Ron: thank you smile I'll have to listen out for the glitches ... they completely passed me by, lol ... see, that's why it's so good to have another, fresh musical ear to listen to our songs! smile

My take with AI is as follows: if you generate the song without any personal input, then that's not your song. But if you've written melody, accompaniment, lyrics, etc., and all the AI does is polish and arrange it, then (to the extent of your personal contribution to the song) that song is yours. There is, I find, a difference between composing and arranging smile .

Besides, it's not like we write every note ourselves, when using BiaB, either ... although BiaB renders what we do write much more faithfully than Suno (the latter has a habit, for good or for bad, of "correcting (what it sees as) one's mistakes" in music theory, etc., when it thinks it has spotted them smile . For me, as someone who likes to experiment with more unusual chord progressions from time to time, that particular habit of Suno's is not fun ... and, as I wrote, BiaB renders exactly what you write, almost all of the time [it does have its moments, too, haha, but far fewer than Suno's!].

At the end of the day, for me, the "end product", i.e. the SONG, is what matters. If I end up with a good song, I'm happy to even forgo my own credits, if needed, so long as my concept of what I wanted is realised. I don't care about "personal glory", haha ... I do care about the end result. And I will never ever publish a song I don't like ... especially not under my own artist name, haha ... regardless of how it's been done. So ... smile

My website