|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815 |
When I compare my songs against "reference" tracks, my songs sound a little "dark". When I listen to my song all the way through, my ears adjust and it sounds fine -- but I can tell a difference when the next pro track cranks up. Is it a purely EQ thing that should be adjusted in mixing or is it a global EQ thing that needs to be taken care of in mastering. Sorry for the less than "technical" terms ("dark", "sparkle"). I do compare the EQ graph (Voxengo span) but I can't tell much difference (I think that is a lack of experience, though). Here's an example: http://soundcloud.com/kevin-emmrich/01-little-bit-of-loving (this one is lacking a little in dynamics, so I have to gain stage a little more). Any thoughts on the subject?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021 |
It's really in the EQ at the mix level. The mistake most people make is to EQ and tweak each track as a separate thing. You can not do that. Frequencies accumulate(add) and they also subtract. Just like making a stew. You don't add spices to each ingredient. If you did it would be WAY to spicy,salty, etc. when you through it all together. The biggest frequencies to back of is the mids in all the instruments because vocals are all mids.The same goes with other instruments.Watch for the accumulation.Then using multiband compression on the final mix will further help
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139 |
That track sounds fine to me Kevin. Clean and well-balanced. If you are referring to "punch", maybe a bit of multiband comp like John suggested would punch it up. A touch of Ozone perhaps?
Regards,
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Pay good attention to John's advice up there.
And I'll add that the real answer to your question may just be, "BOTH" -- The mixfit is certainly very important here, the Mastering, however, should not be ignored, for if done properly, the Mastering also adds to the overall sound as well, as ANY thing done to the sound at any stage of the game should be expected to affect the sound.
Kemmrich's posted sample file is not all that bad at all IMO.
I wouldn't sweat the mentioned lack of dynamics on this one, give or take a few levels within the mix such as that lead guitar, which is sticking out a bit to my ears, given the chosen genre -- but I would recommend that you remix the file but on the second try, don't attempt to make it sound like a "finished" or Mastered file in that pass, instead, go for a good (no, great) mixfit. This is often at Volume Levels that are below what we want to hear in the finished product, something that can be taken care of later on during the Mastering pass. Digital audio seems to respond better to that sort of treatment and it takes a bit of experimentation, PRACTICE and education/learning about the use of the various plugins available to us that can work towards making that mixfit happen. Compression, used properly on tracks separately is one of the key tools, as well as the EQ, ofen necessary to "sculpt" EQ of a particular track in order to make room for other tracks that may be playing the same frequency at the same time, or perhaps to emphasize or deemphasize certain things about a certain track. For instance, use of the Graphic EQ plugin on a Guitar Track and knowing what areas of the frequency range define certain parts of the guitar sound is a very useful tool. Example, the "pick marks" of a Guitar are usually somewhere around the 5KHz mark or so, and boosting or cutting that can change the entire base sound of that guitar and how it fits into a mix. Etc.
Speaking of the Audio Compressor, it is also a good idea to Compress the vocal tracks as separate entities in the mix as well. I greatly prefer use of an Optical Compressor plugin emulator for vocals, due to the speed. This is how we can showcase a singing performance that, while the singer is not obviously having to "belt" in order to be heard overtop of the mix. Still one of the very best examples of that are the old late 60s/early 70s recordings made by The Carpenters. Optical Compressor can place a "small" voice out in front of a rather huge band if you follow what I'm trying to say.
Use of Compression is an Art in itself, that only comes together as the aspiring engineer works to study and UNDERSTAND what the Audio Compressor does that is good -- AND what it can do that is not so good. It is essential to learn to listen for "pumping" and the like, which basically means that you have set the darn thing to work TOO hard.
As far as EQ goes, study of the "Fletcher-Munson Curve" and the reason that it exists, plus awareness about those critical midrange frequencies that our ears hear a lot more readily while the low and high extremes are suppressed is absolutely essential.
Mastering Pass? "6dB per octave" is perhaps the first bit of knowledge to explore, after understanding what dB is really all about, that it MUST be cited as referenced to someting, never can be a standalone figure without being meaningless, that the 6 dB per octave rolloff is "musical" sounding in and of itself, and why that is the case.
That's a really good performance you've got there, nothing to be ashamed of, very good song values, tracking and strong performance.
Couple what you already have going on with a bit more study and effort to understand these engineering terms and the like, practice using them as that is the only way to gain the kind of experience necessary to have your product compete with those that you are comparing them to and you will have it ALL.
One excercise you can start on immediately is to direct A/B compare that song playback to a reference recording of the same style and genre that does sound like what you are after, and start trying to define the differences in what you hear in engineering terms rather than descriptives like, "warm" (really? what temperature? *g* or "dark" (What's the matter, can't you SEE it?) and how those kind of descriptors may translate into actual values about audio. For example, most people, not all, when they say, "dark" when attempting to describe an audio event, are likely trying to say that there is a lack of the higher EQ frequencies in the file, or perhaps the highs are there but there is just way too much LOW end on a track or too and using the EQ to shave the low end back rather than boosting the HIGHs may be a better answer. To find out, try it both ways and listen to the differences.
Over the years I've noticed that a lot of good songwriters and performers just don't seem to want to have to deal with the engineering aspects of this craft, many search for one-button automated answers rather than just spend the couple of months or so it would take to actually learn the ins and outs, the terminologies, the care and feeding and such that being a recording engineer demands. Well, we are built that way, but in my experience, there are no shortcuts here and each aspect that you work on learning, coupled with deep desire, will indeed be what is needed.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139 |
Mac,
Where can I find some examples of mixes you have done? I looked here and at your site, but couldn't find any.
Regards,
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,632
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,632 |
While everything stated above is true (you have to get the mix right sonicly for best results), comparing your tracks to pro level finished tracks will be futile if they haven't been mastered at all.
As 90 dB suggested; download Ozone (trial period) and run your song through a few presets. Look for presets where the enhancer is enabled. This may be the 'sparkle' of which you speak. This should give you a basic idea of what can be done later.
A dark mix (which to me implies overbearing mid-lows) can be a battle without access at the track level, but missing *sparkle* is a different thing.
Be forewarned; chasing sparkle can easily lead to abuse. The more you add the more your ears adjust and the longer you go on (tired ears) the more it gets abused.
I try to keep any effort on 'sparkle' at the beginning of a session or after a break.
Ultimately the better the original mix, the less effort is required.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,109
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,109 |
Quote:
It's really in the EQ at the mix level. The mistake most people make is to EQ and tweak each track as a separate thing. You can not do that.
Wait, I'm confused by this statement...
I thought that the way we keep a song from getting muddy is by using EQ to put each instrument in its own frequency range. That would happen at the "per track" level, would it not? If the instrument frequencies spill over onto one another, that can't be fixed af the final mix when the spillover is already a done deal, can it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,632
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,632 |
"separate thing" was key term in the quote ...
I think he meant-
Beginners make each track sound as good as it can (read solo), then try to throw it all together in a mix. It's not how a track sounds on its own (separate thing) that matters; it's how it fits with everything else. You obviously know that.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086 |
Pat,
The theory is to make those adjustments in context with the other tracks instead of "soloing" each individual track to make the adjustments so that you're making decisions for the vibe of the "whole" song.
Also a country, pop, rock, blues or jazz genre will have basic principles in common but there are subtle and sometimes not so subtle differences in how they are mixed. And of course each individual song has it's own signature.
From what I hear - sometimes "sparkle" is confused with "brightness" and all that treble tires my ears. I know what Kevin is talking about - I believe - it's that magic I call sheen which makes the mix both warm and sparkly. Pulling it off is the holy grail of mixing - especially for the home recording crowd.
Kevin,
Personally I think the basic mix has to be there and then it comes from the mastering. One thing the mastering plugs like ozone will do is show your mix faults loud and clear. I also have Final Mix which I find to be much brighter than Ozone. The T-Racks compresser I have is warmer. So there are differences in the overall sound of the plugs as well as the individual settings imo.
In the end tho I don't know how close a home studio can get to that pro record sheen and sparkle without investing serious wads of cash and trading ears with a mastering engineer. I think hardware beyond plugins is definately involved.
BTW, as the disclaimer, I'm a better mixer than I used to be and not where I wanna be - but I study this stuff every chance I get and continue to experiment to get better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
My main complaint with Ozone so far is the stupid names they have for their presets. It's almost like they took a list of nouns and a list of adjectives and randomly mixed and matched them. Exactly, I suspect, how Wrinkle Neck Mules named their band.
The topic goes back to a very astute comment Silvertones John made about a month ago on a similar post. To tell someone "Put on a commercial CD of the same genre and make it sound like that." is like saying "Look at The Mona Lisa and paint like that. If we knew what made it sound "like that" we wouldn't be posting here and working day jobs. We would be mastering engineers.
If you think about the concept that the EQ should be applied to the summed total of the work, then the next logical thought would be that the more tracks you have, the more difficult the interaction is going to be when trying to smooth a bad spot in one track. When the bass on track 2 is hot so you cut some lower end to compensate, that is also going to affect the baritone voice singing the song unless you EQ just the bass track. So I understand the concept of working the whole piece vs individual tracks, but that's why it's called learning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,109
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,109 |
Quote:
You obviously know that.
apparently not
Quote:
The theory is to make those adjustments in context with the other tracks instead of "soloing" each individual track to make the adjustments so that you're making decisions for the vibe of the "whole" song.
OHhhhh, OK. I totally misunderstood what John was saying. I thought he was advocating not using EQ on individual tracks at all.
Quote:
My main complaint with Ozone so far is the stupid names they have for their presets. It's almost like they took a list of nouns and a list of adjectives and randomly mixed and matched them. Exactly, I suspect, how Wrinkle Neck Mules named their band.
I always thought the name "wrinkle neck mules" is a euphemism similar in origin to the name used by the sex pistols. I wouldn't bet my life on it, though.
BTW, my niece is married to one of the W.N.Mules (or at least he used to be one. He's now an attorney in Richmond Va.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139 |
Mac,
Where can I find some examples of mixes you have done? I looked here and at your site, but couldn't find any.
Regards,
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086 |
Nevermind. 
Last edited by Sundance; 11/18/12 07:15 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815 |
Some really good info here, so thanks to all the comments and the in-depth analysis by Mac. It will take a little bit to digest all this. I sort of knew the answers in advance, but I wasn't confident enough in my thought process. It really is hard wearing all the hats in the music recording endeavor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021 |
Quote:
"separate thing" was key term in the quote ...
I think he meant-
Beginners make each track sound as good as it can (read solo), then try to throw it all together in a mix. It's not how a track sounds on its own (separate thing) that matters; it's how it fits with everything else. You obviously know that.
That is what I was saying.Individual tracks may sound strange when soloed but fit well when mixed.Yes Eddie the more tracks the more difficult it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Classic example of Silvertones' comment is strummed acoustic guitar in a pile of rock mixes. MOST of the content is high pass filtered out, leaving the pick strum across the strings there as mostly a rhythmic element. Unless it's a section where it's featured, then they have normally dialed in more of the low frequency content.
-Scott
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Turn on your AM or FM radio and listen to the nationwide commercial music$ there, some of it, anyway.
ALL of it has to be pristine audio, though, we all work to the same standard, or we don't get paid, whioh means that you ain't workin'...
Copyrights and such other legal issues prevent me from webpublishing work that does not belong to me.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139 |
"ALL of it has to be pristine audio, though, we all work to the same standard, or we don't get paid, whioh means that you ain't workin'..."
A personal attack? Curious, and rather sophomoric, I might add. I never said my stuff was 'pristine'. But then, I never claimed to be an expert, either.
"Copyrights and such other legal issues prevent me from webpublishing work that does not belong to me."
Some credits, then perhaps? You don't have to post the actual music. What "nationwide commercial music$" have you produced? Just curious.
Regards,
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021 |
I think Mac was making a generic statement. If it ain't pristine,in this biz you won't be getting paid and thus you're not really working.
Bob,
You have to either take or leave the info that is presented here.No pro is going to divulge that info in this Forum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139 |
I respectfully disagree. People in this business are notorious for trumpeting their achievements. Take another forum member, for instance: Harvey Gerst (sorry Harvey!) http://www.digitaldarkness.com/view/page/Harvey+Gerst Pretty impressive bio, no? Is Harvey a "Pro"? Definitely. Is he condescending to beginners? Never. My reading comprehension is adequate, and when I read: "ALL of it has to be pristine audio, though, we all work to the same standard, or we don't get paid, whioh means that you ain't workin'..." I must assume that the 'you' refers to me personally. How else would one interpret that statement? Regards, Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holiday Weekend Hours
It's Victoria Day Long Weekend in Canada. Our Customer Service hours are:
Saturday, May 16: Closed
Sunday, May 17: Closed
Monday, May 18: 8:00am - 4:00pm
Regular hours resume Tuesday, May 19th!
Today's the Last Day of the Band-in-a-Box 2026® for Mac Special!
Order before 11:59pm PDT today (May 15, 2026) to save up to 50% off your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® upgrade and receive a FREE Bonus PAK loaded with great new Add-ons to use with this new version!
Don't wait - order today!
Check out all the new features in the redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac - Special Offers End at 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th, 2026!
Order before 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th and SAVE up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® version 2026 for Mac Upgrade packages... and that's not all! With your version 2026 for Mac purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks... that's 222 NEW RealTracks available with version Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac!
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® today for as little as $49! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all available purchase options.
Learn more about the Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK here.
If you have any questions about which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We're here to help!
202 New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2026!
With Band-in-a-Box® 2026, we've released 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 468-488) in a variety of genres—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Funk & World (Sets 468-475):
Our new jazz, funk & blues RealTracks include a groovin’ collection of RealTracks and RealDrums! These include more requested “soul jazz” RealTracks featuring artists Neil Swainson (bass), Charles Treadway (organ), Brent Mason (guitar), and Wes Little (drums). There are new “smooth jazz” styles (4), which include a RealTracks first: muted trumpet, as well as slick new smooth jazz brushes options for drums. Blues lovers will be thrilled—there are more “classic acoustic blues” styles, including guitar (5), bass (4), and drums (10) with blues master Colin Linden, featuring understated and tasty background acoustic soloing, plus brushes drums and acoustic bass. There are also new electric blues RealTracks, including electric blues with PG favorite Johnny Hiland (3) and soulful electric slide guitar from Colin Linden (4). If you love funk & gospel, there are great new options this year, including gospel organ (3) from Charles Treadway, as well as new funk, tango, and rock ’n’ roll drums (3) and bass (1). And for big, bold arrangements, we have uptempo soul horns (4) featuring a three-part hip horn section with options for a full mix or stems of each individual horn — plus an accompanying rhythm section (4) of drums, bass, guitar, and electric piano!
Rock & Pop (Sets 476–482):
Our new rock & pop RealTracks bring a powerful mix of requested favorites, fresh genres, and modern chart-inspired styles! We have more of our popular “Producer Layered Acoustic Guitars (15)” featuring Band-in-a-Box favorite Brent Mason. We’ve continued our much-requested disco styles (10), and added new Celtic guitar (5) with a more basic, accessible approach than our previous Drop-D or DADGAD offerings. There are also highly requested yacht rock styles (17), inspired by the smooth, polished soft-rock sound of the late ’70s and early ’80s — laid-back grooves, silky electric pianos, warm textures, elegant harmonic movement, and pristine production aesthetics. Fans of heavier styles will love our new glam metal (13), capturing the flashy, high-energy sound of ’80s arena-ready guitar rock. We also have a set of rootsy modern-folk rock (18), with a warm, organic sound combining contemporary folk textures and driving acoustic strumming. And we’ve added lots of new modern pop styles (16) — the kinds of sounds you’re hearing on the radio today, featuring exciting new drums, synths, and cutting-edge RealTracks arrangements.
Country, & Americana (Sets 483–488):
Our new country & Americana RealTracks deliver a rich collection of acoustic, electric, and roots-inspired styles! We have new country pop (9) with legendary guitarist Brent Mason. There is also a potpourri (14) of bouzouki, guitars, banjo, and more, perfect for adding texture and character to contemporary acoustic arrangements. We’ve added funky country guitar (5) with PG favorite Brent Mason, along with classic pedal steel styles (5) featuring steel great Doug Jernigan. There are more country songwriter styles (8) that provide intimate, rootsy foundations for storytelling and modern Americana writing. Finally, we have “background soloing” acoustic guitar (12) with Brent Mason — simpler, but still very tasty acoustic lines designed to sit beautifully behind vocals or act as a subtle standalone solo part.
Check out all the 202 new RealTracks (in sets 468-488)!
And, if you are looking for more, the 2026 49-PAK (for $49) includes an impressive collection of 20 bonus RealTracks, featuring exciting and inspiring additions to add to your RealTracks library. You'll get new country-rhythm guitar styles from PG Music favorites Johnny Hiland and Brent Mason, along with modern-pop grooves that capture today’s radio-ready sound! There are also new indie-folk styles with guitar, bass, 6-string bass used as a high-chording instrument, acoustic guitar, and banjo. Plus, dedicated "cymbal fills" RealDrums provide an added layer that work very well with low-key folky styles with other percussion.
The 2026 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2026 49-PAK!
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
With your version 2026 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- iOS Android Band-in-a-Box® App
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,311
Posts803,202
Members40,093
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean