|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134
Apprentice
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134 |
Tried the Auto Style Wizard a couple of times and now I'd like to get my hands really dirty.
These questions are asked with a basic understanding of the '30' style pattern 'boxes' for melodic instruments and of the use of masks.
1st, is there an ideal number of bars to be copied/ recorded into a cell? For example 1 bar, 2 bars, 4 bars, etc.
2nd, assuming you had 30 cells all set to '5,-i.e., equal probability of being selected, does the length of the initial chorus effect the probabiity of more cells being chosen ... or is that what the 'no duplicates till 8' do, that is change how the parts are selected.
Any link or reference to past posts or are welcome.
Thanks in advance.
Prado
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
I find the "reverse engineering" method to be quite helpful.
Just open existing styles with the Style Editor and examine them, see what's been done.
This answered that, "how many bars" question for me, with examples of when and where.
And a lot of other questions, too, some of which I did not know to ask.
Give it a try.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134 |
Thanks Mac ...
Will do.
I'd still like any info on the probability aspects of how the generation/ select algorithm works. For example, is there a point of diminishing returns as far as how many cells you program. I can see that the number of cells might be understandably different for the different instruments ... as in less bass lines and more piano lines, for example.
Prado
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603 |
Hello, Prado.
We don't know for sure if a number of 6 gives the pattern exactly 3 times the likelihood of being chosen over one with a number of 2; but that would be the way to bet, and the assumption is close enough in practice. By the time you have 20 or 40 patterns, the massed probabilities become too much to think about anyway. Diminishing returns set in after maybe 7 or 8 patterns on a line -- far fewer than that in simple strict styles. If you dispute my number after a little experience, just add some patterns for greater variety.
If you have a pattern you don't want to hear very often, just give it a 1 or 2. Another that is more generic and more widely useful could get a 7 or 8. Most can ride along at 5. (If you make them all 8's, that has the same effect as making them all 1's.) Mostly, you should just stop worrying about the mathematical details.
In a long chorus -- with more opportunities for a pattern to get used -- naturally there's a higher chance for it to be played than if you had only a couple bars.
Are you paying attention to the "masks" of the patterns yet? With those, you can reserve a pattern for specific circs, like a turnaround or fill measure. Putting masks on patterns sets them aside for special use, so they aren't even considered for other places in the song.
PG jazz styles tend to use patterns masked for all their measures: This one for bar1, that for bar2, right on through the 8-bar cycle. You may not want to go that far, but if you do it so, you can get a tight and highly-controlled sounding style that runs no risk of repeating the same pattern for two chords in a row. I leave them sloppy and loose, myself, for the ballad styles I often write -- with no bar masking of that strict type. Whatever you like is fair use.
Larry
______
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603 |
Quote:
1st, is there an ideal number of bars to be copied/ recorded into a cell? For example 1 bar, 2 bars, 4 bars, etc.
You may not be entirely clear on how it works, or maybe I'm misunderstanding you.
Have you noticed that a style section's main 4 lines are reserved for 8-beat, 4-beat, 2-beat, and 1-beat patterns? That sets the MINIMUM amount of info you need in each pattern on that line. There is usually little point in exceeding that, but you can bang in longer phrases than the minimum, if you like. The program will ignore the extra beats, and if all goes well, it may sound OK anyway.
Don't use fewer beats; that will cause the Awkward Silence of Doom and give you the pip.
Larry
______
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134 |
@Allis ... Thanks for your help. Yes I do understand about 'masks.'
And, obviously if I'd listened more carefully to Mac I would have looked more closely in the style maker and known that we're talking 2, 1 and 1/2 bars!
I think I now have enough of the basic idea to just play around with it to get a better feel for what happens.
I was thinking about the probabilites as '5' being neutral, i.e., an equal chance of being selected as any other '5' ... so if you had 5 cells of '5' each selectioni each cell would have a 20% chance of being slected ... where as other cells excluding 1 and 9 would have a slightly higher or lower chance of selection. For example (according to my idle speculation!) if you had 4 cells of '5' and one of '6' the '5s' might have a 18% chance and the '6' a 28% chance ... to be modified if there were 3 '5s' and 2 '6s' in some fashion to something like 16% for '5s' and 26% for '6s.'
However, I don't think this is true 'random selection,' otherwise the 'no duplicates till ... ' function would be useless. Probabilities must be affected by prior selection.
You might imagine ... yes I am fascinated by probability theory and statistics.
Thanks ...
Prado
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603 |
Sounds like you're on your way. Mac surely was right about studying PG Music styles for a bit. You can start to see how a good style, known to be successful in widespread use, is assembled. Try customizing the snot out of them, too. Very quickly, you have a library of stuff with your own subtly different touch.
Stay in touch.
Larry
______
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603 |
Quote:
I was thinking about the probabilites as '5' being neutral, i.e., an equal chance of being selected as any other '5' ... so if you had 5 cells of '5' each selectioni each cell would have a 20% chance of being slected ... where as other cells excluding 1 and 9 would have a slightly higher or lower chance of selection. For example (according to my idle speculation!) if you had 4 cells of '5' and one of '6' the '5s' might have a 18% chance and the '6' a 28% chance ... to be modified if there were 3 '5s' and 2 '6s' in some fashion to something like 16% for '5s' and 26% for '6s.'
That's absolutely how she works.
But you seem to be implying one small thing that's wrong: The value of 1 has no absolute significance, the way 9 does. "1" just means "Really really, low; almost never play this".
Last edited by allis; 02/09/10 05:31 PM.
Larry
______
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134 |
re '1' ... I stand, sit and bow corrected! And of course, to have an absolute value of 'never play' would be a conundrum ... unless it was 'masked?'
Prado
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134 |
... not sure if I should start a new thread ... but two more stylemaker questions.
First, when working in the Stylemaker is there a simple way to 'solo' the cell you are auditioning without going to the main menu and soloing the instruments there?
Second, when auditioning a cell, for example the 1st cell in Part A 8 beat, it always seems to play exactly the same accompaniement by other instruments. This makes me wonder whether the cell order is linked between instruments. That is all instruments are playing cell one in Part A 8 Beat. Anyone know?
If it were so, it suggests a lot of great tweaks to existing styles for adding cells in which you slightly change some of the notes for just one instrument and leave the others alone.
I also think I see the answer to my 'call and response' melody question: use 8 beats and link the first 4 beats on one instrument , leaving the rest blank, with the inverse on a second compatible instrument ... or maybe 'empty' bars? I've got to check and see if I can put a probability on an empty bar.
Prado
Last edited by Prado; 02/09/10 06:02 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
"Weighting"
The numbers indicate the weight value statistically.
In other words, a 9 is statistically weighted to be selected more often than a 4.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603 |
It's weighting with a twist, though: 9 is a special value in the Stylemaker. A pattern with a weight of 9 plays EVERY SINGLE TIME a chance arises.
If you have a pattern with a mask for "bar 4 of 4" and a weighting value of 9, it will play on every single bar-4 that ever comes by while that style section is active. So you can escape the weighting that way.
Larry
______
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603 |
Quote:
First, when working in the Stylemaker is there a simple way to 'solo' the cell you are auditioning without going to the main menu and soloing the instruments there?
Sure. Highight the pattern and hit the space bar.
Quote:
Second, when auditioning a cell, for example the 1st cell in Part A 8 beat, it always seems to play exactly the same accompaniement by other instruments. This makes me wonder whether the cell order is linked between instruments. That is all instruments are playing cell one in Part A 8 Beat. Anyone know?
Good ear, hearing that linking. Auditioning in the Stylemaker does link together patterns in comparable rows of the different instruments. During real playback, that link is broken. In the ENDINGs, however, the link seems to be observed both during playback and audition. You can use the tricks you suggest, to make nice endings.
Quote:
...I've got to check and see if I can put a probability on an empty bar.
Absolutely can. If your genre allows it and won't sound weird, you may lay instruments out at random, using all the blank patterns you can stand.
Last edited by allis; 02/09/10 06:49 PM.
Larry
______
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603 |
Quote:
And of course, to have an absolute value of 'never play' would be a conundrum ...
It would be a little pointless, as a general thing, yes. But two related things come to mind.
If you apply a weighting of "0" to a pattern, it will erase itself and be gone forever.
If you want to shut up a particular pattern without losing it forever, you can "Mute" it. An M appears as its weighting, and it never plays until you unmute it again. Occasionally useful, nice for the insecure user afraid to erase anything.
Larry
______
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134 |
Great stuff ... thanks Allis and Mac.
Prado
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603 |
Good luck! You will get a good result because you're really interested in doing this and not afraid to try it. BiaB will quickly get even better for you. The styles are the core of the program, and you won't be stuck using only what you're lucky enough to find. Available Stylemaker Tutorials I should have mentioned before: Stylemaker Tutorial 1 Stylemaker Tutorial 2____________
Larry
______
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2025!
We’ve expanded the Band-in-a-Box® RealTracks library with 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 449-467) across Jazz, Blues, Funk, World, Pop, Rock, Country, Americana, and Praise & Worship—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Blues & World (Sets 449–455):
These RealTracks includes “Soul Jazz” with Neil Swainson (bass), Mike Clark (drums), Charles Treadway (organ), Miles Black (piano), and Brent Mason (guitar). Enjoy “Requested ’60s” jazz, classic acoustic blues with Colin Linden, and more of our popular 2-handed piano soloing. Plus, a RealTracks first—Tango with bandoneon, recorded in Argentina!
Rock & Pop (Sets 456–461):
This collection includes Disco, slap bass ‘70s/‘80s pop, modern and ‘80s metal with Andy Wood, and a unique “Songwriter Potpourri” featuring Chinese folk instruments, piano, banjo, and more. You’ll also find a muted electric guitar style (a RealTracks first!) and “Producer Layered Guitar” styles for slick "produced" sound.
Country, Americana & Praise (Sets 462–467):
We’ve added new RealTracks across bro country, Americana, praise & worship, vintage country, and songwriter piano. Highlights include Brent Mason (electric guitar), Eddie Bayers (drums), Doug Jernigan (pedal steel), John Jarvis (piano), Glen Duncan (banjo, mandolin & fiddle), Mike Harrison (electric bass) and more—offering everything from modern sounds to heartfelt Americana styles
Check out all the 202 New RealTracks (in sets 456-467)
And, if you are looking for more, the 2025 49-PAK (for $49) includes an additional 20 RealTracks with exciting new sounds and genre-spanning styles. Enjoy RealTracks firsts like Chinese instruments (guzheng & dizi), the bandoneon in an authentic Argentine tango trio, and the classic “tic-tac” baritone guitar for vintage country.
You’ll also get slick ’80s metal guitar from Andy Wood, modern metal with guitarist Nico Santora, bass player Nick Schendzielos, and drummer Aaron Stechauner, more praise & worship, indie-folk, modern/bro country with Brent Mason, and “Songwriter Americana” with Johnny Hiland.
Plus, enjoy user-requested styles like Soul Jazz RealDrums, fast Celtic Strathspey guitar, and Chill Hop piano & drums!
The 2025 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2025 49-PAK!
Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac!
With your version 2025 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Or upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 33 new RealTracks and 65+ new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 29 new RealTracks and 45+ new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 20 new RealStyles.
- Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana
- Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano
- Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7
- Playable RealTracks Set 4
- RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark
- SynthMaster Sounds and Styles (with audio demos)
- 128 GM MIDI Patch Audio Demos.
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyles,
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster,
- Instrumental Studies Set 23: More '80s Hard Rock Soloing,
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster
- Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8
- RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®!
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Mac!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Mac!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 9 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Windows!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Windows!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 9 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins
Join the conversation on our forum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,394
Posts778,637
Members39,646
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean