Because somebody called two notes played simultaneously a chord but based on music theory that has been taught for years it takes three or more notes to form a chord.
Mario, David and rharv, with all due respect I must cast my lot with Adam Neely, Wikipedia and Dr Dan unless proven otherwise because it comes down to knowledge and trust. These 3 sources conclude that a chord is made up of 2 or more pitches.
Adam Neeley chooses his words
very carefully, is well-studied, is highly credentialed (Berklee College of Music and the Manhattan School of Music) and has lots to lose if he puts out bogus info. The guy is a music geek, and we need geeks! I’m unaware of anyone else on the internet in his lofty category. Do you?
Wikipedia also has strong credentials, is fact-checked by experts worldwide, is thoughtfully edited and is trusted by millions around the world.
Dr Dan is a smart guy too, I’ve never seen him give wrong info, and he chooses his words carefully. Although I don’t know his music credentials per-se, clearly he is well-studied in the subject.
What these 3 sources recognize is that any music theory truth goes beyond and transcends what one was taught by a childhood music teacher, or what one was taught in high school, or what one’s personal opinions may or may not be or even less-than-accurate websites that are casually uploaded. Music theory is a well thought out and established set of principles that over time “get written in stone”. I think I can say this even though I’m a beginner student of the subject myself.
Like I say, if someone can convincingly show credible evidence that a 2-pitch dyad can never be a chord, I’m all ears. Power chords (1-5) immediately come to mind.
Keep in mind, I’m not saying that said chord must be pleasing to the ear, unambiguous, make geometric sense on a guitar fretboard or any other artificial restriction.
If anyone disagrees, here is something to ponder. What “rule” in music theory prevents 2 pitches from being labeled a chord?