|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 589
Journeyman
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 589 |
Im sure I posted this up but cant find it so I will post it again.The song Im writing has a piano backing and the bass comes in on the 2nd verse.Ive noticed that the piano doesnt sound quite right and it sound as if its "fluttering" slightly.Could it be caused by my tempo change which is a little bit slower than the original style.If it is the cause of the "flutter"what can I do to rectify it.Thanks Frankie
AMD Athlon 7550 dual core processor 2.51 ghz 1 87 gb ram windows 7 Ultimate yamaha rev 500 effects tacam DP-24 DAW Samson Resolv NF monitors Yamaha PSR-620 Keyboard Fender semi accoustic guitar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,950
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,950 |
Quote:
Could it be caused by my tempo change which is a little bit slower than the original style.If it is the cause of the "flutter"what can I do to rectify it.Thanks Frankie
It sure could be just that. This is a RT right? Can you simply adjust tempo to the same as the RT to see if it fixes??
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 589
Journeyman
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 589 |
Hi jazz,Ive tried that and its just a bit to fast for the song.Its not really that noticable maybe Im to picky.Frankie
AMD Athlon 7550 dual core processor 2.51 ghz 1 87 gb ram windows 7 Ultimate yamaha rev 500 effects tacam DP-24 DAW Samson Resolv NF monitors Yamaha PSR-620 Keyboard Fender semi accoustic guitar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,197
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,197 |
Yes, the problem comes from using a slower tempo.
I've noticed that the piano and guitars are especially noticeable when shifted down. To some extent, all the instruments suffer from time shifting, but it seems with the polyphonic instrumuments, it's a bit more pronounced.
I think that's just the nature of the technology. I've heard some programs that can time shift music down pretty impressively, but add pitch shifting to the equation, and all bets are off...
-- David Cuny My virtual singer development blogVocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?BiaB 2025 | Windows 11 | Reaper | Way too many VSTis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 589
Journeyman
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 589 |
Hi dc,I was pretty sure it was to do with tempo but as Ive said to Jazz its not that pronounced its just that if I can hear it then publishers and record A&R people will hear it too.Cheers Frankie
AMD Athlon 7550 dual core processor 2.51 ghz 1 87 gb ram windows 7 Ultimate yamaha rev 500 effects tacam DP-24 DAW Samson Resolv NF monitors Yamaha PSR-620 Keyboard Fender semi accoustic guitar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 928
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 928 |
Yeah, I've noticed R/T change-of-tempo flutter is a hit n' miss kind of thing.
Some tracks seem more "tolerant" to tempo changes than others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,197
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,197 |
One possible solution (depending on the style) is to find a style at about twice the tempo, doubling the rate of chord changes. I think the latest version of BiaB supports this automatically with RealTracks, but I'm currently back a version so I can't verify this. I just do this in BiaB, export the track as a .WAV file, and put it together in Reaper. No doubt RB and PT support the same functionality.
If you're really adventuresome, you could export the file at a tempo where it doesn't give any artifacts, and try using some other software to time shift. Different algorithms might give different results. Audacity has a time shift algorithm, as does Reaper. And even the same algorithm is going to behave differently with different parameters.
If you do go that route, be sure to export your audio using a lossless format, such as .WAV. Unless you've got the "audiophile" version of the RealTracks, you're already introducing some artifacts. The pitch and time shifting that BiaB does is going to introduce some additional artifacts, and exporting to a lossy format like .MP3 is going to make things worse.
I doubt you'll end up with better results than what BiaB gives you, but it might be worth a shot. Now I'll have to give it a try...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,197
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,197 |
I should preface this with the note that I'm running BiaB 2009.5, so things may be different with the 2010.5 version. To test this out, I picked the PopLondon style, which is optimal at 65 BMP. I exported a piano track as a .WAV at 65 BPM, which sounded fine. I also exported a track at 60 BPM, which had noticeable artifacts: warbles, pre-echo - all the sorts of audio nastiness that is associated with time shifting. I imported the two wave files into Audacity, a free audio editor. I selected the 60 BPM track and chose Effect | Change Tempo... to determine the length of the track (101.02 seconds). I then selected the same effect for the second track, changing the its length from 93.25 seconds to 101.02 seconds. The result had many of the same audio "wobbly" pitch artifacts as BiaB. So Audacity was no better than BiaB. Next, I imported the files into Reaper. After stretching the track 65 BMP track to the same length as the 60 BPM track, I tried various pitch shifters. I listened in playback mode, using Good (64 pt Sinc), so the actual results are potentially a bit better than what I heard. The results were varied: - SoundTouch was noticeably bad, with the same artifacts BiaB and Audacity had.
- Dirac LE (slow) was (to my ears) essentially artifact free.
- Low Quality Windowed (fast) had serious phasing issues.
- elastique Pro had a slight warble in spots, and the piano sustain was a bit buzzy, but was very good.
- elastique 2.1 Pro was (again, to my ears) essentially artifact free.
The elatique algorithm has a bazillion parameters to mess with, and I didn't really fiddle with any of them. Shifting from 65 BPM to 60 BMP is quite a lot - 8% - and BiaB 2009.5's version isn't usable. Both Dirac LE and elastique 2.1 Pro produced results that were - to my ears - quite usable. Keep in mind that, the slower the tempo, the more pronounced small timing issues will become. So if you need to create tracks at tempos below those suggested by the RealTracks, exporting the tracks as .WAV files and using another program to do time shifting may provide a viable option. It's certainly one I'll consider, because it's frustrating to have a song just a hair below the suggested tempo, and not be able to use a track. Again, this was a very limited test, and YMMV. Still, it suggests that there might be better alternatives for PG Music to consider.
-- David Cuny My virtual singer development blogVocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?BiaB 2025 | Windows 11 | Reaper | Way too many VSTis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 589
Journeyman
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 589 |
thanks dc for all of your input.Because there isnt a pronounced difference at a slightly slower tempo I think I will stick with it.Its a shame BIAB hasnt got a function to sort this out maybe something for the future.Cheers Frankie
AMD Athlon 7550 dual core processor 2.51 ghz 1 87 gb ram windows 7 Ultimate yamaha rev 500 effects tacam DP-24 DAW Samson Resolv NF monitors Yamaha PSR-620 Keyboard Fender semi accoustic guitar
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,197
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,197 |
I tried a similar test with the Flute, Soloist Bossa Ev 140. I created four .WAV files at different BPM: 140, 120, 100 and 80. I'm rather shocked by what I found. PG Music advertises: Quote:
the superior stretching features in Band-in-a-Box...
But based on my informal testing, I'd be hard pressed to call BiaB's algorithm "superior" to anything else I'd tried. Rather, it seems that it's comparable to the low-end algorithms, and rather inferior to other algorithms.
At 120 BPM, I didn't hear any artifacts from BiaB. At 100 BPM, there was objectionable warbling. 80 BPM was considerably worse.
I performed the time stretching in Audacity. BiaB seems to perform slightly better than Audacity, but not much.
Similarly, the SoundTouch algorithm in Reaper was perhaps a bit worse than BiaB, but neither Dirac LE nor elastique 2.1 Pro exhibited these artifacts.
Don't get me wrong: I love RealTracks, and PG Music offers an excellent product.
I'm just disappointed to find that "superior stretching features" don't appear to appear to be superior to anything other than the low end algorithms out there.
Still, it's very heartening to think that the lower tempo limit for many RealTracks could be be brought even lower, giving even more flexibility to users.
And if I've made a mistake in my methodology, I apologize!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,201
Posts801,897
Members40,066
| |
Most Online64,515 Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|