" and "dissonance" can be explained via critical bands within the ear, rather than a higher-level neural processing.
-- David Cuny My virtual singer development blogVocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?BiaB 2025 | Windows 11 | Reaper | Way too many VSTis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: AI Stems & Notes - split polyphonic audio into instruments and transcribe
This video demonstrates how to use the new AI-Notes feature together with the AI-Stems splitter, allowing you to select an audio file and have it separated into individual stems while transcribing each one to its own MIDI track. AI-Notes converts polyphonic audio—either full mixes or individual instruments—into MIDI that you can view in notation or play back instantly.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®
With your version 2026 for Windows Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- Android Band-in-a-Box® App (included)
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Video: New User Interface (GUI)
Join Tobin as he takes you on a tour of the new user interface in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®! This modern GUI redesign offers a sleek new look with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, and a smoother workflow. The brand-new side toolbar puts track selection, the MultiPicker Library, and other essential tools right at your fingertips. Plus, our upgraded Multi-View lets you layer multiple windows without overlap, giving you a highly flexible workspace. Many windows—including Tracks, Piano Roll, and more—have been redesigned for improved usability and a cleaner, more intuitive interface, and more!
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Introducing XPro Styles PAK 10 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 10 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 28 RealTracks and RealDrums!
Few things are certain in life: death, taxes, and a brand spankin’ new XPro Styles PAK! In this, the 10th edition of our XPro Styles PAK series, we’ve got 100 styles coming your way! We have the classic 25 styles each from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, and rounding out this volume's wildcard slot is 25 styles in the Praise & Worship genre! A wide spanning genre, you can find everything from rock, folk, country, and more underneath its umbrella. The included 28 RealTracks and RealDrums can be used with any Band-in-a-Box® 2026 (and higher) package.
Here’s just a small sampling of what you can look forward to in XPro Styles PAK 10: Soft indie folk worship songs, bumpin’ country boogies, gospel praise breaks, hard rockin’ pop, funky disco grooves, smooth Latin jazz pop, bossa nova fusion, western swing, alternative hip-hop, cool country funk, and much more!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 10 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 10 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Introducing Xtra Styles PAK 21 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest Xtra Styles PAK installment—the all new Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher)!
Rejoice, one and all, for Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box® is here! We’re serving up 200 brand spankin’ new styles to delight your musical taste buds! The first three courses are the classics you’ve come to know and love, including offerings from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, but, not to be outdone, this year’s fourth course is bro country! A wide ranging genre, you can find everything from hip-hop, uptempo outlaw country, hard hitting rock, funk, and even electronica, all with that familiar bro country flair. The dinner bell has been rung, pickup up Xtra Styles PAK 21 today!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Energetic folk rock, raucous train beats, fast country boogies, acid jazz grooves, laid-back funky jams, a bevy of breezy jazz waltzes, calm electro funk, indie synth pop, industrial synth metal, and more bro country than could possibly fit in the back of a pickup truck!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 21 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 21 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 21.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 21 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 21 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Introducing XPro Styles PAK 10 – Now Available for Mac Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 10 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 28 RealTracks and RealDrums!
Few things are certain in life: death, taxes, and a brand spankin’ new XPro Styles PAK! In this, the 10th edition of our XPro Styles PAK series, we’ve got 100 styles coming your way! We have the classic 25 styles each from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, and rounding out this volume's wildcard slot is 25 styles in the Praise & Worship genre! A wide spanning genre, you can find everything from rock, folk, country, and more underneath its umbrella. The included 28 RealTracks and RealDrums can be used with any Band-in-a-Box® 2026 (and higher) package.
Here’s just a small sampling of what you can look forward to in XPro Styles PAK 10: Soft indie folk worship songs, bumpin’ country boogies, gospel praise breaks, hard rockin’ pop, funky disco grooves, smooth Latin jazz pop, bossa nova fusion, western swing, alternative hip-hop, cool country funk, and much more!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 10 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 10 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Introducing Xtra Styles PAK 21 – Now Available for Mac Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest Xtra Styles PAK installment—the all new Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher)!
Rejoice, one and all, for Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box® is here! We’re serving up 200 brand spankin’ new styles to delight your musical taste buds! The first three courses are the classics you’ve come to know and love, including offerings from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, but, not to be outdone, this year’s fourth course is bro country! A wide ranging genre, you can find everything from hip-hop, uptempo outlaw country, hard hitting rock, funk, and even electronica, all with that familiar bro country flair. The dinner bell has been rung, pickup up Xtra Styles PAK 21 today!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Energetic folk rock, raucous train beats, fast country boogies, acid jazz grooves, laid-back funky jams, a bevy of breezy jazz waltzes, calm electro funk, indie synth pop, industrial synth metal, and more bro country than could possibly fit in the back of a pickup truck!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 21 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 21 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 21.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 21 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 21 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics85,292
Posts790,613
Members39,854
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean