Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
I guess you have been playing the AkP in VSTi mode, through a host? If that host is set to use ASIO4ALL, the result will probably be about the same as using the standalone set to use that same driver.

Maybe not, though. Worth a try.

The extra RAM must help. A processor running 1.6 is not a negligible thing, even if it sounds a little slow nowadays.

Last edited by allis; 01/19/09 02:41 AM.

Larry
______
Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 901
J
joan Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
J
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 901
Allis, there doesn't seem to be much difference. I don't know if I'm running it through a host. I just have Akoustik piano's main program, a midi connection to my Roland, and using the Sound Card that is installed on this ASUS. I have an Intel Celeron M 353 @ 900 Mhz. Realtek HD Audio input and output. Using PC Wizard I found that I was getting 791.65 global performance.

Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Using a "host" would mean that you had the Akoustik Piano loaded into something like Sonar or Cantabile, which will let you play the VSTi version Sounds like you were not using VSTi, but what is usually called the Standalone program. Some virtual instruments (like Ivory) don't even have a standalone mode and must always play through hosts.

So I jumped to conclusions, including your processor speed. But if it doesn't hiccup too much now, maybe the extra RAM will still let it play more smoothly. As you say, it's already useful the way it is, so any improvement will be just gravy on the rice.


Larry
______
Off-Topic
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
M
Mac Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
M
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
I'd like to see what the Atom processor in the same machine could do with that...


--Mac

Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Me too. One of us may have to give it a try. Any nice, big VI piano running on something that small and cheap would be wonderful.

Joan's Celeron could prove out, with lots of memory. It doesn't sound like it's all THAT far off now.

Isn't the Win XP provided with those net-things supposed to be much slimmed down, with low overhead?


Larry
______
Off-Topic
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333
Not sure about low overhead but I had to go into settings and tweak how it used the network it made it slow cause it was dropping the network when it was inactive and trying to reactivate it when you touched it next.

I heard the Vista version lets you bump the memory to 5 gigs by using Readyboost, a utility that ships with vista.


John Conley
Musica est vita
Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 901
J
joan Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
J
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 901
All the other AsusEeePC's other than the Best Buy model that I bought are now coming with the Atom processor. But for the closeout Best Buy price of $330 now for my model it's hard to pass up.

Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Quote:

... $330 ... hard to pass up.




I should say! And when the Akoustik Piano plays, it must be even more appealing.


Larry
______
Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 901
J
joan Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
J
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 901
I just installed 2Gigs of Ram in my Asus EeePC.

Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Quote:

I just installed 2Gigs of Ram in my Asus EeePC.





Way to go! What effect does it have on the operation of the piano?


Does that take a single 1-gig DIMM to expand it? Or do you need to use a 2-gig one? Not that the price is much different nowadays...

I have heard that there's one gig soldered permanently in, and you can simply add a second one. But somebody else mentioned he had to throw away an installed DIMM and get a bigger one. Perhaps these were different brands of Netbook...


Larry
______
Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 901
J
joan Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
J
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 901
I removed the 1 gig of ram and installed a 2 gig chip. This one came out so easily.
I used this YouTube tutorial:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKUi0nQFPSw

The only little problem I had was figuring out how to get the bottom panel door open.
Here are my notes on the problem:
I unscrewed the 2 screws holding the door.
They clicked and didn't unscrew totally or easily because on the inside there was a washer of some sort.
Then when they were both unscrewed the door didn't seem to come up.
I discovered there were 2 side notches along with the 2 back notches that needed to be carefully handled. Midway up the left and right side was a slot that needed to be pressed or moved slightly for the cover to be opened and then resettled in the correct place when putting the cover back on.
__________________________________________________
Now I think the start up time is quicker with the 2 gig Ram install. It seems so fast on both startup and shut down.

Not sure what else might be improved yet.

Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
You're rockin'. Thanks for these updates.

That video obliterates mystery. And any sensation of extra speed and smoother running is promising. I see hints that some of those netbooks apparently have a sort of E-Z overclocking feature, too. Perhaps not the Celerons.

Once you have an impression of whether the piano runs better, you'll be getting to the nifty part.


Larry
______
Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 901
J
joan Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
J
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 901
I have a question about battery life. I was reading the eee forum about not leaving the netbook plugged in 24/7. How often after the initial break in period (where I discharged the battery several times and let it recharge) should I work using battery power instead of plugged in power?

Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 901
J
joan Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
J
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 901
I recorded a piece this afternoon using Akoustik Piano on my Eee. I chose the audio driver that is on the netbook--Realtek HD Audio at 44100 yielding 10ms latency. It seemed to have an easy time recording.

I tried the Asio4all but couldn't get that to be able to play even at 33ms and higher.

Here is Bach's BWV 933 Prelude in C Major on boxnet recorded using my Roland FP-4--Akouskik Piano's Steinway Hamburg D virtual piano and my Eee netbook.
http://www.box.net/shared/v0qnq6xrsq

Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
That sounds fine! The Celeron has made the cut. There are no no dropouts or glitches; the piano sound is terrific. The hard drive is doing well -- no noise from disk-streaming blips. The 10 Ms latency is OK, don't you find? I have no trouble adapting to latency until it goes over 20. Apparently this is a winner, a cheap and good portable piano module for you.

I found a YouTube video that explained the "overclocking" references. Apparently the Celeron 900 was deliberately throttled back in the original Eee, to save battery. In BIOS, you can find a slider to twitch it up to the full 900 MHz.

I can only guess from using batteries in rechargeable power tools, but I bet you should run the battery down and recharge at least once a month or so. Somebody with laptop experience will know better.


Larry
______
Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 901
J
joan Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
J
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 901
Allis,
______________________________________________________________
"I found a YouTube video that explained the "overclocking" references. Apparently the Celeron 900 was deliberately throttled back in the original Eee, to save battery. In BIOS, you can find a slider to twitch it up to the full 900 MHz."
_____________________________________________________________
If I were to do this to increase to 900MHz would it create a shorter battery time or create more heat in the netbook. Sounds like something I might like to try to get more speed.

Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Quote:


If I were to do this to increase to 900MHz would it create a shorter battery time or create more heat in the netbook. Sounds like something I might like to try to get more speed.





It would very likely do both those undesirable things. But in practice, good effects may outweigh the bad. You may not be able to speed up anyway; evidently only "early models" were underclocked at the factory. I now expect that would not include the 10-inch machines, which came last. If yours is up-clockable in the BIOS, I'd give it a try and see if the bad effects are all that bad. (I have read that the screen gets brighter, too, when speed is set higher. Probably the whole system's voltage is increased a little.) But it's probably not possible.

Some better news: The 900 Celeron Mobile was apparently a more efficient processor than this Atom thing. Atoms -- it says here -- use less power, but they achieve equivalent performance only by using a faster clock speed. So the Celeron is not actually a handicap, in spite of lower MHz.

Mind you, I still know only what I read. Asking some direct questions in the Eee Forum might help more. Those people get right into these things. Their daring modifications to the computers are fun to see.


Larry
______
Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Quote:

...increase to 900MHz...Sounds like something I might like to try to get more speed.





Does that imply you actually WERE getting glitches in the playing? I couldn't hear anything attributable to lack of processor power, but maybe you can feel things the listener can't hear. Or maybe you mean loading samples takes a long time, or something like that?


Larry
______
Off-Topic
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
M
Mac Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
M
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Lappy designers also like to use CPU throttle-back as part of power saving scheme.

Check your Power settings in the Control Panel carefully, for music making I like to set all AC power settings to "Always On" or the like, leaving only the battery side for CPU rampdowns and throttlebacks.

Often, the CPU cannot throttle up in time for audio creation stuff like that piano.


--Mac

Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 603
Quote:

Lappy designers also like to use CPU throttle-back as part of power saving scheme.





That's surely what it was for, Mac. In the Asus Eee, they set those first 7" ones underclocked to a fixed maximum speed of 600, a huge throttle. But that maximum is controllable by a simple slider, and you don't have to know anything about clocking.

If Joan enjoyed any success (as she has), I was thinking about getting a totally-cheap 7" Eee for a vest-pocket instrument module, since keyboard and screen size don't matter for that. But it's so small there's no space to upgrade drives sensibly. I guess the tiniest Eee is out, as a sample player.


Larry
______
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!

All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!

It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.

What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?

XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!

Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!

The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.

The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.

The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.

Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.

The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.

Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!

Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos

With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.

Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.

Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!

Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.

Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!

Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.

2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.

Holiday Weekend Hours

As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:

April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours

Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!

— Team PG

Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!

If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!

If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!

Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.

Forum Statistics
Forums57
Topics86,220
Posts802,029
Members40,070
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
Newest Members
Orchestr8, dimtass, Quamido Pirendo, Allan63, isledge
40,070 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 127
zedd 110
DC Ron 94
rsdean 86
Noel96 76
Today's Birthdays
flashlarue, gary133, kirbonite
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5