|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086 |
I'm using the free lame encoder with audacity to convert wav to mp3. Setting at 256 sounds decent going below that not so good. 128 would be a smaller file size - any tips on making it sound better at 128 converting from a BB or RB master wave file or does that size only work for pro mastered music? I apologize for being so clueless  but I've never been into mp3 other than listening before and was fairly stunned at how crappy my stuff sounds at 128. Thanks in advance for your help. Sundance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,199
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,199 |
Considering that 90% information is missing, it's not too hard to understand why music sounds so bad.
Personally, I usually use 320kbs if I want a half way decent sound for upload. Yeah, the file sizes are bigger, but the sound is better.
Provided you're happy with the wave files, and you're happy at 256, don't compress more than 256.
Gary
I'm blessed watching God do what He does best. I've had a few rough years, and I'm still not back to where I want to be, but I'm on the way and things are looking far better now than what they were!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,586
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,586 |
Sundance,
CD quality is 128 kB/s and 44100 Hz. This means that 128 can sound good. I don't have a great deal of experience in Audacity but in Goldwave I convert all WAVs to 128/44100 and it sounds fine. Have you double-checked that the 44100 Hz is set as well as the 128? (From what I understand of Audacity, 44100 is set under "Set Rate" - found under the little arrow to the right of the file name.
Noel
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 235
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 235 |
I don't know about the audicity settings, since I don't use it in fact. But fact is that the settings as described above is 44.1k for the samplefrequency and the bitrate at 16. Eventhough 22.05k can sometimes still sound acceptable, but you cut off higher frequencies a lot. A 44.1k will contain information upto 22 khz, while a 22 kHz samplerate will not go beyond 11 kHz frequencies. A stereomix will most likely exceed the 11kHz by far.
To give an indication: the old cassetete decks often recorded not much more than approx 15-16 kHz. Most (older) adults also won't go much beyond that... Which means that you would miss out a lot sampling at 22k. A 32kHz samplerate (16kHz response) might therefore be still the limit for acceptable quality.
I'll be back...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Noel, CD quality is certainly NOT 128 kbps. That's 128 kilobits per second. CDs are roughly 10 MegaBYTES per minute. Considering that a BYTE is 8 bits, that makes CD quality 80 Megabits per minute. There's 60 seconds in a minute, so dividing 80 Mbpm by 60 gives 1.33 Megabits per second.
WAY more data density than 128 kpbs. A thousand times more data. That's why .mp3 files are so much smaller than their .wav counterparts, which at 16 bit data width and 44100 Hz sample rate ARE CD quality.
.mp3, ogg vorbis, WMA, and any of the other audio data compression schemes use various algorithms and decisions in those algorithms to decide how much of the data to 'throw away' in the compression scheme. One thing .mp3 compression does across the board is simply eliminate all data above 14 kHz. No matter what bit rate is used.
I will agree with you that with some music, and some .mp3 compression, and dependent on the data playback, you can get decent sounding 128 kbps mp3 files. But it is highly dependent on the program material used, compression scheme used, playback system, etc.
For my personal CD collection for playback in my car, I have chosen to use 192 kpbs compression with .mp3 files. I find that I really can't tell the difference between these files and CDs of the same material played back in the car. With 128 kbps files, I can usually hear artifacts of the compression on sibilant vocal sounds, and the high-frequency parts of ride cymbals, crash cymbals, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,586
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,586 |
Thanks rockstar_not, I appreciate the math help  I see it's a subject that you are very passionate about. I also see that I have (con)fused my understanding of WAV, RAW and mp3 formats and have combined them into some form of hybrid, erroneous idea. I appreciate being set on the right path. If you are interested, this html link supports your choice of 192 kbps. The author reaches his conclusion through some qualitative and quantitative analyses. It's interesting reading.
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
*Did you also download and install the LAME encoder that is on the Audacity website?
If you are trying to use one of the codecs that came installed with your OS, it cannot sound as good as LAME now does.
Fraunhofer haulted development long ago, LAME kept going...
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086 |
Thank you all. I'm wanting to upload some songs to somewhere - soundclick, myspace, motagator - haven't decided which host yet. 256 sounds fine - I just wanted to be sure there wasn't some way to do it at 128 that I didn't know about that would sound just as good.
Yes, it's the LAME from the website.
Sundance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
*Many sharing sites may limit your choice to 128kbps mp3 for the sake of webstreaming and limiting storage size.
Check out the rules of the chosen site first.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,206
Posts801,938
Members40,068
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean