|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 17
Enthusiast
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 17 |
Hi everyone, I’m a new user to PG Music and I’m very excited about it, but there’s so much to learn! I’m struggling to decide if I should use BiaB or RB and I’m hoping someone can give me some help in that respect.
I use Cubase as my DAW and I write songs for my own pleasure only, not for commercial gain or anything like that. I’m a reasonable rhythm guitarist but that’s about it. I can write a song using my guitar but always struggle with the accompaniment, which is where I’m hoping PG Music comes in!
So if I can write my own chords and melody, what does BiaB give me that RB doesn’t? The only thing I think I’ve found so far is the melodist but I don’t think I need that. RB seems much more flexible and I envisage getting some chords down and generating some RealTracks and MIDI and then moving it all into Cubase.
Is this the right approach or am I missing something spectacular that BiaB can do that RB can’t?
I’ve posted this in the BiaB forum as it seems to be the most popular one, which again is telling me I’m missing something! I’m interested to hear what all you other people do regarding your workflow and the two programs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
The answer, at least MY answer, is, "BOTH".
I like the flexibility that BiaB provides when first building a song, but at some point the thing may get transferred over to RB for adding audio tracks (BB only has the one audio track), effects, that sort of thing.
Look, it takes a bit of time to learn how to use the programs, the only good thing I can tell you about that is to get started. For one thing, simply loading and playing the PGMusic provided Demo Songs, watching what happens as they play back, hearing what happens when you see certain Bar Settings in a song, that sort of thing, can really help you to get an idea of the way things are done.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,686
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,686 |
I will respectfully disagree with Mac IF you are really proficient with Cubase. Why learn a new DAW if you are happy with the one you have? However if you are not proficient or happy with Cubase then dump it and learn RB.
I start the majority of my songs BiaB then using the DAW Plugin mode transfer everything (midi, midi converted to wavs and RealTracks) to Sonar and finish my songs there. You would do the same except to change Sonar to Cubase.
I hope this helps.
Tips on how to fall asleep in a living room chair:
1- Be old
2- Sit in a chair
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 349
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 349 |
Hi Pete Welcome to the forum I always like to direct new users in your situation to: http://www.pgmusic.com/videos.user.htmand then to watch the video set there titled: Song From Start to Finish - BIAB, RealBand, & Reaper Author: Dan (aka Shockwave199) It's a good example of using BIAB to rough out a song, then Real Band to add Realtracks to "flesh it out" and then transfer it to Reaper (or in your case Cubase) for final tweaking. Have fun learning both BIAB and Realband and realize that the people in this forum are a wealth of knowledge and eager to help newbies with any questions or problems you may encounter. Have a good one, Carkins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 17
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 17 |
Thanks for this guys, it’s a great help.
I’ll check out the demo songs, that’s a great idea. I’m not thinking of using RB instead of Cubase, more as well as Cubase. An interim step I think as it can certainly do things that Cubase can’t, like generating RealTracks, MultiRiffs, etc.
Mario, I wonder why you go straight from BiaB to Sonar? What do you do in BiaB that you can’t do in RB? Have you thought (for example) of going to RB and generating an additional track for just a few bars?
Thanks for the video link, I’ll check it out this evening.
I’m still interested to know what BiaB can do that RB can’t (other than melodist and soloist) and why most people seem to prefer BiaB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,686
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,686 |
Quote:
Mario, I wonder why you go straight from BiaB to Sonar? What do you do in BiaB that you can’t do in RB? Have you thought (for example) of going to RB and generating an additional track for just a few bars?
Hi Pete, I have been using BiaB for a few years now but I’ve been using Cakewalk’s DAWS for a very long time. Thus I can work in Sonar a lot faster than I can in RB. This is not a knock against RB, it seems to be a very good DAW however I know already know Sonar. The one thing that RB can do that Sonar can’t is to generate backing tracks but that is what I use BiaB for plus Sonar can do a couple of things that RB can’t. So I use Sonar because I am very familiar with it.
Like I said I have used Biab for a number of years now. I generate backing tracks in BiaB but most of the time I modify, sometimes very heavily, the results BiaB gives me. I do all that work is Sonar for reasons already stated. I use BiaB as a sketch board using mostly midi but RealTracks at times and Sonar to polish and finish things off. That includes adding a few bars, additional tracks, deleting a few bars and/or tracks, blending two or three different BiaB styles, etc.
This is the workflow that works best for me. Many other forum members use just BiaB and RB. Some work like me, BiaB to a DAW of their choice. Others use RB to another DAW or BiaB, RB, to another DAW. The path you take should be the one that works best for you. There are no “rules in stone” on this.
If you have any questions feel free to ask.
Tips on how to fall asleep in a living room chair:
1- Be old
2- Sit in a chair
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,610
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,610 |
Same workflow as Mario's... BIAB - > Sonar. It's just what I'm used to. I don't have the patience to learn another DAW. LOL!!!
Cheers,
Mike
Cheers, Mike My Music * Asus ROG Strix G15CF 32 GB DDR4 4TB HDD + 1 TB SSD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8GB Win 11 AKAI EIE PRO Sound Interface. BIAB/RB 2024 UltraPak Build - Latest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 196
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 196 |
Quote:
I will respectfully disagree with Mac IF you are really proficient with Cubase. Why learn a new DAW if you are happy with the one you have? However if you are not proficient or happy with Cubase then dump it and learn RB.
I start the majority of my songs BiaB then using the DAW Plugin mode transfer everything (midi, midi converted to wavs and RealTracks) to Sonar and finish my songs there. You would do the same except to change Sonar to Cubase.
I hope this helps.
+1
plus I use high quality 64 bit VST Sample libraries Strings, Woodwinds, Brass, choirs, in Sonar (e.g. East West - oops I’m not supposed to advertise on this site !!).
BIAB provides the definite skeleton and with the sample libraries that I use I can do a lot more to enhance the base backing. But still a long way to go before I get to John Wilson's orchestral standard !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,167
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,167 |
I also use Cubase.
If for nothing else I find it invaluable to use RB as well as BIAB to start from for generating nultiple tracks of the realtracks that I want (as I can then edit the parts that I want in Cubase)
If you want to edit a particular realtrack that will last for duration of song, eg soloist realtrack then its very helpful to have multiple takes of the particular realtrack to choose from.
BIAB is very limited in this regard due to the limited number of tracks and so its RB to the rescue.
No big deal to do it in RB not that much to learn and then import the lot into your DAW of choice.
Musiclover
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
I don't see any problem with using another DAW here.
Was just answering the question about which one of the two pgmusic products to use and putting forth the idea that they are not an either/or situation, they are complementary. As is use of another DAW with BiaB.
One reason to learn RB, though, is the fact that it does have the BiaB autoaccompaniment generator built into it, making the addition of different or more varied accompaniment tracks a lot easier to pull off.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,598
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,598 |
Quote:
I’m still interested to know what BiaB can do that RB can’t (other than melodist and soloist) and why most people seem to prefer BiaB.
Biab has important edit features not present on realband, like transpose chords, search/replace chords, expand/reduce chord durations, and others.
I start my projects using biab to sketching the song's structure and its basic feel (I find biab much faster and intuitive than RB for this function). Then I transfer the tracks to Reaper, send the preliminary mix to the musicians, substitute the biab tracks with my own recordings, and finish the project on my DAW. If I want to use one or more original Biab tracks on the final arrangement, I find easier generating several takes on Biab and importing them on my DAW, than using realband.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,562
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,562 |
I am in the BIAB to SONAR camp, because I also learned these two programs a long time ago. However, I believe RealBand has one other advantage that neither BIAB nor any other DAW can do, and that is to regenerate just part of a RealTrack. With BIAB, I can generate several alternative full tracks and edit them down in SONAR to a preferred final single track, but RealBand would make this task simpler.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Presonus Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,947
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,947 |
Quote:
I am in the BIAB to SONAR camp, because I also learned these two programs a long time ago.
BIAB to REAPER. Old School, like Matt! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 491
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 491 |
Peter, Welcome! I have almost the same workflow as Mario.......but I use a lot of ReakTracks, that I adjust in BIAB.......especially Chord/Bass notes, to give runs where I need them. I'm happier with Sonar, as I started with it. RealBand is obviously great....there are many here who swear by it! But I need to spend as much time as possible in actually PLAYING my instruments..........so I limit the time I HAVE to spend on new (for me) technology!  Joe G.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 17
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 17 |
Thanks to everyone for all your input. I think it proves that everyone is different and it's good to have so many options. Thanks also to carkins for the video link, it's well worth watching the series if you haven't already seen it!
I think I'm going to work in a similar way to the guy in the video (except for Cubase instead of Reaper as the final step).
I like the idea of getting the basics down in BiaB, getting the right key, etc. and then adding further enhancements in RB (adding more RealTracks, MultiRiffs, MIDI, etc.) before finishing off in Cubase.
All I need to do now is start writing a new song!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
PowerTracks Pro 2026 for Windows is Here!
PowerTracks 2026 is here—bringing powerful new enhancements designed to make your production workflow faster, smoother, and more intuitive than ever.
The enhanced Mixer now shows Track Type and Instrument icons for instant track recognition, while a new grid option simplifies editing views. Non-floating windows adopt a modern title bar style, replacing the legacy blue bar.
The Master Volume is now applied at the end of the audio chain for consistent levels and full-signal master effects.
Tablature now includes a “Save bends when saving XML” option for improved compatibility with PG Music tools. Plus, you can instantly match all track heights with a simple Ctrl-release after resizing, and Add2 chords from MGU/SGU files are now fully supported... and more!
Get started today—first-time packages start at just $49.
Already using PowerTracks Pro Audio? Upgrade for as little as $29 and enjoy the latest improvements!
Order now!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,169
Posts801,502
Members40,061
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean