|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,174
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,174 |
BIAB – 2025, Reaper (current), i7-12700F Processor, 32GB DDR4-3200MHz RAM, 1TB WD Black NVMe SSD, 2TB WDC Blue SSD, 1TB WD Blue, 2 TB SK NVMe, 6 TB External, Motu Audio Express 6x6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 812
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 812 |
Hi,
I tried Reaper, I didn't like it at all. I found it very confusing to use. I still think it's a tossup on the PC between Sonar and Pro Tools. I used Cubase for years, but I think the both the forementioned programs are easier to use.
Now, on the Mac side, Logic RULES! The best DAW out now. And way ahead of either Sonar or
In the end, I guess it's a matter of what works best for YOU.
Ed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 973
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 973 |
Hi All
I also tried Reaper and found it difficult to get into,I wonder just
how many so called High End users there are?
Agreed that it's a toss-up between Pro Tools and Sonar,so difficult to choose,I use both though
I must confess that I like Pro Tools over Sonar.
I used to use Logic before it became Mac only,and if I could afford a Mac,Logic would be
my preferred DAW,no question.
That's All
Alan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,426
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,426 |
The reason for Reaper's relative popularity is a bit obvious; it costs a fraction of the others' at $60. If you're starting out on the home recording journey and budget is an issue (and also as a newbie you may be unsure as to whether the hobby is for you) then it's a no-brainer, Reaper is the one. I tried it a while ago out of curiosity but found it difficult to deal with, which is borne out by a recent Sound On Sound review which concluded it was an excellent product but demanded a lot of user pre-configuration:- "Users of other sequencers will usually need some time to adjust to the Reaper mind-set. You need to invest some time in making the many user-configurable settings if you’re going to get the best out of it." It puts a much steeper initial learning curve in front of you, especially if you're coming from another product, but with ample rewards afterwards. SOS Review John
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Wouldn't exactly call the software that won by a vote a secret...
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,992
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,992 |
ive tried most daws.
i use powertraks and reap.
i even use pg's nice dx fx plug ins in reap.
for me reap was a breeze to set up..
i was recording in 5 minutes.
dunno why folks say its complex.
as soon as i get some medical billls outta the way my next step
is loads of pg realtraks//rb etc etc.
i'll never go PT.
version 8 is nice , but i wanna stay free of dongles.
to be honest you can do a great song in any daw these days.
includeing just useing powertraks.
retired puter engr....powertracks on amd......NICE !
"what is the black art of audio engineering ?"
my silly songs...motagator.com/bmanning
see my tips in the tips section.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
John, Quote:
The reason for Reaper's relative popularity is a bit obvious; it costs a fraction of the others' at $60.
Very true. Sonar cost me a pretty sizeable chunk of change. But it's good.
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,075
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,075 |
Quote:
The reason for Reaper's relative popularity is a bit obvious; it costs a fraction of the others' at $60.
I'm sure a lot of people will switch from other DAW software when the price to feature ratio gets so skewed that it's crazy to pay more for the same features.
Since I'm at version 6 Sonar, my next upgrade is already 3-4 times the entry level purchase price of Reaper. Before I upgrade Sonar again, I will definitely install Reaper and give it a go. I'd be foolish NOT to!
However, RB is already so close to offering all the features I currently depend on Sonar to provide, that I am hoping that the next few upgrades fulfil my wish list items so I can drop Sonar completely and do ALL of my recording with PGMusic products.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 235
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 235 |
Quote:
The reason for Reaper's relative popularity is a bit obvious; it costs a fraction of the others' at $60.
John
Most users have come from Sonar, Cubase, PT, Saw.....
They were looking for a better program. They found it.
The majority have stayed.
I wouldn't recommend it to anyone unwilling to read the manual. Most experienced Photoshop users would have never got there without the Photoshop Bible.
Reaper is a dream to track in and a great mixing environment. Probably the biggest hurdle is in understanding how to use Routing.
I think I read somewhere that some of the Realtracks were recorded via Reaper.......hmmmm.....
All these programs have their place from the light weight apps to the more advanced. Use what you like... there is no best app...only best app for you or me!
DTuna
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,417
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,417 |
Reaper users almost border on the fanatic side. The reason being they can get a powerful DAW for "free" yep you only pay if you want the nag screen to go away. Don't kid yourself many never pay.
That aside it is a very powerful app, and the routing options are limitless. There has been side by side comparisons done with Both Cubase and Sonar. Both of which had the better feature set when closely compared to Reaper. But for the "price" even when paid for Reaper has a lot going for it.
My complaint is that it is confusing and every time i tracked with it it crashed on me. I had issues with midi files in it. Not a bad deal but more difficult than an app that has the routing more defined.
Once in a while folks around here mention Mutitrackstudio. i prefer it. Many shy away cause it seems simple, but that is the beauty it is simple, but very powerful and best of all solid as a rock. I find MTS to have many rich and easy to use features. The audio editing is very good, and you can track in minutes from the easy setup. On the midi side it is solid and has a prefect routing setup any midi track is treated like an audio track once it leaves the track and goes thru the synth. which is a click and add feature.I still have Reaper on my system, but i use RB and MTS for almost everything. These apps get 'er done.
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini with 16 gig of ram, BiaB 2025, Realband, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 9 32c , Melodyne 5 editor, Presonus Audiobox 1818VSL, Presonus control app.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holiday Weekend Hours
Our Customer Service hours this weekend are as follows:
Friday, April 18: 8:00 - 4:00
Saturday, April 19: closed
Sunday, April 20: closed
Monday, April 21: Regular hours
Thank you!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!
Bonjour à tous,
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music
Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:
BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation
Voilà, enjoy!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!
Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!
Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
Stay up to date—get the latest update now!
Update to RealBand® 2025 Build 5 Windows Today!
Already using RealBand® 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 5 now from our Support Page to ensure you have the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
Get the latest update today!
PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 for Windows is Here!
PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 is here! This new version introduces many features, including VST3 support, the ability to load or import a .FLAC file, a reset option for track height in the Tracks window, a taller Timeline on the Notation window toolbar, new freeze buttons in the Tracks window, three toolbar modes (two rows, single row, and none), the improved Select Patch dialog with text-based search and numeric patch display, a new button in the DirectX/VST window to copy an effects group, and more!
First-time packages start at only $49. Already a PowerTracks Pro Audio user? Upgrade for as little as $29!
www.pgmusic.com/powertracks.htm
Video: Summary of the New Band-in-a-Box® App for iOS®
Join Tobin as he takes you on a tour of the new Band-in-a-Box® app for iOS®! Designed for musicians, singer-songwriters, and educators, this powerful tool lets you create, play, and transfer songs effortlessly on your iPhone® or iPad®—anytime, anywhere.
Band-in-a-Box® for iOS® :Summary video.
Check out the forum post for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics83,895
Posts771,896
Members39,481
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean