|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,427
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,427 |
I was thinking of reworking an old composition of mine using BIAB to provide perhaps bass and keyboard parts, but I can't input it properly to BIAB. The trouble is this, I did the drum parts on a drum machine (I no longer have) and went by feel, etc. and as a musician with no formal training I can't now quite figure out what time signatures I composed! I think it may be 3/4 (12/8?) but parts feel more 4/4 to me, like the parts 'When will love break my fall'. Could someone take a listen and tell me what meter(s) I inadertently programmed back then? Many thanks.  'What Might Have Been' John
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,926
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,926 |
John, it sounds like slow 4 to me also, with a definite triplet feel in places. Purt nice programming on the drum machine.
The guitar work at the end is gorgeous. Can't wait to hear the reworked version.
R.
"My primary musical instrument is the personal computer."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,572
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,572 |
Hi John. Your song feels like it is in 12/8. One bar of 12/8 can be beat in a slow four count, at metronome marking 65. Look for a slow ballad style that gives the 12/8 feel. It might be easier on the eyes to notate it in 6/8, though it could just as easily be written in 4/4. There were two spots where a beat was dropped to make things interesting.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,587
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,587 |
The song definitely sounds 12/8 to me. The counting for this would be:
1 and ah, 2 and ah, 3 and ah, 4 and ah. (12 distinct beats).
When you can say "Canada" and it fits the rhythm of each main beat, you know you have 12/8 (or mabye 6/8). John, the reason your song sounds 12/8 to me is because I can also hear 4 distinct beats - these are split into triplets. In 6/8, there would only be two distinct beats (like a march).
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,716
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,716 |
Hi John, First of all this is one fantastic song. Great vox and super guitar parts.
I agree with the others that this is 12/8 or a slow 4/4. If you were going to print notation parts I would definitely use 4/4. That way the notation will be accurate.
OK, a random thought;
Why does toilet paper need a commercial? Who's not buying it?
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
The Intro is in Even Feel 4, actually two bars of 4/4 straight, then the song starts in a 6/8 feel but at the same Tempo as the quarter note beat of the intro.
That 6/8 could be done as a 12/8 also, with half as many bars. The reason I am emphatic about it being 6/8 has to do with how your lyric line subdivides the beat. That makes it a 6 and not really a 12. However, it is relatively common to notate such as 12/8 to avoid the "march trio" interpretation from chart readers.
OR -- a 2/4 Triplet divided Swing style, or a 4/4 style that is triplet divided, often described as a "12/8" style.
Good job.
Especially like the bit of Ear Candy at the end, icing on the cake sort of thing.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,576
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,576 |
Wow! First off I just want to say this song is fantastic. Brings out some kind of feeling in me from my past. (Looooong agoooo)  It's definitely a 12/8 with an arpedgio feeling to it. I opened BIAB and set the key to EM. I found a country gospel style called, "C_Gospel Country Gospel Style 12/8", wrote an EM chord and let it fly. The start isn't right but the rhythm is about identicle. I set the tempo to 90 and got it pretty close. Too much reverb on the vox but the guitar was nothing short of splendid. Good on ya Mate. It's a keeper. BTW I've never heard this one before. Is it an original or cover?
Russ Anyday above ground is a good day Computer is Hp Pavillion Vision 6 Ghz quad core AMD processor 8 Gig memory 1 TB hard drive 6 GB hard drive Windows 7 Premium Loose nut behind the keyboard 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,576
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,576 |
Quote:
The Intro is in Even Feel 4, actually two bars of 4/4 straight, then the song starts in a 6/8 feel but at the same Tempo as the quarter note beat of the intro.
That 6/8 could be done as a 12/8 also, with half as many bars. The reason I am emphatic about it being 6/8 has to do with how your lyric line subdivides the beat. That makes it a 6 and not really a 12. However, it is relatively common to notate such as 12/8 to avoid the "march trio" interpretation from chart readers.
--Mac
I agree with that. I tried the 6/8 style, "C_68 Feel W 8 Country 6 8 feel". It does give the same feel but the 12/8 is fuller. It's more arpegiatted sounding. Easier on the ears and soul. I supposed you could mix 'em up a bit. Use it in a part marker or such. Man I love Band in a box! 
Russ Anyday above ground is a good day Computer is Hp Pavillion Vision 6 Ghz quad core AMD processor 8 Gig memory 1 TB hard drive 6 GB hard drive Windows 7 Premium Loose nut behind the keyboard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,427
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,427 |
Thanks guys! That's got me on the right track. Thanks also for the complements Ryszard, Mario, Mac, Russ, greatly appreciated. Maybe I should leave well enough alone! It's just that when I originally recorded this I didn't have Sonar and I 'printed' the reverb on my ADAT tapes. You're right Russ, beginners error there, too much reverb. Also, now I can replace the Alesis SR16 drum machine sounds with the ultra realistic Addictive Drums, which I think are just amazing. You guys tried them yet? Russ, many thanks for finding that style, it's set me off now. And yes, Russ it's an original song of mine, yearning for lost youth now, so had to set the feelings down! The challenge of course will be to reproduce all those guitar harmonies (four altogether) and the feeling that went into them. If I do produce another version it's just going to have to be an entirely mew 'cover' of my own song!  John
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,724
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,724 |
I see from the post above the tempo and sig have been figured out, all I want to add is that this is a damn good song performed very well!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,427
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,427 |
Cheers, Danny, much appreciated.
John
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
I don't think the reverb is a kill here at all.
Strong Performance outweighs those kind of considerations.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,576
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,576 |
Quote:
I don't think the reverb is a kill here at all.
Strong Performance outweighs those kind of considerations.
--Mac
Oh I agree fully. That was only to be a consideration should he decide he wants to rework the song from scratch. He's got the stuff to do it with now.
As to guitar harmonies. If you have PTW then you have the TCHelicon. It works very well for creating harmonies. Here's the trick to it.
1. Create the song in BIAB
2. Create the main guitar lead in midi format
3. When finished save the song as a midi
4. Open the song in PTW
5. Now play the main guitar lead
6. Open the TCHelicon and select for it to follow the midi tracks
7. Click on OK and make sure it's set up to creat an individual track for each harmony
8. Click on OK again and let 'er rip
9. Now you will have up to 4 tracks of guitar harmony
The other trick is to create everything in as high a bit rate as your card will allow. Once everything is completed you can convert it back to 16/44.1 or whatever you prefer.
By the way, I was shocked to learn that Real Band won't support over 48 bits. If you are in 16/96 like the last song I made the machine locks and starts stuttering badly. I didn't know it had that limitation until I went into the help file to see if I could figger out how to get around the problem. Once I converted it back to 16/48 it ran smooth as silk.
BTW I believe you can run it in 24/48 too. Just not over 48. If anybody doubts me on this just open the help file and look bit rates up. You'll find it's limited to 48 bit. PTW isn't. Just thought y'all'd like to know.
Russ Anyday above ground is a good day Computer is Hp Pavillion Vision 6 Ghz quad core AMD processor 8 Gig memory 1 TB hard drive 6 GB hard drive Windows 7 Premium Loose nut behind the keyboard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 36
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 36 |
John,
very nice song, I too love the guitar work at the end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,610
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,610 |
24/48 is about as good as you'll get in reality. 24bit/96kHz sounds better in theory (on paper) but really is not a percieved improvement with anybody I have spoken with. Just doubles the file size.
24/44 is fine most times. There is a bigger improvement going from 16 bit to 24 bit than going from the 44kHz to 48kHz or even 96..
Has to do with the size of the chunks of the samples taken during recording.
The bit size determines how long each sample lasts (the size of the chunk over time) and the frequency is how often the samples occur. There is a math formula that says that the frequency cut in half is approximately the reproduced sample frequency range. In other words if you record at 44kHz you can reproduce 22 kHz frequencies (almost) and if you go to 48 kHz you can reproduce 24kHz (not much change there)...and going to 96 means we can theoretically produce up to 48kHz (great for songs you want to play for your dog).
But the bit rate or chunk size adds a lot of depth to the frequency range that IS being reproduced..
Better to use 24 bit with only 44 kHz than to try 16 bit with higher frequencies.
Sonicly speaking anyways..
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,163
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,163 |
Excellent job with this Shuffle beat. One of my fav beats, by the way.
It sounds outstanding as is.
Trax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086 |
"it sounds outstanding as is"
+1
Sundance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436 |
John;
I really liked it as it is. That is some sweeet guitar work. The solo just took me away, and the ending just lets you down so nice.
If I had songs like that under my belt, I would not be thinking of a re-make. Very good original production values. Great work.
Good luck on where ever you take this. . . .
Gene
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,427
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,427 |
Many thanks Mac, Russ, Tom, Trax, Sundance, Gene. Much appreciated.
Thanks to all for listening and for all the input. I've decided to go back to work on a couple of other originals and get those finished before I go back to this one, which anyway poses a risk of disturbing the 'pixie dust'!
John
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,221
Posts802,040
Members40,070
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean