Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 470
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 470
Here's a recently released video from an experienced recording engineer and live performer, who also runs the URM Academy YouTube channel. He's used ProTools for many years, during which he completely dismissed Reaper. His explanation of his migration to Reaper is well worth the 14 minute watch. It even has me thinking about "do I really need to spend 150 € per year on Studio Pro (One) and another 150 € per year on Bitwig?". I bought a v6-v7 Reaper license for $60 in December of 2019, and Reaper's still got some v7 legs (v7.61 the last time I checked).


Last edited by TheMaartian; 02/12/26 07:17 AM.

ThinkPad i9 32GB RAM 7TB SSD; Win11 Pro; RME Fireface UCX II; BiaB 2026 Ultra
Studio Pro 8; Tonalic Studio 1; Reaper v7; Bitwig Studio 6; Melodyne Studio 5
Gig Performer 5; NI S61 MK3; Focal Shape 65; Beyerdynamic DT 880 & 770
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,614
Veteran
Online Content
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,614
Very interesting.
Thanx for sharing.


Back in my day the only time we started panic buying was when the bartender shouted "last call"!

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,928
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,928
Amen!
I started out with ProTools back in the mid 90's. But after a few years, PT left me when they became equipment specific. At that time I found Reaper and have never looked back. I actually try not to advocate for Reaper here in this forum. I don't want to be one of those guys who just hypes a specific DAW and tell everyone how great their DAW is. So I don't want to be the one to tell you that Reap is the greatest, but, Reap is the greatest. grin

Last edited by DrDan; 02/13/26 12:46 PM.

BIAB – 2026, Reaper (current), i7-12700F Processor, 32GB DDR4-3200MHz RAM, Motu Audio Express 6x6 - My SoundCloud.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 1,126
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 1,126
I started learning how to use a DAW more intently about 5 years ago and have moved between Cakewalk by Bandlab - Cakewalk Sonar - Reaper. I recently ditched Cakewalk because all their previous core plugins disappeared - it might be an issue at my end, but I am highly suspicious that I am being moved from their free tier into a subscription. Being a retiree, I am on a tight budget, so these were a good fit. As I’ve gone in deeper, I am finding Reaper has a lot of standard plugins that I don’t need to buy elsewhere - not sure if they’re top shelf quality but they do the job for me …
  • ReaTune - I use for manual pitch correction - don’t have to pay for Melodyne
  • JS De-esser- just yesterday, I needed to de-ess for the first time, and Reaper has it!
  • LUFS - Reaper’s render feature has click and LUFS monitoring built in, so when I have my first draft mix done, I do a dry/trial render to see where everything is.
  • Stretch markers - for alignment of vocal and guitar phrasing

As I learn or become aware of new techniques or issues to address, I am finding Reaper usually has something on hand.
Andrew

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,543
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,543
Originally Posted by Andrew Dee
I started learning how to use a DAW more intently about 5 years ago and have moved between Cakewalk by Bandlab - Cakewalk Sonar - Reaper. I recently ditched Cakewalk because all their previous core plugins disappeared - it might be an issue at my end, but I am highly suspicious that I am being moved from their free tier into a subscription. Being a retiree, I am on a tight budget, so these were a good fit. As I’ve gone in deeper, I am finding Reaper has a lot of standard plugins that I don’t need to buy elsewhere - not sure if they’re top shelf quality but they do the job for me …

Andrew,

I don't know if you've discovered Kenny Gioia yet or not. He has an amazing understanding of Reaper and a tonne of videos that explains his understanding. I use Reaper and find it excellent to work with.

https://www.youtube.com/@REAPERMania/featured

--Noel


MY SONGS...
Audiophile BIAB 2026
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,894
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,894
Originally Posted by DC Ron
Just me, but our forum host makes a DAW, so it seems a little awkward promoting another vendor's DAW here.
I have tried the DAW you are referring to and I would argue that the forum host does NOT in fact have a DAW! Or, at least not one that could ever compete in the DAW industry!

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,614
Veteran
Online Content
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,614
When listening to a song one can not tell if the song was recorded in a DAW or not. Every DAW has its pluses and minuses. So saying one DAW is better than another is just personal taste.

As far as posting information about DAWs on this site I think it is a good thing. For those whom want BiaB to become a full fledged DAW they can see what's out there. For PGM it might give them ideas to add to their products.

YMMV


Back in my day the only time we started panic buying was when the bartender shouted "last call"!

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,566
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,566
Originally Posted by DC Ron
Originally Posted by JohnJohnJohn
Originally Posted by DC Ron
Just me, but our forum host makes a DAW, so it seems a little awkward promoting another vendor's DAW here.
I have tried the DAW you are referring to and I would argue that the forum host does NOT in fact have a DAW! Or, at least not one that could ever compete in the DAW industry!

Maybe. Lots of RealBand fans on this forum, just like Reaper fans. They're both devoted and passionate, aren't they?

I used Reaper exclusively for about a week. Totally get the bells, whistles and "culture of customization" the influencer referenced. But Reaper is not much of a DAW for MY simple purposes either...

Dang right.
I'm old enough and been into computer music stuff since it pretty much started.
I had cakewalk and what was it, Dr T I think, back when floppies were the common way to get data/applications..
I discovered PowerTracks early on (ver 3 maybe) and it brought me in to the fold.

If you can't make a decent sounding song In PT/RB, the bells and whistles might as well be ornamental.
They are basic serviceable DAWs and both do things no other software can natively with the generate options.

Sure, I have used Reaper, actually have a license, but the end result can be indistinguishable between DAW A & B.
One may be more fun for you, another for Joe over there by the coffee (he's making me nervous) but they both work.


I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,894
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,894
Originally Posted by DC Ron
Originally Posted by JohnJohnJohn
Originally Posted by DC Ron
Just me, but our forum host makes a DAW, so it seems a little awkward promoting another vendor's DAW here.
I have tried the DAW you are referring to and I would argue that the forum host does NOT in fact have a DAW! Or, at least not one that could ever compete in the DAW industry!
Maybe. Lots of RealBand fans on this forum
It is a free included tool when you buy BIAB; they don't even try to sell it stand-alone, and for good reason! You'd be hard pressed to find many (any?) Realband users outside of the PGM universe! Why is that? How come Reaper fans or Ableton Live fans or BandLab fans or FL Studio fans or Reason fans or Logic Pro fans or Pro Tools fans aren't giving up their DAWs and flocking to Realband? I've tried it several times and concluded it is not even in the same class as the DAWs on the market.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,566
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,566
Originally Posted by JohnJohnJohn
Originally Posted by DC Ron
Originally Posted by JohnJohnJohn
Originally Posted by DC Ron
Just me, but our forum host makes a DAW, so it seems a little awkward promoting another vendor's DAW here.
I have tried the DAW you are referring to and I would argue that the forum host does NOT in fact have a DAW! Or, at least not one that could ever compete in the DAW industry!
Maybe. Lots of RealBand fans on this forum
It is a free included tool when you buy BIAB; they don't even try to sell it stand-alone, and for good reason! You'd be hard pressed to find many (any?) Realband users outside of the PGM universe! Why is that? How come Reaper fans or Ableton Live fans or BandLab fans or FL Studio fans or Reason fans or Logic Pro fans or Pro Tools fans aren't giving up their DAWs and flocking to Realband? I've tried it several times and concluded it is not even in the same class as the DAWs on the market.

That was one of the biggest loads of Gibberish I have seen here.
They sell Powertracks separate.
Realband is a merger of BiaB and Powertracks.

Why aren't Reaper fans flocking to Pro Tools?
Or FL Studio fans flocking to Reaper?

straw man much?


I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,640
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,640
daw vs daw...its like pc vs mac lol.
you can do great songs in any daw app these days imho.

I'm a Reaper user and also real band user and a band In A Box user.
I've used all three music apps on lots of songs.

Each has pluses and minuses.
Let me say real band does things that no other app I've seen does.

I use the strengths of each of the three apps.

I wonder how much the real band manual has been read by people who knock real band.... have they also gone through the extensive tips in real band ?

Yes real band has some quirks but if you're really willing to get stuck in it has some great unique features.

Om

Last edited by justanoldmuso; 02/13/26 06:48 AM.

my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs
(90 songs created useing bb/rb)
(lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,894
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,894
Originally Posted by rharv
That was one of the biggest loads of Gibberish I have seen here.
Almost as big a load as the idea that Realband could ever compete in the DAW marketplace as a standalone product!

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,628
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,628
Hey, I've deleted my posts, including the one where I said I was wrong. FWIW, nowhere in the deleted posts here was a statement that RealBand can compete as a standalone product. I only said our host makes it, and plenty of folks use it and like it. Or that's what I intended to say. No matter...

My sincere apologies to all for my offensive statements.

Still friends?

Last edited by DC Ron; 02/13/26 12:19 PM.

DC Ron
BiaB Audiophile
Presonus Studio One
ASUS I9-12900K DAW, 32 GB RAM
Presonus Faderport 16
Too many guitars (is that a thing?)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,894
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,894
Originally Posted by DC Ron
My sincere apologies to all for my offensive statements.

Still friends?
OK, I apologize as well as I am the resident Realband hater. If you use it and like it, all the more power to you! I would just advise any new BIAB user to at least try out other affordable DAW options in addition to trying out the free included one. Personally, after trying Realband every couple of years since I became a BIAB user 14 years ago, I have always found other DAWs to be superior.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,628
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,628
Originally Posted by JohnJohnJohn
Originally Posted by DC Ron
My sincere apologies to all for my offensive statements.

Still friends?
OK, I apologize as well as I am the resident Realband hater. If you use it and like it, all the more power to you! I would just advise any new BIAB user to at least try out other affordable DAW options in addition to trying out the free included one. Personally, after trying Realband every couple of years since I became a BIAB user 14 years ago, I have always found other DAWs to be superior.

Ha! I could never seriously use RealBand for music production either. It's amazing to me that so many do. But they do...


DC Ron
BiaB Audiophile
Presonus Studio One
ASUS I9-12900K DAW, 32 GB RAM
Presonus Faderport 16
Too many guitars (is that a thing?)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,614
Veteran
Online Content
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,614
Originally Posted by DC Ron
Originally Posted by JohnJohnJohn
Originally Posted by DC Ron
My sincere apologies to all for my offensive statements.

Still friends?
OK, I apologize as well as I am the resident Realband hater. If you use it and like it, all the more power to you! I would just advise any new BIAB user to at least try out other affordable DAW options in addition to trying out the free included one. Personally, after trying Realband every couple of years since I became a BIAB user 14 years ago, I have always found other DAWs to be superior.

Ha! I could never seriously use RealBand for music production either. It's amazing to me that so many do. But they do...

I have tried to use Realband but I could not get use to its workflow, especially after using a number of other DAWs. Cakewalk, Presonus Studio One Pro, and now Fender Studio Pro as well as a few others always seemed easier for me to use, i.e. it fit my workflow

BUT that is on me. I want to make music while I can and not try to learn a new DAW, especially when I have one I like and use now; that also includes not learning Reaper. Those whom use Realband took the time to learn all of its nuances and it works for their workflow.

As I have said you can't tell what DAW, if one was even used, was used when listening to a song.

YMMV


Back in my day the only time we started panic buying was when the bartender shouted "last call"!

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,566
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,566
Hey! I already admitted I use other products, I was just offended by someone saying PGMusic doesn't even offer a standalone DAW.
They do.
Like every other DAW; choose what works best for you for the need.
I have paid for other DAW licenses, so it's not like I am 'stuck' on RB, I just hate when people say "it's not a DAW" because it is.
So is Powertracks.

That argument is dumb, and I am no longer participating in it after this.


I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,640
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,640
John 3.

heres what i find baffling and please excuse my stupidity.
(recuperating from minor surgery.)

you hate rb right ?? but why dont you hate bb even more ?
given there there are features rb has that bb doesnt.
for example...

..rb tracks view is choc full of features re handling audio/midi
tracks compared to bb tracks view. (to be fair bb tracks view is new.)
..rb supports fractional tempos.
..odd time sigs support in rb.
for example in rb tracks view a user can see visually
every bars division...eg 6 or 8 or whatever.
not in bb.
..rb handling of 48k projects.
..rb supports multi input sound interfaces.

and i'm just getting started.
for a complete list i posted a long list on these forums of when rb should be considered over bb....might be usefull for new users...and lurkers.
https://www.pgmusic.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=859949#Post859949

some people have done over 80 songs in rb...can it really be that bad ??


now dont get me wrong...i like various aspects of bb.
one major one being the blink of an eye genning.
but then on the back end i have to wait a tad for track
creation prior to dragging into reaps.
while with rb the front end is a tad slower but i can drag tracks into
reaper lickety split.
frankly i love the combo of rb and reaper working together.


also if rb is so bad why do some mac users request rb be available
on the mac platform ?

john i'm not trying to upset anyone but i'm just curious why the hate for rb
over bb given the above ?

happiness.

om

Last edited by justanoldmuso; 02/14/26 06:19 AM.

my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs
(90 songs created useing bb/rb)
(lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,731
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,731
The thing with RB is this. Yes it does things somewhat different than most other DAW packages. Some of that is due to the background of it coming from Powertracks. Which to me was a very similar package to what cakewalk was 15 years ago. While PT and RB have not been developed at the same rate as say a sonar or Reaper it is still very potent when utilized properly. Yes it should have the fancy tools the others do. But not one of the other products have the BiaB engine backing up a simple functional DAW.

Sure you can add the BiaB plugin to Reaper or Studio one and generate tracks but then the process moves on. With RB you can generate tracks and listen generate again, select a section and regen until you get what you want. Any section or the whole track or the whole song.

People say that you can’t comp vocal tracks WRONG! You can. You can’t use third party plugins WRONG! You can.

It simple does a very solid job. Yes it needs some refinements however it gets work done! Simply and with a flair. RTs, RD,s, loops, midi, all works great.

If you like the workflow elsewhere great then no worries. If you want to create in BiaB and move to multitrack recording and still have BiaB tools at your fingertips then you can right there in RB just open the .sgu file there and go to work.

Last edited by Rob Helms; 02/16/26 01:06 PM.

HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB/RB 2026, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 11 , Presonus Audiobox USB96
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,731
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,731
I want to add a couple things or maybe clarify a few things. 1. you can do anything in RB that just about any other product can do, it can de-ess, it can compress, it can EQ. It can use 3rd party plugins. 2. Reaper is a very powerful and streamlined, and yet complex DAW. I have had it since version 4. I use it and yet find it a pain to hunt down stuff and a joy to do simple tracking in. I have had Cakewalk/Sonar since the floppy home studio days. Used Sonic Foundries Acid pro versions 2, 3, 4. I have used Studio one versions 2, 3, and 4. Used Multitrackstudios (a powerful robust program.) used Harrison Mixbus and love it. Used Powertracks and RB both powertracks since version 3 RB since inception. I have tracked and mixed well over 150 songs. I have done head-to-head comparisons, i can't tell the difference when done. I have seen the value in each and seen that they are all good in many ways. Same results different roads.

To say that RB would not have a following if it was a separate product is silly. It is not, it is free and it is unique. It is also very capable. I used it exclusively for a while and back then it didn't have a real comping feature that was easy to use. That was the only reason i move to other programs. Now that it has that capability i and using it for almost every project. I do not miss anything the others have. I am able to start from scratch there. or start from BiaB and move over with three clicks. Is it better than Reaper. NO! is it less capable? NO!

It boils down to workflow, and familiarity. Bob is correct!


HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB/RB 2026, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 11 , Presonus Audiobox USB96
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,640
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,640
Rob.

what i'm grappling to understand is why some folks dislike
rb while various people like it ?
maybe it IS familiarity.
i find it such a breeze useing rb with reaper.
and rb complements reaps in sooo many ways...useing advantages of each.
which is why i dont need the bb daw plugin in reaper.
the combo of rb and reaper gives me many more advantages.

so i wonder if more pg rb vids as well as example projects
say with other daws like reaper would help folks realise
there are many benefits of rb with another daw....
ie...rb complementing the other daw.

so where does bb come in ?
what i think bb is good at is say getting a song idea down fast
because of generation speed.
but for heavy lifting then i take the rough song idea
bb project into rb where i'm spoilt for numbers of tracks
and audio/midi features.
i prolly will use bb tracks view once audio/midi features like in
rb tracks view are implemented.

bottom line i would like to see pg put out more info/vids
on use of rb which i'm sure would help new and existing
users not getting frustrated...ie work methods showing laying down a song from start to finish....
(btw...for some reason i cant explain i think the mp3 creator in rb is fab.)

i should mention when i first came to powertracks and then
rb i found the number of features daunting ...there was a learning cycle.
but i kept at it until i had worked out how to use them.
as ive said before to get the best out of rb ya gotta
be willing to go thru a learning cycle and get stuck in.
i really think pg could ameliorate such by vids/much more info.

btw after many years useing both bb and rb (and even reaper) i smack myself that i discovered some feature
thats daw life...lol.

happiness.

om


my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs
(90 songs created useing bb/rb)
(lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,756
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,756
Originally Posted by justanoldmuso
what i'm grappling to understand is why some folks dislike
rb while various people like it ?
om, this is why this user doesn't use rb.

Back in 2022 you personally tried to help me get started with it. We both failed, we both gave up and the tech support here for rb was nearly non-existent.
I then found Studio One, their support was/is great and it's been smooth sailing ever since.
Do you remember this thread?
Could there be a lesson here?
https://www.pgmusic.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Main=95124&Number=702255


https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677
BiaB 2026 Windows
For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,928
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,928
Likely only a handfull of us here who can fully appreciate the significance of this reference going back some 4 years. Certainly the less things change the more they stay the same here in the forum! grin


BIAB – 2026, Reaper (current), i7-12700F Processor, 32GB DDR4-3200MHz RAM, Motu Audio Express 6x6 - My SoundCloud.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,640
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,640
thumper.

i re-read the thread...

sorry you couldnt get rb working with your rig.

many of us rb users are working fine....as rob said he has done a ton of songs with rb as have i and other users.
often it comes down to settings....difficult to help sometimes if the helper
isnt actually there seeing the probs first hand.
as ive said rb needs more supporting vids re useage/set up etc.
rb can be a tad finicky in this aspect.
there are global settings in rb prefs and also track settings.
the other daws prolly go for a default settings set up ??


om

Last edited by justanoldmuso; 02/17/26 02:46 PM.

my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs
(90 songs created useing bb/rb)
(lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,756
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,756
Originally Posted by justanoldmuso
thumper.

i re-read the thread...

sorry you couldnt get rb working with your rig.
No sorries needed, you did your best back in 2022, and I appreciated that, I was brand new back then, still messing around with Audacity.
As for going forward, this rocket has left the launch pad and is powered by Fender Studio Pro.

Fly me away to the bright side of the moon
And meet me on the other side

-- Gary Wright
smile


https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677
BiaB 2026 Windows
For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,640
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,640
Thumper.

re rb and your rig.
heres what i think might be happening.....

heres the scenario..

todays advanced sound interfaces have various input
and output driver selections often for WAS and ASIO.
thus its important to select the right drivers.
basically its a gotcha.
on my interface for example i have various selection options for drivers.
thus its easy to get a prob given the various options if the right driver isnt selected.

heres a suggestion.

you say other music apps work with your rig fine.
sooo...i would like you to go to the user preferences
of each of them and log the driver selections for each whether
WAS or ASIO....THEN...ensure you use the same driver selections
for input and output drivers in RB.
follow up whether still a problem....or if prob solved.
in my interface i have to be carefull re driver selection.
ive seen the above gotcha with various rigs.

i think its got to be a settings issue because too many
of us are running rb just fine....as i said some rb users have done over 80 songs in rb and more.

another thing you might want to try is rent another interface (it only costs a few bucks for a week..dirt cheap...)
and see if the prob goes away.

hth and thats all i got.

om

Last edited by justanoldmuso; 02/18/26 07:31 AM.

my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs
(90 songs created useing bb/rb)
(lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,756
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,756
Originally Posted by justanoldmuso
sooo...i would like you to go to the user preferences
of each of them and log the driver selections for each whether
WAS or ASIO....

om
om, you seem to not understand.
This rocket has left the launch pad and is powered by Fender Studio Pro.


https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677
BiaB 2026 Windows
For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,640
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,640
Thumper.

fyi i'm looking to use FSP due to its range of guitar features..
and its orientation towards guitar players etc....big market of guitar players.
then i'll use rb to generate guitar and bass tracks as well as midi tracks and drop them into FSP and take advantage of FSP's guitar features.

this was a smart move by Fender imho appealing to guitar players...and really ups the
daw ante eg reaper and others.
i'm impressed from what i see so far.

om

Last edited by justanoldmuso; 02/19/26 07:03 AM.

my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs
(90 songs created useing bb/rb)
(lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,756
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,756
Originally Posted by justanoldmuso
Thumper.

fyi i'm looking to use FSP due to its range of guitar features..
and its orientation towards guitar players etc....big market of guitar players.
then i'll use rb to generate guitar and bass tracks as well as midi tracks and drop them into FSP and take advantage of FSP's guitar features.
Good for you man. I've said before, whatever workflow gets the job done efficiently, go for it.
Can we look forward to details and a Showcase example or two?

As for FSP, I just hope the corporate "suits" don't come in and ruin a fantastic DAW.
So far it appears that the dev team has been left alone; let's hope that continues.


https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677
BiaB 2026 Windows
For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,566
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,566
"As for FSP, I just hope the corporate "suits" don't come in and ruin a fantastic DAW."

When has Fender ever done something like that? <grin>

/I kind of expect it anymore


I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,640
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,640
Oh boy..

So is there a possibility that support at some point could be dropped for FSP..

My concern is that in my humble opinion fsp and real band together is a wonderful powerful song creators solution... probably the best I've ever seen in the daw world.... particularly for guitar players.

I love the possibility that guitar tracks generated by real band the sound picture could be changed by the guitar algorithms in fsp... just easily dropping the generated guitar tracks into FS.
Reason being sometimes I don't like the sound picture of a guitar track generated but I like what it's playing.
This I find to be very exciting. Because PG guitar tracks generated can be presented in a song many different ways using FS.

Om

Last edited by justanoldmuso; 02/20/26 06:54 PM.

my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs
(90 songs created useing bb/rb)
(lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,756
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,756
Originally Posted by rharv
"As for FSP, I just hope the corporate "suits" don't come in and ruin a fantastic DAW."

When has Fender ever done something like that? <grin>

/I kind of expect it anymore
Do you have examples where Fender ruined a product?


https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677
BiaB 2026 Windows
For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,614
Veteran
Online Content
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,614
Originally Posted by Bass Thumper
Originally Posted by rharv
"As for FSP, I just hope the corporate "suits" don't come in and ruin a fantastic DAW."

When has Fender ever done something like that? <grin>

/I kind of expect it anymore
Do you have examples where Fender ruined a product?

DAWs no but some guitars yes:

https://guitarriego.com/en-us/guitar/the-failures-of-fender-ugly-guitars-weird-or-not-understood/

BUT Gibson did ruin a fantastic DAW, i.e. Vision. Plus over the years suits have killed a number of good DAWs and other software. Lets hope Fender doesn't follow suit; pun not intended.


Back in my day the only time we started panic buying was when the bartender shouted "last call"!

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,628
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,628
Fender has tried to improve the Stratocaster SO many times. S-1 switching. Lace Sensor pickups. Roller nuts. The list goes on. Thankfully, they keep rolling it back to something close to Leo's original design.

Gibson also stopped developing Cakewalk just after I bought my "lifetime license". BandLab had to rescue them...


DC Ron
BiaB Audiophile
Presonus Studio One
ASUS I9-12900K DAW, 32 GB RAM
Presonus Faderport 16
Too many guitars (is that a thing?)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,566
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,566
Originally Posted by Bass Thumper
Originally Posted by rharv
"As for FSP, I just hope the corporate "suits" don't come in and ruin a fantastic DAW."

When has Fender ever done something like that? <grin>

/I kind of expect it anymore
Do you have examples where Fender ruined a product?

Slapping the Fender/Strat name on cheap imported guitars
G&L
Cortana
Price fixing (2020)
Fender amps with cheap MDF
Fender amps with cheap baffling

How long a list you want?

/ one thing after another

Still, I do own a couple Strats so I'm not 'against' Fender products, not optimistic though, either, when they venture into DAW territory
I remember Gibson/Cakewalk and ya know ..

Last edited by rharv; 02/21/26 07:00 PM.

I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 470
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 470
Originally Posted by rharv
Originally Posted by Bass Thumper
Originally Posted by rharv
"As for FSP, I just hope the corporate "suits" don't come in and ruin a fantastic DAW."

When has Fender ever done something like that? <grin>

/I kind of expect it anymore
Do you have examples where Fender ruined a product?

Slapping the Fender/Strat name on cheap imported guitars
G&L
Cortana
Price fixing (2020)
Fender amps with cheap MDF
Fender amps with cheap baffling

How long a list you want?

/ one thing after another

Still, I do own a couple Strats so I'm not 'against' Fender products, not optimistic though, either, when they venture into DAW territory
I remember Gibson/Cakewalk and ya know ..
There's enough precedent to worry.

Consider GM.
- Installed Chevy engines in Oldsmobiles. Got caught. Killed the brand.
- Installed technically inferior Turbo-Hydramatic 350 transmissions in cars with big displacement engines instead of a spec'd THM400 (an excellent transmission). Got caught.
- On a personal note, undersized the 4-wheel disk brakes on late '80s Buick Gran Sports while still spec'ing them for 30K miles before service. Mine lasted precisely one week beyond the 1 year warranty period. By the time I reached 30K miles, I'd replaced the disks and rotors 3 times at my expense. The issue was well-known to service techs (who whispered it to me), but never made public.

And don't get me started on Stellantis.

Last edited by TheMaartian; 02/21/26 11:56 PM.

ThinkPad i9 32GB RAM 7TB SSD; Win11 Pro; RME Fireface UCX II; BiaB 2026 Ultra
Studio Pro 8; Tonalic Studio 1; Reaper v7; Bitwig Studio 6; Melodyne Studio 5
Gig Performer 5; NI S61 MK3; Focal Shape 65; Beyerdynamic DT 880 & 770
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,566
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,566
I never understood why this was an issue
"- Installed Chevy engines in Oldsmobiles. ."

The Turbo Hydomatic 350 cost me in my GMC conversion van back in the 80-90s .. so that one I get
I found a guy that rebuilt them and kept a few on hand, it was so common.

Nobody needs too get started on Stellantis .. junk

/It's starting to sound like corporations are in it for the $$ <grin>

Last edited by rharv; 02/22/26 06:00 AM.

I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,756
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,756
Originally Posted by DC Ron
Gibson also stopped developing Cakewalk just after I bought my "lifetime license". BandLab had to rescue them...
I read a little about the Cakewalk saga although that didn't affect me personally.
I'm sure the folks at Fender/Presonus are well-acquainted with that story and so I'm optomistic that FSP will continue to grow in the years to come.
But even if it doesn't, the current version does virtually everything I need in a clean, user-friendly and elegant way.

On a side note, I love my Fender Jazz Bass and Bronco 40 practice amp wink


https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677
BiaB 2026 Windows
For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,566
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,566
Yeah, a Jazz bass is on my wishlist
Unfortunately it's gonna be there for a while longer I'm sure.


I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,640
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,640
so...re FSP...

its not exactly cheap.
re the preceeding comments...what are the odds it might be dropped ?
60 per cent ?? more ??
tech markets are littered with orphan products.

it would be interesting to know is presonus going to
be a presence still in the market ?
looks like they will be according to music tech etc.

i really really hope that FSP thrives, because it would be
a great marriage imho with RB. the latter for genning loads of
gtr tracks which are then dropped into FSP for altering the sound character.

heres my prob...
i like gtr tracks that are exciting...but find some RT's bland re
guitar...so i'm always looking for ways to morph
the gtr rt's into excitement via dsp algorithms.

i really wish pg had a way to take dry gtr tracks and morph the
gtr's into 'oh yeah baby' tracks.
guitarists around the world would be flocking to pg's door imho.
sometimes ive been lucky dropping rb genned gtr rt's into reaper
and then dropping in a plugin on the track and mucking with dsp
algos....but...very time consuming...trying to find those 'oh yeah baby gtr sounds.
pg's bass rt's i have no probs with.
just gtr rt's.....gimme more excitement...lol

om

Last edited by justanoldmuso; 02/22/26 04:49 PM.

my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs
(90 songs created useing bb/rb)
(lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,055
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,055
Originally Posted by DC Ron
Fender has tried to improve the Stratocaster SO many times. S-1 switching. Lace Sensor pickups. Roller nuts. The list goes on. Thankfully, they keep rolling it back to something close to Leo's original design.

I actually like the Lace Sensor pickups, I have them in one of my strats. Never cared for the Gold ones, mine has the Red, Silver and Blue set. I'm on a Strat user group over on FB and lots of people still swear by them.
I also like the Fender Noiseless pickups they introduced a few years later, I have them in my '04 strat which is my main guitar.
And I would argue that the five way switch that was introduced in the late 70's is a definite improvement over the original three way switch that Leo chose.

To each his own I guess! wink

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,628
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,628
Originally Posted by BlueAttitude
Originally Posted by DC Ron
Fender has tried to improve the Stratocaster SO many times. S-1 switching. Lace Sensor pickups. Roller nuts. The list goes on. Thankfully, they keep rolling it back to something close to Leo's original design.

I actually like the Lace Sensor pickups, I have them in one of my strats. Never cared for the Gold ones, mine has the Red, Silver and Blue set. I'm on a Strat user group over on FB and lots of people still swear by them.
I also like the Fender Noiseless pickups they introduced a few years later, I have them in my '04 strat which is my main guitar.
And I would argue that the five way switch that was introduced in the late 70's is a definite improvement over the original three way switch that Leo chose.

To each his own I guess! wink

For sure! smile I'll throw the original 7.25" fingerboard radius into the "acquired taste" category, too. Oh, the RWRP middle pickup was another good innovation that stuck. Love positions 2 and 4.

Was referring less to MY tastes in gear than to the innovation reversals over the decades: The market just tends to swing them back to an old school Strat, noisy pickups and all. Go figure...


DC Ron
BiaB Audiophile
Presonus Studio One
ASUS I9-12900K DAW, 32 GB RAM
Presonus Faderport 16
Too many guitars (is that a thing?)
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Holiday Weekend Hours

As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:

April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours

Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!

— Team PG

Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!

If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!

If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!

Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.

PowerTracks Pro 2026 for Windows is Here!

PowerTracks 2026 is here—bringing powerful new enhancements designed to make your production workflow faster, smoother, and more intuitive than ever.

The enhanced Mixer now shows Track Type and Instrument icons for instant track recognition, while a new grid option simplifies editing views. Non-floating windows adopt a modern title bar style, replacing the legacy blue bar.

The Master Volume is now applied at the end of the audio chain for consistent levels and full-signal master effects.

Tablature now includes a “Save bends when saving XML” option for improved compatibility with PG Music tools. Plus, you can instantly match all track heights with a simple Ctrl-release after resizing, and Add2 chords from MGU/SGU files are now fully supported... and more!

Get started today—first-time packages start at just $49.

Already using PowerTracks Pro Audio? Upgrade for as little as $29 and enjoy the latest improvements!

Order now!

Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!

Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!

We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!

Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.

Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.

There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!

Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!

Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.

If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!

Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!

We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!

There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.

When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.

Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.

Forum Statistics
Forums57
Topics86,140
Posts800,794
Members40,043
Most Online64,515
15 hours ago
Newest Members
Tomas Buron, Fasteddy87, Risi, HenryHPH, Baldeagle13
40,043 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 133
DC Ron 103
rsdean 97
WaoBand 71
Noel96 63
Today's Birthdays
bdodge59, felix the cat
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5