|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 36
Enthusiast
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 36 |
I am currently using a Ketron SD2 sound module with BIAB. Sounds OK for piano, drums, bass, not so good for brass & woodwinds. Any recommendations for something better that doesn't cost a bundle? Less than $1K?
Thanks,
MB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,199
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,199 |
Everything that I've heard from the SD2 points to having some of the best brass and woodwinds sounds in a synth. I would call them comparable to my Korg PA800.
You're not going to find anything less than $1,000 that's going to match those sounds.
Gary
I'm blessed watching God do what He does best. I've had a few rough years, and I'm still not back to where I want to be, but I'm on the way and things are looking far better now than what they were!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
You are likely only using the GM bank on the Ketron.
The Upper Bank patches are where the horns are at, try substituting some of those.
For example, the Golden Trumpet patch easily outshines the standard GM Trumpet patch sound, etc.
Patchmaps for the SD2 are available for download on the PGMusic Support pages, one for BiaB and another for PT/RB. This makes selecting and auditioning the patches a breeze as it lists them by name and grouped by instruments.
BIG difference in the sound and realism once you get the hang of it.
GM - General MIDI - is just the standardized sound bank that allows many different users to play back MIDI files and at least hear the same basic instruments as the creator of the file wanted. Without it, there would be no Patch number standardization and one person's synth might decide that what was a Saxophone could be anything else. Upper Banks are not standardized so you would have to pick and choose for each different hardware or software synth out there.
It is worth the little bit of extra time to do so. As with anything MIDI, there will be a small learning curve to this, but once past that point it should become second nature to assign Upper Banks in order to get better sounds.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021 |
Curiosity.
I certainly understand the GM concept. What I don't understand is why would Ketron and others put cheesy sounds in the GM slots?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
I don't understand why you would associate "cheezy" with it.
Nobody has said that, to my knowledge.
There are just better sounds to be had in the Upper Banks of the SD2 for some of the instruments.
Since the subject here deals with horns, let's examine that aspect.
There are horns in the upper banks that feature Vibrato, something that is likely undesirable to have in the GM bank where it is not known what kind of music someone may wish to play back.
There are the "breathy" saxophones as well.
And Trumpets that feature different tones from warm to bright, some of which have a bit of Vibrato in them, as well. Again, that kind of thing does not translate well when the genre and type of music to be played back is not known.
So GM banks are typically made with instrument sounds that are more on the "generic" side so that there can be cross-compatability with all sorts of possible genres.
Think of it like the Leatherman Tool or the older Swiss Army knife analogy. I love my Leatherman Wave and go nowhere without it. Excellent compact tool for emergencies, even various everyday tasks.
Then again, I wouldn't want to try doing a valve job with it...
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,607
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,607 |
They try to create a matched set. A General soundset that will work for most stuff. A trumpet with a bunch of vibrato and lip slurs, bends etc may sound fantastic for a trumpet solo, but put a bunch of them together and you do not end up with a nice trumpet section. You need the blander sounds to mix together without clashing. A usable set.
That was one of the cool things with fonts- you could roll yer own.
GM sounds are not always cheesey, but often not the best for a particular use. They are the 'general' (generic) version.
*edit*
*guess I was typing while Mac was. At least we seem to agree basicly!
Last edited by rharv; 08/07/10 05:39 AM.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 463
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 463 |
I've downloaded both free and professional midis with some unbelievable horn sections.
My Roland SC-88 sounds great and I can only imagine what the Ketron would sound like.
If you look at the events list of the tracks, there are numerous midi controllers applied to just one note to achieve a very realistic sound. No idea how they do it.
Percy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,607
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,607 |
Being familiar with each horn's sound and capabilities, and knowing how to use the available MIDI tools (controllers) does help a ton with the facade. The samples can only take you so far on their own. Replicating a live musician on their preferred insrument is a big challenge. They use tons of nuances that may not get noticed at first.
Example - Sanborn often slides up to notes slightly, and his tone is very recognizable. Expecting a generic sax sample to replicate that is not realistic. BTW I have a sample set of his sound. Just getting that nasally tone alone makes it seem more more real for his style, but a ton of controllers are indeed needed to finish it off..
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 36
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 36 |
Thanks for the suggestions. I will experiment more with voice banks of the SD2. I think it's OK for what I mostly use it for - practicing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 36
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 36 |
I installed the patch map and in certain instances, there are better sounding instruments to choose from. You need to choose the best patch for each specific application which is OK.
Thanks.
MB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
TIP:
When there is a horn *section* in your MIDI tracks, Trumpet, Sax or Bone, try invoking a *different* virtual player for each "member" of the section.
For example, Placing that Golden Trumpet on the lead, the generic GM Trumpet on the "second chair" - perhaps the bright trumpet on the third chair, etc. can go a long way towards sounding more like separate characters in a section without resorting to the entry of all those CC's and the like.
The above is one place where the SD2 really shines.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 262
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 262 |
Mac & Gary have it right!
The Ketron SD2 is just about the best for lots of sounds (orchestral and jazz/pop).
It has the only decent Breathy Tenor Sax
Best jazz Clarinet in the upper range
Best Violin and Viola
Best Trumpet (Golden Trumpet)
Excellent Flute
When I say best I mean of all of the many hardware synths I have ever played or listened to whenever solo samples were available on websites, over the last 15 years.
Furthermore I am talking about playing brass and wind on a wind controller live which has more demands than if you play with a keyboard or play back from notation program with keyswitching.
Although the Garritan libraries sound great when painstakingly written out and tweaked note by note -they are often disappointing when you try to play them live on a wind controller.
Now if you want the absolute best Trumpet and Trombone sounds - there is nothing as good as the sounds from samplemodeling.com. It leaves everything in the dust as far as authenticity of sound, responsiveness and playability on a wind controller.
It's obviously great when played with a keyboard.
I have not had a chance to really test Wallander sounds which a number of people have said is very good.
In summary, for a hardware synth, especially one at such a bargain price there is nothing that compares to the Ketron SD2 as far as acoustic sounds are concerned.
On a number of the newer Roland synths including the SC-88 etc. I do like the Kawal patch quite a bit and sadly there is nothing quite like it on the SD2.Mac has it right.
The Ketron SD2 is just about the best for lots of sounds.
It has the only decent Breathy Tenor Sax
Best jazz Clarinet in the upper range
Best Violin and Viola
Best Trumpet (Golden Trumpet)
Excellent Flute
When I say best I mean of all of the many hardware synths I have ever played or listened to whenever solo samples were available on websites.
Furthermore I am talking about playing brass and wind on a wind controller live which has more demands than if you play with a keyboard or play back from notation program with keyswitching.
Although the Garritan libraries sound great when painstakingly written out and tweaked note by note -they are often disappointing when you try to play them live on a wind controller.
Now if you want the absolute best Trumpet and Trombone sounds - there is nothing as good as the sounds from samplemodeling.com. It leaves everything in the dust as far as authenticity of sound, responsiveness and playability on a wind controller.
It's obviously great when played with a keyboard.
I have not had a chance to really test Wallander sounds which a number of people have said is very good.
In summary, for a hardware synth, especially one at such a bargain price there is nothing that compares to the Ketron SD2 as far as acoustic sounds are concerned.
On a number of the newer Roland synths including the SC-88 etc. I do like the Kawal patch quite a bit and sadly there is nothing quite like it on the SD2.v
Last edited by Dan Tong; 08/07/10 09:17 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 36
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 36 |
re - TIP:
"When there is a horn *section* in your MIDI tracks, Trumpet, Sax or Bone, try invoking a *different* virtual player for each "member" of the section.
For example, Placing that Golden Trumpet on the lead, the generic GM Trumpet on the "second chair" - perhaps the bright trumpet on the third chair, etc. can go a long way towards sounding more like separate characters in a section without resorting to the entry of all those CC's and the like.
The above is one place where the SD2 really shines. "
Q - So if I have a brass rythym section in a song, I need to have a separate midi track for each member if I want to mix and match different types of trumpets etc.? Most of everything I have done so far has just been BIAB stuff, mostly backing tracks. Any way to get a good sounding brass section in there without midi tracks? Or do I need to use a combo of midi & BIAB? It would be nice to have some Ketron presets to choose from that mixed & matched trumpets etc.
Thanks,
MB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Well, even in BiaB, if you are hearing different Patches from the "horn section" - then they are on different MIDI channels.
Changing the Patch on each MIDI channel then is easy.
There aren't any presets for that inside the SD2, this should be done by the host software.
Are you using MIDI files? If so, in BiaB, you can change the Patch for each instrument by hitting the big round green SEQ button. Should be self-explanatory from there.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 36
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 36 |
I have not been using midi files but it looks like they will give me more flexibility. I've been trying to avoid the extra complexity and learning curve but I guess there's no free lunch.
Thanks,
MB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 36
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 36 |
BTW - I have been using an old version of BIAB and just upgraded to the latest verion that includes RB. I'm hoping that will make the inclusion and manipulation of midi files a little easier with BIAB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Quote:
I have not been using midi files but it looks like they will give me more flexibility. I've been trying to avoid the extra complexity and learning curve but I guess there's no free lunch.
Thanks,
MB
Even so, if you hear different horns then they have to be being sent on different MIDI channels and changing them would be much the same. If using the BB MIDI harmonizer, then you may have to resort to some Event List edits or the like, though. Once you get the thing down, though, you can create a Custom Harmony file or two that already has those patches embedded, and just choose the custom harmony you want to get the upper banks instruments playing.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 36
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 36 |
I have not spent any time with the harmonizer. That will be next on my list. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
So what track or tracks in BB is your horn section on?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 36
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 36 |
I have been simply selecting brass patches in place of strings or piano for selected styles where it will work. But you don't have control over the individual brass patches. Not the greatest but it's fast an easy. RB will probably give me more options and I will revisit downloading midi tracks and use the extended patches of the Ketron. I think the extra effort will be worth it once I'm past the initial learning curve. I have watched a couple of YouTube videos on RB and I should have the s/w upgrade soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,206
Posts801,939
Members40,069
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean