|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 90
Enthusiast
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 90 |
I am trying to put in a tune that has a coda. I have tried putting it in as an 1st ending. I realize that BIAB (2008.5) automatically makes two bar endings. I however habve gone into Options, Preference, Arrange and checked "allow any endings". I'd like my ending to be 8 bars so i set the Edit Repeats and Endings dialog from 2 to 8 but it always goes back to 2. Perhaps I need to use a coda instead. Is there any tuturial on how to use a coda?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Band in a Box calls it a "Tag" -- BB often uses pro session terminology that once may have been slang, but has become part of the compendium through usage. "Coda" is from classical musics, and means the same thing. From the BB FAQs page for BB 2008:
30. How do I use tag endings? Why does the 'tag exists' box sometimes become unchecked automatically?
In Band-in-a-Box, a tag is a group of bars played after the final chorus of a song. You can find tag settings under Edit | Settings (for this song). Set the 'Tag exists' field to Yes and then choose the tag starting and ending bars. If you have "Generate 2 bar ending" selected, the ending will play automatically after the tag.
Note that the tag will only work if there is more than one chorus. If you placed a checkmark in the 'tag exists' box in the song settings dialog, and it became unchecked, this means that your song is set to have only one chorus. In this case a tag is irrelevant because it would simply be the last bars in your chorus.
Rightclick on the bar where you want to jump to the Coda or Tag, then select Song Settings. Note the Tag Exists area near the bottom of the Song Settings window, fill it out to suit. --Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,866
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,866 |
While I do understand that this can be done in the software, I, on the other hand prefer to unfold the chorus into one big chorus as BB calls it....
I simply copy the ending measures in a chorus and paste it on the end making any needed edits to make it work.
That's how I do tags. I can opt for one, two, or more tags into the ending.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 794
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 794 |
While I do understand that this can be done in the software, I, on the other hand prefer to unfold the chorus into one big chorus as BB calls it....
I simply copy the ending measures in a chorus and paste it on the end making any needed edits to make it work.
That's how I do tags. I can opt for one, two, or more tags into the ending. +1 for this method. For any songs with anything more than a simple tag end, one big chorus is the way to go. Far more flexible when it comes to parts and variations also.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 463
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 463 |
WW,
If you right-click the bar in question, in the drop-down list is Repeats/Codas etc.
Left-click and this brings up all your options and a Help button.
HTH.
Percy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,866
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,866 |
Try my method to "clean up" the song.
Unfold the chorus and it will display exactly like it plays.... then edit it accordingly.
All that stuff about tags and repeats and such was too complicated to deal with for me when I first started using BB to write my tunes..... to simplify the process, I started unfolding everything and that is one of the first things I do now on a new song.
When writing, I need the muse to flow and trying to figure out how to do this or that was blocking that muse......
Unfold.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,094
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,094 |
I'm not sure that I agree that unfolding is the correct answer. I rarely unfold.
It seems that multiple choruses, tags, intro's etc are there for a reason and ought to be able to be used properly and effectively. If there is a problem with those functions, then they need to be sorted out, rather than just making a song that is supposed to have multiple repeat choruses not actually using those repeats to make it play correctly.
Unfolding it not how I would approach resolving it. To each their own, though.
Just sayin'
Regards
VideoTrack
BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,866
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,866 |
Sometimes, it's just too complicated for me to even try to use the musical "road maps" to notate where a song is to go next.
V V C V C B C TT.... to me that is easier done unfolded. It's a simple matter of copying and pasting the parts and I know it goes where it's supposed to go.
I'm not knocking or putting down those who do use the "proper road maps" in their music. Heck, as a music student learning piano, I certainly learned to read the signs.... ||:repeat:||, DC al Coda, coda, etc....
Now days, I take the path of least resistance.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,094
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,094 |
Sometimes, it's just too complicated for me to even try to use the musical "road maps" to notate where a song is to go next.
V V C V C B C TT.... to me that is easier done unfolded. It's a simple matter of copying and pasting the parts and I know it goes where it's supposed to go.
I'm not knocking or putting down those who do use the "proper road maps" in their music. Heck, as a music student learning piano, I certainly learned to read the signs.... ||:repeat:||, DC al Coda, coda, etc....
Now days, I take the path of least resistance. Good comment Herb, yep, I can see your point. I too trained classically, music theory, scales, exams, Dal Segno's, DemiSemiQuavers, Arpeggios, Appoggiatura's (I hope I can remember the spelling), the lot. Yes, the full-blown way perhaps wasn't nearly as much fun... Cheers VideoTrack
BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Depends on what I need to accomplish here.
It is good to have options.
Whether using the "Unfold to one long song" (;durchkompniert)or the choruses, it is the end performance that really counts.
For those who must have a printed LeadSheet that makes sense, though, it is best to learn how to properly use the Choruses, Tag, etc. in order to be able to print a LeadSheet that the other musicians won't balk about (and understandably so).
In the real world of Music Theory, there is no such thing as a "Verse and a Chorus" as being separate. Those are terms used to describe Lyrics, not music. In actuality, the Verse AND the Chorus represents only a Chorus, musically speaking.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 647
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 647 |
I find that it is best to build the song "unfolded". This means setting the number of choruses to 1, and intially seeting the number of bars to 200 or so. The actual number isn't important as you can fix it later.
The next thing is to determine where the song starts - this is often bar 5, but not always. Then where does the first ending start, and how long is it. This information all goes into the drop-down list is Repeats/Codas etc.
You might also find that you can use repeats, rather than endings.
The thing to remember is that this as a PRINT function and does not affect the flow of the song. BIAB plays the unfolded song, whether you have the repeats or endings correct or not.
The DS-Coda works if you want to jump from somewhere in the song to get to a specific set of bars at the end. (remember in the unfolded song, the coda will always be at the end)
If the coda is really just a different ending, you don't need a DS-Coda at all. I also often have the song just drop through the last ending (or repeat) to add the final bars that I need.
For the most part, it does work if you remember all of the fake book stuff is just a print function. BIAB plays the bars in a linear manner, and not based on your 'printed' presentation.
BIAB for Windows Version 2019 (643)
Windows 10 (1909)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 392
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 392 |
@MAC..."In the real world of Music Theory, there is no such thing as a "Verse and a Chorus" as being separate. Those are terms used to describe Lyrics, not music. In actuality, the Verse AND the Chorus represents only a Chorus, musically speaking."
With great respect Mac, I can't agree with you on the above.
"Verses" and/or "Choruses" may or may not have lyrics. Instrumentals of course, have no lyrics at all so if those sections only related to lyrics, there would be no such thing as instrumental music.
And learned musicians in the jazz and "pop" worlds use "verse" "chorus" terms differently and yet quite correctly for their respective versions of music.
So, there really isn't ONE correct definition of those terms in theory. It depends on the genre.
I also hold that versus and choruses of the MUSIC have, by definition, a quite different character musically and to the ear...are quite distinguishable...as would be the "bridge" or "middle 8" as bridges are sometimes called.
Just to go one step further to say that "lyrics"...which aren't "music"...but rather are poetic...have stanzas not versus or choruses.
All the above is why single composers are properly cited as "Words and Music by...." While co-composers are "Words by X and Music by Y".
Having said all THAT...it is nevertheless true that co-authors of a composition have an undivided interest in the copyright to BOTH the words and music regardless.
Best,
Jim
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Well, Jim, we have and use as living language and as such, these types of definitions are subject to the changes that become inevitable. Nothing wrong with that.
The point I waa trying to get across, however, is that still today in Universities and other Music Schools, for the most part, the old nomenclature that came out of Germany some two or more centuries ago, is the terminology taught.
And there is likely very good reason for that, but as you say, those who view it differently are able to perceive - and use - terminologies that they like better.
Consider the word, "verse" - which connotes the written word and not a musical passage that has no lyrics or words to it.
I have yet to run across a musical composition form that defies being laid out in the Classical Chorus method or the Durchkomponeirt (One Long Song) method.
But sometimes it takes a bit of study of the particular song in order to figure out exactly what constitutes the repeated Chorus, musically, not lyrically, speaking.
Nuthin' wrong with either method.
After all, it is what it sounds like when its done that is the goal, not the methodology.
"Git-R-Done!"
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 392
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,203
Posts801,908
Members40,067
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean