|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815 |
Quote:
I respectfully disagree. .... My reading comprehension is adequate, and when I read:
"ALL of it has to be pristine audio, though, we all work to the same standard, or we don't get paid, whioh means that you ain't workin'..."
I must assume that the 'you' refers to me personally. How else would one interpret that statement? -- Bob
Bob, I saw that reply before you responded and I didn't take the "you" to be "YOU" personally. I could be wrong, but I think your interpretation is open to interpretation. I read that as a global "you".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,932
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,932 |
I read that as the universal "you", not "you" personally. FWIW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021 |
Quote:
I read that as the universal "you", not "you" personally. FWIW
So did I.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021 |
Quote:
I respectfully disagree. People in this business are notorious for trumpeting their achievements. Take another forum member, for instance: Harvey Gerst (sorry Harvey!)
http://www.digitaldarkness.com/view/page/Harvey+Gerst
Pretty impressive bio, no? Is Harvey a "Pro"? Definitely. Is he condescending to beginners? Never.
My reading comprehension is adequate, and when I read:
"ALL of it has to be pristine audio, though, we all work to the same standard, or we don't get paid, whioh means that you ain't workin'..."
I must assume that the 'you' refers to me personally. How else would one interpret that statement?
Regards,
Bob
That's Harvey's choice. There are more pros here then you may know about and not all willing to be known for their own reasons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251 |
Bob, (90db),
I’ve been trying to figure out why you’re trying to take Mac to task when he was simply offering advice on the topic at hand!
Puzzling to say the least. He wasn’t bragging about his accomplishments, … he was trying to help the OP.
He’s not going to submit his “resume” to YOU in order to justify offering advice to Kevin!
Jeez!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021 |
Quote:
Bob, (90db),
I’ve been trying to figure out why you’re trying to take Mac to task when he was simply offering advice on the topic at hand!
Puzzling to say the least. He wasn’t bragging about his accomplishments, … he was trying to help the OP.
He’s not going to submit his “resume” to YOU in order to justify offering advice to Kevin!
Jeez!!!
Yep.Well said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139 |
Pulling the wagons into a circle, are we?  I merely asked a question out of curiosity: "Mac, Where can I find some examples of mixes you have done? I looked here and at your site, but couldn't find any." To which I received a rather condescending reply. Simple.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815 |
Circle the wagons point them round and around the arrows are flying' tryin' to bring Mac down
He might have made a faux paux or maybe his audiominds is lost but what the hell -- he has over 30,000 posts!
we know Big Mac is true he only wants to help out he's a hero to BIAB and his words carry clout.
so circle the wagons point them round and around the arrows might be flying' but they won't bring Mac down
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Have a Happy and Blessed American Thanksgiving Holiday, ya'll!
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,632
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,632 |
90 dB This many people supporting Mac is not a "Pulling the wagons into a circle" response. You'd get the same response from many other forums and anybody that has dealt with him. Especially outside of the internet.
I thought about not saying anything and it didn't feel right. Mac is much respected and appreciated here. Harvey Gerst is respected here also, but I know Mac better than I know Harvey, and they are both way up there in my book.
/just my opinion
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,725
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,725 |
OK, if I had a wagon it might be in a circle but I too do not see that happening here as like many have stated what I read was also a "global" reference.
Now with that said if there is some bad blood here this might be another story all together, hopefully not for the forum. But for now I am commenting on what I thought was a global "you" reference.
Later,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,689
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,689 |
Quote:
Have a Happy and Blessed American Thanksgiving Holiday, ya'll!
You too, Mac.
Thanks much for all of your helpnd encouragement over the years.
Don S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
OK, back to the song.
Kevin - I just listened a couple times through and I think this track has plenty of 'sparkle'. Sounds danged good in my opinion from an EQ standpoint.
There's a fairly strong mixing element that seems strange to me - if you don't mind me pointing it out. I should mention that I am listening via in-ear monitors, playing your track against some Alan Jackson tracks as references - which is the best comparison CD I have to this style. I've listened specifically to these tracks: I Don't Need the Booze, Tropical Depression, and She's Got The Rhythm and I Got The Blues. I also listened to Rascal Flatts "What Hurts The Most", as I recall this one has some more widely panned BGVs - this one is more modern in it's heavy compression. Finally, I've got some Randy Travis and listened to "The Gift" and "Jerusalem's Cry" and "When Mama Prayed", which has some thick BGVs.
In your track the background harmony vocals are not in the 'background'. At several places, they are considerably louder than the main vocal - for example in the chorus after the first verse. In addition to the volume, the panning of the BGVs/harmony vox draws one's attention to the BGV's over the main vocal. The aah-ooh harmonies in verse 2 are also much louder than the main vocal. Again in the last chorus the harmonies are louder than the main vox/melody. I would cut them at least 6 dB for each side. I would also try to put them behind your main vocal, like what would happen on a sound stage. Listening to panning on most of those tracks, the BGVs are very often center panned. The exceptions in the list of songs I gave above are the Rascal Flatts song and "When Mama Prayed" by Randy Travis. When he is doing his own BGVs, they are heavily center panned, when other vocalists come in the panning is much wider. But in every case in every one of these songs, there is no doubt about the main vocal being quite a bit louder than the bgvs.
2. I can kind of understand the tympani roll to some extent, but it buries everything else in the mix when it comes in. What does it sound like when it's not in there?
So, I think if you are uncomfortable with this song, it's not the mastering/EQ, but more a mixing thing that might be what's concerning you. Try cranking those BGVs down (quite well done actually) quite a bit and center panning them in at least in some parts of the song for dynamics and attention to main vocal/melody.
I didn't see anyone else mention this aspect of the song, but I think it might be what is bothering you.
-Scott
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,779
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,779 |
Quote:
Quote:
Have a Happy and Blessed American Thanksgiving Holiday, ya'll!
You too, Mac.
Thanks much for all of your helpnd encouragement over the years.
Don S.
A BIG +1
Dad, how will I know when I've become an adult.
When your day is ruined because they rearranged the grocery store.
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815 |
Quote:
There's a fairly strong mixing element that seems strange to me - if you don't mind me pointing it out. ... In your track the background harmony vocals are not in the 'background'. At several places, they are considerably louder than the main vocal ... I would cut them at least 6 dB for each side. I would also try to put them behind your main vocal, like what would happen on a sound stage. Listening to panning on most of those (reference) tracks, the BGVs are very often center panned. ... But in every case in every one of these songs, there is no doubt about the main vocal being quite a bit louder than the bgvs.
I think that is quite a perceptive opinion. I have been listening to some youTube videos where the harmonies are often the same volume as the lead vocal (I can't remember a great example -- but the civil wars do that a lot). I can't say that I meant to do that here, but it sort of turned out that way (ha, ha). I also thought that the lead vocal was really getting drowned out in the last chorus, but I see you think it is everywhere. I will knock a few dB of of the BGV's and I was think of adding a doubled lead vocal line for the last chorus -- it needs more umpff. Also an interesting point on the panning of BGV's. I am thinking of leaving them panned wide here -- but I see no reason NOT to experiment on that item.
Quote:
2. I can kind of understand the tympani roll to some extent, but it buries everything else in the mix when it comes in. What does it sound like when it's not in there? -Scott
Someone mentioned that the key change section made the interlude a little long (even if it is a fairly short song). I tried to add that timpani roll and me on a conga (roland spd-20) to just add some "interest". I was going after that russ kunkle roll that he does on the Jackson Browne "for Everyman" album. I could cut it out, but I need to play with it some more before I give up on it. I should go back and listen to the russ kunkle roll and see what happens to all the other instruments while that is happening.
Thanks for the in-depth, considerate observations.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Kevin,
I was also listening over some very flat, highly isolating in-ear monitors, to both the reference songs I mentioned (don't know if there are YouTubes of them or not - and whether or not YouTube audio is trustworthy for reference is a topic for a different discussion) back to back with your track on SoundCloud. By using these in-ear monitors, it does indeed emphasize panning in one's head, compared to nearfield monitor or other stereo speaker listening. I did the comparisons with in-ear monitors very purposely however, as it doesn't matter if it's a home recording or a studio released recording, the panning highlights are there in both cases.
As to the EQ content and punch and so forth, I think your track sounds very polished as it is with great 'sparkle'. In fact, I would say it's right up in the top 5 or so RealBand assisted tracks I've heard posted by users over the years. I was not expecting that based on your typed description. I was ready for a dull, mono-centric track, with classic woofy vocals. Not the case at all.
I think you've done a great job with the vocals (my guess is that they are high-passed pretty aggressively) as they lack the hallmark low frequency muffle that so many home recorded tracks suffer from (some of mine included).
When I've helped folks mix and 'master' their projects, most of the time I spend effort with carving EQ for different tracks and more aggressively panning individual elements to give the tracks spatial and spectral dynamics. With this one, it is my opinion that you are very very close to being fully baked and ready to sell, with the exception of those harmony vox. I would be willing to send you a mashup of the BGV sections of the tracks that I have listed for references to you if you like. It will take me a little work, but I will do that. I'm not saying that these are outstanding examples of engineering, but they have similar vibe to your song. I don't have a huge modern country collection, but enough to do some comparative listening. I have just a few more in the stack of CDs that I would use for references; another is Lyle Lovett's Joshua Judges Ruth CD. That is an engineering Pièce de résistance, in my opinion. George Massenburg was the engineer. With high quality isolating headphones you can hear with more detail what the engineer was up to, than with typical monitors in a typical home studio. Not saying that those things are necessary for a good sounding playback on most systems, but they are very revealing.
-Scott
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,725
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,725 |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Have a Happy and Blessed American Thanksgiving Holiday, ya'll!
You too, Mac.
Thanks much for all of your helpnd encouragement over the years.
Don S.
A BIG +1
Put me on that pile!
And to all the rest of you forum rascals out there as well.
Later,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
So once we get past "sparkle", we moving on to "snap, crackle and pop"? (WAY too close to "shake, rattle and roll", btw....)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815 |
Quote:
...I would be willing to send you a mashup of the BGV sections of the tracks that I have listed for references to you if you like. It will take me a little work, but I will do that. I'm not saying that these are outstanding examples of engineering, but they have similar vibe to your song. I don't have a huge modern country collection, but enough to do some comparative listening. I have just a few more in the stack of CDs that I would use for references; another is Lyle Lovett's Joshua Judges Ruth CD. That is an engineering Pièce de résistance, in my opinion. George Massenburg was the engineer. With high quality isolating headphones you can hear with more detail what the engineer was up to, than with typical monitors in a typical home studio. Not saying that those things are necessary for a good sounding playback on most systems, but they are very revealing. ... -Scott
I have rhapsody, so I should be able to look up all those tunes you mentioned and check them out (they will be lower quality MP3 files, though (I am not sure of the bit rate). My current reference tracks, ripped from my CD collection (wav files) are:
Counting Crows: Sullivan Street, Mr. Jones, Anna Begins, Rain King (all from that first album -- I should get a couple from albums 2 and 3). Joni Mitchell: You Turn Me on I'm a Radio Ricky Skaggs and Bruce Hornsby: Hills of Mexico, Gulf of Mexico Fishing Boat Blues, Come on Out Natalie Merchant: Jealousy, Kind & Generous Jimmy Buffet: My Lovely Lady, Tin Cup Chalice Tracy Chapman: Crossroads, Freedom Now Nelly Furtado: One-Trick Pony, Powerless (Say What You Want) ... and a few others.
By the way, thanks for the kind words. I know I am going to struggle somewhat with vocal recording since I am using my $50 MXL V63M mic with my $20 Art Tube MP Studio preamp (both on sale!) in an untreated room, so it is nice to hear that it still sounds OK. I need to re-do some parts, so I never get the same positioning, so who knows if it will sound similar! Plus I plan then to go over all the vocal lines with melodyne essential. I am not worried about it being perfect, I just want to tighten up the notes that are too far out.
Kevin
Edit: yes, I use high pass filters on just about everything (until I start hearing any change and then I roll it back).
Last edited by Kemmrich; 11/21/12 09:37 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886 |
Good points.
I also took you as a "everyone type of you".
And Mac is condescending & arrogant at times, which is an atmosphere that is getting prevalent on this & other forums a lot these days...
We hope ya all have a great turkey day!
i5 3.20GHz, 32gb RAM, 1tb SSD OS, 12tb HDD, 4gb gForce vid card, 32" monitor, Audient id44, Win10 x64, BiaB/RB 2023, Reaper 6,IK Multimedia Total Studio 3.5 MAX, Waves 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holiday Weekend Hours
It's Victoria Day Long Weekend in Canada. Our Customer Service hours are:
Saturday, May 16: Closed
Sunday, May 17: Closed
Monday, May 18: 8:00am - 4:00pm
Regular hours resume Tuesday, May 19th!
Today's the Last Day of the Band-in-a-Box 2026® for Mac Special!
Order before 11:59pm PDT today (May 15, 2026) to save up to 50% off your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® upgrade and receive a FREE Bonus PAK loaded with great new Add-ons to use with this new version!
Don't wait - order today!
Check out all the new features in the redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac - Special Offers End at 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th, 2026!
Order before 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th and SAVE up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® version 2026 for Mac Upgrade packages... and that's not all! With your version 2026 for Mac purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks... that's 222 NEW RealTracks available with version Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac!
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® today for as little as $49! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all available purchase options.
Learn more about the Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK here.
If you have any questions about which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We're here to help!
202 New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2026!
With Band-in-a-Box® 2026, we've released 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 468-488) in a variety of genres—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Funk & World (Sets 468-475):
Our new jazz, funk & blues RealTracks include a groovin’ collection of RealTracks and RealDrums! These include more requested “soul jazz” RealTracks featuring artists Neil Swainson (bass), Charles Treadway (organ), Brent Mason (guitar), and Wes Little (drums). There are new “smooth jazz” styles (4), which include a RealTracks first: muted trumpet, as well as slick new smooth jazz brushes options for drums. Blues lovers will be thrilled—there are more “classic acoustic blues” styles, including guitar (5), bass (4), and drums (10) with blues master Colin Linden, featuring understated and tasty background acoustic soloing, plus brushes drums and acoustic bass. There are also new electric blues RealTracks, including electric blues with PG favorite Johnny Hiland (3) and soulful electric slide guitar from Colin Linden (4). If you love funk & gospel, there are great new options this year, including gospel organ (3) from Charles Treadway, as well as new funk, tango, and rock ’n’ roll drums (3) and bass (1). And for big, bold arrangements, we have uptempo soul horns (4) featuring a three-part hip horn section with options for a full mix or stems of each individual horn — plus an accompanying rhythm section (4) of drums, bass, guitar, and electric piano!
Rock & Pop (Sets 476–482):
Our new rock & pop RealTracks bring a powerful mix of requested favorites, fresh genres, and modern chart-inspired styles! We have more of our popular “Producer Layered Acoustic Guitars (15)” featuring Band-in-a-Box favorite Brent Mason. We’ve continued our much-requested disco styles (10), and added new Celtic guitar (5) with a more basic, accessible approach than our previous Drop-D or DADGAD offerings. There are also highly requested yacht rock styles (17), inspired by the smooth, polished soft-rock sound of the late ’70s and early ’80s — laid-back grooves, silky electric pianos, warm textures, elegant harmonic movement, and pristine production aesthetics. Fans of heavier styles will love our new glam metal (13), capturing the flashy, high-energy sound of ’80s arena-ready guitar rock. We also have a set of rootsy modern-folk rock (18), with a warm, organic sound combining contemporary folk textures and driving acoustic strumming. And we’ve added lots of new modern pop styles (16) — the kinds of sounds you’re hearing on the radio today, featuring exciting new drums, synths, and cutting-edge RealTracks arrangements.
Country, & Americana (Sets 483–488):
Our new country & Americana RealTracks deliver a rich collection of acoustic, electric, and roots-inspired styles! We have new country pop (9) with legendary guitarist Brent Mason. There is also a potpourri (14) of bouzouki, guitars, banjo, and more, perfect for adding texture and character to contemporary acoustic arrangements. We’ve added funky country guitar (5) with PG favorite Brent Mason, along with classic pedal steel styles (5) featuring steel great Doug Jernigan. There are more country songwriter styles (8) that provide intimate, rootsy foundations for storytelling and modern Americana writing. Finally, we have “background soloing” acoustic guitar (12) with Brent Mason — simpler, but still very tasty acoustic lines designed to sit beautifully behind vocals or act as a subtle standalone solo part.
Check out all the 202 new RealTracks (in sets 468-488)!
And, if you are looking for more, the 2026 49-PAK (for $49) includes an impressive collection of 20 bonus RealTracks, featuring exciting and inspiring additions to add to your RealTracks library. You'll get new country-rhythm guitar styles from PG Music favorites Johnny Hiland and Brent Mason, along with modern-pop grooves that capture today’s radio-ready sound! There are also new indie-folk styles with guitar, bass, 6-string bass used as a high-chording instrument, acoustic guitar, and banjo. Plus, dedicated "cymbal fills" RealDrums provide an added layer that work very well with low-key folky styles with other percussion.
The 2026 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2026 49-PAK!
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
With your version 2026 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- iOS Android Band-in-a-Box® App
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,311
Posts803,206
Members40,093
| |
Most Online64,515 Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|