|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129
Expert
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129 |
Hi all, In a recent post, I mentioned the fact that I'm not very fond of the own sound of my voice - but I do like to sing (what irony !!!) I know vocal effects will never change the problems with the original signal, but I'm wondering if certain vocal effects might make the whole 'band sound' a little better, or in the case of covers - closer to the original recording sound (I realize some people believe in close emulation and others total originality - let's leave that debate alone for now  So if you are a singer out there - or even a guitar player that likes to occasionally sing in the absence of a singer, what advice can you give about the following: 1.) how to methodically work through different vocal effects settings to find what suits your voice, and where to fit it in the 'mix' (references to websites, books also appreciated) 2.) what vocal effects are obviously heard (obvious to those that are familiar with vocal processing, that is) in the classic pop and rock recordings of famous hit songs (any you mention can be looked up quickly on youtube - share your favorite)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,921
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,921 |
If you can sing in tune,* doubling works really well to add depth and texture to an otherwise bland performance. (Doubling is simply the process of recording and re-recording unison parts of a voice or instrument.) If you ever thought your recorded voice felt "thin" in comparison to popular artists, this is probably why.
This can be done as an effect, a la Michael Franks and Thunderbolt Newman (see Youtube for examples), in which the technique is very obvious, or more organically. Countless artists as divergent as Art Garfunkel, Sting, Barbra Streisand, and many, many others record as many as dozens of doubled tracks using little more than the most basic of effects, e.g., compression and reverb. Crosby, Stills & Nash were known for "tripling"--each artist sang on each part--to add to their distinctive sound.
Some artists go much farther and play elaborate tricks with panning and various effects such as delay and pitch shifting, especially in octaves. But I recommend working on the the basic "non-effect" of simple multiple recordings of your voice and playing around with the mix. Try putting your strongest performance front and center, then putting other tracks so far back in the mix that you can just hear them, and go from there. I think you'll pleasantly surprise yourself.
HTH,
Richard
*If you can't, that needs to be dealt with first. It can be easily managed with a neat hack using a MIDI track of the desired part and a harmonizer/pitch shifter.
"My primary musical instrument is the personal computer."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,706
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 9,706 |
Cher: autotune
Tommy James: Tremolo (Crimson & Clover)
Jeff Lynn: ELO telephone voice EQ & Vocoder: Mr Blue Sky
Eric Burton : the animals: Phaseshifter (Sky Pilot)
Peter Frampton: voice box (Do You feel like we do)
Beatles: doubling... when it had to be done manually and without software to fix it.
These are a few examples of using FX on vocals. Doubling and layering is a commonly used practice and is probably evident on just about every artist's singing these days. It is one of the few fx that when done properly is really not evident as an fx but simply adds a fatter, fuller sound to the vox line. Same on the harmonies. If you can hear it clearly, you're probably doing it wrong. Not counting where there are background singing voices, but they are normally harmony, and not unison.
The other FX, I'm not saying you shouldn't use them, however, generally speaking, in most songs, yeah, it's not a good idea to use them.
Go for a clean vocal recording regardless of genre.
In another post here recently I commented a bit on the vocal recording. Often, folks who don't sing well, or think they don't sing well, often try to use fx to cover up and "improve" what they think is a less than good performance. The result is often the exact opposite and draws attention to the vocals rather than people simply getting into the singer's vocal qualities. In reality, most folks who can hold a tune fairly well have a voice that tends to work fairly well with a nice clean recording of their voice in a song.
Neil Young, Tom Waits, and a whole host of other singers are probably not in line for a "singer of the year" award based on their vocal abilities, but since we can hear their vocals clearly, we have come to appreciate their singing for the unique quality that they exhibit in their performances.
There are the occasional songs, which use a new or unique effect quite effectively. But even those folks don't generally repeat it. Frampton, didn't use the voice box on anything else to my recollection. Tommy James left the tremolo to the guitar players after Crimson & Clover.
Unfortunately, Cher used the autotune as did hundreds of others and now, you still hear it even in country music. T-Pain made a career out of it.
As I pointed out in the other post, I too used FX to cover up and disguise the lack of quality in my early vocals. Mostly using excessive reverb. It's incumbent on the home recording enthusiast to learn how to record vocals well. It's not the impossible mission, but it does take time and some experimentation. A good quality mic, a pop screen, a mic stand, and proper technique and some time playing with settings and levels. Sing close in for a warm and intimate sound. I'm generally with in an inch or so even on my condenser mic.
Singing without FX lets you hear what your voice really sounds like. Once you hear it, you can then work on the deficiencies you hear. But if you try to cover it with FX, quite simply, you can't fix what you can't hear clearly.
Another tool: Melodyne. This tool, when used properly and with the correct understanding, can actually give you the tools to become a better singer, and I'm not talking about using it to fix the bad notes. It lets you see what the note looks like and where your vocal inflections are taking that note. There's a really, really good chance that you are not even aware of what you are doing to your singing by means of the vocal inflections. It's the stuff that the vocal coaches hear and train you not to do. I haven't watched AI for the past few seasons but the folks in the final 12 get vocal coaches for each week, and that is what they do to transform the raw talent into polished talent in such a short time. Most people who sing for fun have developed bad habits. Fix those and you improve your skill level by leaps and bounds. But, as I said before, to fix the bad habits, you gotta be able to hear them and recognize them first.
Last edited by Guitarhacker; 06/02/14 05:51 AM.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 459
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 459 |
Joe, at the risk of sounding like a vocal pedagogist, which I am not, I would suggest if you're having problems with your vocals, you should find your modal voice (normal voice found within your vocal register), by trying lower or higher singing keys. Other options would be 'vocal doubling', 'side-chaining' and whole host of effects like reverb, chorus, tremolo, compression, etc., etc., all found in Power Tracks. Good luck!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,705
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,705 |
Joe,
I often tend to simplify things as many times the answer is indeed a simple one. I think this is another case of what Kajun Joe said above, i.e. finding your voice and simply practicing.
And when I say practicing I mean doing full songs, not just voice exercises, and then keeping doing them over and over. I would also suggest you keep recording your attempts and play them back this way you can track your progress.
Vince Gill who I think we will agree is a pretty good singer, once told me that anyone can sing, it just takes finding their key and range, then sing until you develop a style that fits both. But the key is to keep singing. It will not come overnight but you will notice improvements in a direct relationship to the time you put in.
Later,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Other than doubling i wouldnt say that there are many hallmark effects on vocals. I can only think of Phil Collins who seemed to always have what sounds like a short delay on his vox.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New! XPro Styles PAK 7 for Band-in-a-Box 2024 for Mac!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 7 with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 50 RealTracks and RealDrums that are sure to delight!
With XPro Styles PAK 7 you can expect 25 rock & pop, 25 jazz, and 25 country styles, as well as 25 of this year's wildcard genre: Celtic!
Here's a small sampling of what XPro Styles PAK 7 has to offer: energetic rock jigs, New Orleans funk, lilting jazz waltzes, fast Celtic punk, uptempo train beats, gritty grunge, intense jazz rock, groovy EDM, soulful R&B, soft singer-songwriter pop, country blues rock, and many more!
Special Pricing! Until September 30, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 7 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea)! Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box 2024® with XPro Styles PAK 7! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Watch the XPro Styles PAK 7 Overview & Styles Demos video.
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2024 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
New! Xtra Styles PAK 18 for Band-in-a-Box 2024 for Mac!
Xtra Styles PAK 18 for Band-in-a-Box version 2024 is here with 200 brand new styles to take for a spin!
Along with 50 new styles each for the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, we’ve put together a collection of styles using sounds from the SynthMaster plugin!
In this PAK you'll find: dubby reggae grooves, rootsy Americana, LA jazz pop, driving pop rock, mellow electronica, modern jazz fusion, spacey country ballads, Motown shuffles, energetic EDM, and plenty of synth heavy grooves! Xtra Style PAK 18 features these styles and many, many more!
Special Pricing! Until September 30, 2024, all the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 18 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea)! Expand your Band-in-a-Box 2024® library with Xtra Styles PAK 18! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 18 here.
Watch the Xtra Styles PAK 18 Overview & Styles Demos video.
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 18 requires the 2024 UltraPAK/UltraPAK+/Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! Xtra Styles PAK 18 for Band-in-a-Box 2024 for Windows!
Xtra Styles PAK 18 for Band-in-a-Box version 2024 is here with 200 brand new styles to take for a spin!
Along with 50 new styles each for the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, we’ve put together a collection of styles using sounds from the SynthMaster plugin!
In this PAK you'll find: dubby reggae grooves, rootsy Americana, LA jazz pop, driving pop rock, mellow electronica, modern jazz fusion, spacey country ballads, Motown shuffles, energetic EDM, and plenty of synth heavy grooves! Xtra Style PAK 18 features these styles and many, many more!
Special Pricing! Until September 30, 2024, all the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 18 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea)! Expand your Band-in-a-Box 2024® library with Xtra Styles PAK 18! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 18 here.
Watch the Xtra Styles PAK 18 Overview & Styles Demos video.
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 18 requires the 2024 UltraPAK/UltraPAK+/Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 7 for Band-in-a-Box 2024 for Windows!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 7 with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 50 RealTracks and RealDrums that are sure to delight!
With XPro Styles PAK 7 you can expect 25 rock & pop, 25 jazz, and 25 country styles, as well as 25 of this year's wildcard genre: Celtic!
Here's a small sampling of what XPro Styles PAK 7 has to offer: energetic rock jigs, New Orleans funk, lilting jazz waltzes, fast Celtic punk, uptempo train beats, gritty grunge, intense jazz rock, groovy EDM, soulful R&B, soft singer-songwriter pop, country blues rock, and many more!
Special Pricing! Until September 30, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 7 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea)! Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box 2024® with XPro Styles PAK 7! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Watch the XPro Styles PAK 7 Overview & Styles Demos video.
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2024 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Video - Band-in-a-Box® DAW Plugin Version 6 for Mac®: New Features for Reaper
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Mac® - Update Today!
Band-in-a-Box® 2024 for Mac® Video - Over 50 New Features and Enhancements!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums65
Topics82,790
Posts749,368
Members38,889
| |
Most Online2,537
Jan 19th, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean