|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,281
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,281 |
Happy New Years to everyone! I have read a few questions on the new feature about the benefits and dangers of erasing the "unneeded" +- files. My question is; other than the reduction in HD space used by this files, is there any difference as far as sound quality or generation of the RT's if I choose not to erase them using the new stretching capabilities?
I have also read about the "dont's" on slower XP machines. I'm currently using a Gateway Pentium 4 with 2.6 GHz and 4 GB Ram, is that considered an slow machine for this purpose? I have not had any problems so far on creating my songs on previous versions of BIB. Currently waiting for the DVD's to arrive, can't wait!
Thanks for the answers
Mike B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 493
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 493 |
Check in the RT settings and see if the 'use +/- files' checkbox is checked or not (might say something different - can't remember exactly what it says). If it isn't checked, you are using the new stretching algorithms. If you want to see how much longer it is taking to generate a song, time one with and without the box checked. If you can live with the difference, erase them if you want to gain some hd space. If you don't need the space, leave them there and if you want the speed back check the box. Nothing to loose by leaving them there except the hd space. Your call pretty much.
Good luck.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021 |
My Lenovo of course is fine. The Toshiba is fine with the new file stretcher however I had to create a new hardware profile the disabled all unnecessary stuff such as the network card.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,607
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,607 |
Don't make the decision on speed alone; actually listen for a difference also.
The new way should actually sound better.. at least it has to many of us.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,569
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,569 |
Mike, good advice above. Also, you could run Geekbench on your PC and tell us what you get. It's free at http://www.primatelabs.ca/geekbench/ PG Music did not set a minimum score, but there are a few other known scores out there to compare to.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,281
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,281 |
Thanks for all the answers to all of you. So can I assume that even if I have the +- box checked if I'm not deleting the unnecessary files (space is no an issue at this moment, they are all in an external HD), still the new and old RT,s are going to benefit from the new engine? i have tried a couple of them changing the tempo by quite a difference and even the real drums seem to sound better.
Mike B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,281
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,281 |
And Matt, here are the scores:
Integer Processor integer performance 1153
Floating Point Processor floating point performance 1041
Memory Memory performance 1040
Stream Memory bandwidth performance 1060
Total score = 1081
Not sure what it all means, but I hope you'll tell me.
Thanks again
Mike B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,569
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,569 |
Mike, about the +/- checkbox, in Options Preferences RealTracks, there is a checkbox that says "Use +/- RealTracks for Generation". If you UNCHECK this box and everything works fine, sounds good and the Task Manager CPU% does not peak well above 60%, then you could most likely (after a suitable period of testing to be sure) press the button, "Erase unneeded +/- Files". In my case, I did the "Erase" command on a copy of the files, and left the original distribution hard drive untouched, as a backup. Remember, unchecking that checkbox means you are NOT using the "old" style of RealTracks, so they are then superfluous if everything is OK.
About Geekbench, the forum does not have Geekbench reference numbers for machines that work and do not work with the new engine and RealTracks. We probably should start collecting that by anecdotal evidence.
We do know from another post that a PC of about 4 years old vintage with a score of around 1000 was said to work OK. A few others reported scores of 1200 and they did not say the new engine didn't work. Mine is a two-year old Core 2 Duo with a score of 3000. One user of an Intel I5 got a score of almost 6,000. Apparently, the number of cores you have is a multiplier, and BIAB does benefit from using more than one core.
What does it all mean about Geekbench? We won't know for certain until more users on the borderline like yourself report in that it works or does not work without the old +/- files.
One last caveat: if you do erase the old +/- files, you cannot then use older versions of BIAB with that altered RealTracks folder. Versions from 2010.5 and before require those +/- files. I don't know why anyone would want to use an older version after hearing the improvements from 2011. Even if they had an old and slow PC, they could check the checkbox and use the old files with the 2011 version.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,281
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,281 |
Yes I agree on why would anybody go back to an older version of BIB, to me the new stretching capabilities would make me decide in favor of upgrading, it's like having a whole lot of new RT's at my disposal. On the issue about deleting the +/- files (I have them all backed up anyway)I'll probably leave them alone for now until I try the performance as you suggested.
Thanks for your help.
Mike B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021 |
The other thing that made me keep looking was that when you install the new 2011 over the top of the 2010 or 2010.5 etc. Any RTs that are new for 2011 WILL NOT have the +/- files anyway so in essence you'll be using a half&half system. I confirmed this in BETA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,569
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,569 |
Yes, John is saying the same thing I did in another way, and that's helpful. To put it even differently again, you cannot use the newest 2011 RealTracks in versions of BIAB that are 2010.5 or older, so that's another reason why it would be strange to go back to an earlier version.
While this introduces a compatibility problem for users of earlier versions, it is more than offset by the fact that the program can now be distributed on much smaller media.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021 |
And if you choose to use 2011 and keep the +/- files the NEW RTs will have to use the new system anyway as they don't come with +/- files.You have 3 choices:
1. stay with an older version and don't upgrade
2. Upgrade and find a way to make it work with +/- files removed
3. Buy a new computer.
BTW if you don't use BIAB live another option is remove the +/- files but leave "fast generation" unchecked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,281
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,281 |
Again, thanks to everyone for pitching in on this subject. Very helpful as always.
Mike B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 46
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 46 |
I have been looking to upgrade my computer and
have been following this post with great interest.
Prior to BIAB 2010.5, without the new stretch feature,
I don't recall experiencing any audio issues.
Since using BIAB 2011, with the new stretch feature,
I started noticing audio drop out.
I tweaked my computer system trying to reduce other background functions that
placed demands on the system, it help a little but occasion audio drop out still would occur.
Using Task Manager to monitor the computer's performance, while using BIAB with the new stretch feature, CPU usage would peak and hang at 100% very often, rarely drop down to the 60 range, but available RAM would remain at 400MB or more.
Testing my system with Geekbench without any other programs running:
Geekbench Score 1510
Processor interger performance 1585
Processor floating point performance 2000
Memory performance 900
Memory bandwidth performance 758
Op. System Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition
Model HP Pavilion 061 EL494AA-ABA a1226n
Processor AMD Athlon 64 Processor 3400+ (1 processor 1 Core 1 Thread)
Memory 1.44 GB 400Mhz
Processor Frequency 2.19
Buss speed 200MHz
L1 Cache 64 KB
L2 Cache 512 KB
L3 Cache 0
I really like the new stretch feature in BIAB 2011,
but I feel my processor speed, Buss speed, L2 cache size, and Ram speed are a little weak to support the demands this new stretch feature demands.
It will be interesting to see other folks Geekbench results and experiences with BIAB 2011 and the new stretch feature.
Bill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Hi DHD,
Bill, I ran pretty much the same system during the beta test as you cite here.
Was able to run everything in BB2011 okay - but I did have to defrag my hard disk first, after loading the new program and realtracks.
You might try the defrag.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 46
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 46 |
Hi Mac.
I did defrag when I first started noticing the audio drop outs,
I also eliminated or shut down as much background stuff as I could.
Thank you for your sugesstion.
Bill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,281
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,281 |
Ok, here's what I've done since I was also experiencing some drop-outs and glitches; 1. disabled the fast RT generation thing, 2. unchecked the +/- files usage to try it with older RT's (it works fine)and 3.left checked the high quality regeneration (or something to that effect) when stretching the RT's. So far I have noticed a vast improvement on the elimination of audio drop-outs and glitches. I have not checked the CPU usage afterward, but so far is fine. I'll report later if there are any changes.
Later
Mike B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,569
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,569 |
Good report. If you are using the +/- files, an interesting test for your machine would be to try the newest RealTracks that do not have the +/- files, such as vibes.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,281
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,281 |
Ok Matt, I try them both ways, with and without it and no problem here with the new RT's with the +/- enabled. kept an eye on the CPU usage, and except for one instance that picked for a second at almost 100%, the rest of the time was below 50%, most of the time actually at around 15-30%. So I guess I'm good for now.
Mike B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,205
Posts801,934
Members40,068
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean