Originally Posted by dcuny
See? Clear and unambiguous.
David, I agree, your attack is in fact, very clear and unambiguous but the problem is that you’re confusing your mis-guided attacks with your personal world views. The subject we are discussing is not your attacks but whether your views on antisemitism are unclear and ambiguous. If someone cannot take a definitive stand and disambiguate whether they agree or disagree with antisemitism, then my analysis stands as-is, until or unless a flaw can be found in it.

It comes as no surprise that you produced zero material from the experts that materially differ from my 5-point analysis. It looks like my analysis is well on its way to becoming time-tested. Who knows, maybe even the experts will use it if they haven’t already derived it themselves. Wouldn’t that be cool? 😊

David, I recommend you guys put your heads together, collaborate privately and produce joint, well-articulated, disambiguated responses. Feel free to hold conference calls to coordinate and facilitate this, because this has not been challenging me in the least, neither intellectually nor morally.

Moreover, in the marketplace of ideas, I hardly think that 2 or 3 against me is a level playing field. Therefore, in the meantime, I’ll be hoping that you can recruit a heavyweight or two that can strengthen your ranks since I find responding to your ambiguity little more than child’s play. In the bargain, maybe he/she can help you disambiguate and clarify your worldview. And don’t forget, I’m still waiting for a thoughtful and convincing rebuttal of my 5-point analysis result . . . if you can produce one.

PS> The heavier the heavy-weight, the better 😊

https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677
BiaB 2026 Windows
For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.