Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Off-Topic
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 178
L
lingyai Offline OP
Apprentice
OP Offline
Apprentice
L
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 178

Hi all,

This is pretty close to done but I'd still welcome any constructive comments about how the mix / arrangement might be improved. (BIAB was not used).

https://soundcloud.com/st-josephs-social-club/hello-in-there-john-prine-cover-draft-13-sept-2016

If you comment, please mention what you listened to it on (e.g. cans, monitors, phone speaker etc)

Also note that the underlying WAV file, which is closest to what I'd intended, is downloadable from Soundcloud.

(Finally, sorry, but the totally random track which SoundCloud plays after this has nothing to do with me. Anyone know how to prevent this?)

Off-Topic
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,851
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,851
Man, John Prine is such a good writer. I used to play live and had a few JP songs in my song list. They always played well with the audience.

I'm listening on speakers.

The vox are boxy and dry. Nicely done but also could use some pitch correction in a few places. It sounds like you are a bit too close to the mic. No breathing room.

Guitar and instruments sound good. That steel is really sweet, as is the guitar.

For such a song, the bare bones approach you took works well. I like the pause at 1:53. Nice. The second time... not so much. Do it once for effect.

Are you aware that to post a cover tune here, you need to have licensed the rights and post the license number in your OP. Not my rules, but the rules of PG.

So good that I listened twice.... love the bare bones aspect. Fix the vocals and you got a good tune.


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Off-Topic
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 178
L
lingyai Offline OP
Apprentice
OP Offline
Apprentice
L
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 178
Thanks for the listening, and for the feedback.

May I ask,

-- which words did you hear which have pitch problems?

-- I'm not sure I understand the protocol here -- there is also a post here with a (very nice) cover of 500 Miles, which no one cited for any breach ... in fact you chimed in with some praise, but no censure... What's the deal?

Off-Topic
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,851
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,851
Yes, there was another user who posted a link to a Facebook posting of a totally different user. The posting party should have known better. The singer had little control over someone else linking to her cover posted on line. PG staff should have addressed that post for it's obvious copyright violation. Again, it's their rules, not mine. I do tend to point out cover/copyright to folks who are new or rarely come in here just so they are aware of the rules for future reference.

We do have at least one user here who records covers and does do it the correct way, getting the license and posting that information in his posts.

I commented on that cover post but my comments were sidebar at best and nothing related to the performance.

Perhaps now that PG staff are visiting the forums they can enforce the rules they made.

Anyway, I didn't intend to come off sounding like a forum cop.... it was intended to be a friendly FYI.

On to other things now.....


Pitch issues: Start at 1:24 thru 1:36 and again at 3:20 when this same part repeats. These pitch issues are not huge.... but subtle and there's also an "unsure quaver" in the held notes. Different from a natural vibrato. With Melodyne it's a quick, transparent fix for both issues. I mentioned the pitch issues only because this song is an otherwise flawless performance once you get the EQ and reverb issues on the vox resolved.

Even though it's a cover, I'd love to hear this with the vox track fixed.


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Off-Topic
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
“I'm not sure I understand the protocol here....”


The protocol here is the same as everywhere else in the civilized world. You cannot record/perform/publish copyrighted material without a license to do so.

PG's forum rule is superfluous.

Prine is with BMI, by the way, in case you'd like to pay him. wink


Regards,

Bob

Off-Topic
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 178
L
lingyai Offline OP
Apprentice
OP Offline
Apprentice
L
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 178
Hi, 90 db,

Sir, there's no need to be nasty after the question has already been answered, with respect it adds nothing.

I think I made it quite clear I was only asking why a link to a cover version on social media of 500 miles seemed ok here, while a link to a cover on social media of Hello In There didn't. Fair question in all, which Guitarhacker was kind enough to explain.

Seeing covers all over the internet, and 500 Miles here, made me think it was ok to post a cover here. Fair enough, live and learn.

Perhaps for consistency's sake you might want to post your views on the subject on other threads here featuring covers.


Last edited by lingyai; 09/16/16 07:12 AM.
Off-Topic
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Originally Posted By: lingyai
Hi, 90 db,

Sir, there's no need to be nasty after the question has already been answered, with respect it adds nothing.

I think I made it quite clear I was only asking why a link to a cover version on social media of 500 miles seemed ok here, while a link to a cover on social media of Hello In There didn't. Fair question in all, which Guitarhacker was kind enough to explain.

Seeing covers all over the internet, and 500 Miles here, made me think it was ok to post a cover here. Fair enough, live and learn.

Perhaps for consistency's sake you might want to post your views on the subject on other threads here featuring covers.







My comments weren't meant to be nasty. Sorry if they came off that way. I can be rather direct. grin

If you recall, I actually helped you cover another song on this thread:

http://www.pgmusic.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Main=52259&Number=362425#Post362425


As Herb said, that other song should not have been posted either without compensating Hedy West, the composer.


“Perhaps for consistency's sake you might want to post your views on the subject on other threads here featuring covers.”


Now, that sounds a bit nasty. grin



Regards,

Bob

Off-Topic
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,166
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,166
Am I right in thinking that Youtube has a way around any songs cover violation by having an ad at start of song, and then usually don't take the cover down.....or is this a total figment of my imagination?

Maybe the way to go, as the fella says if no money involved, highly unlikely anyone is going to sue you.

Musiclover


Musiclover

My music https://www.youtube.com/user/donegalprideofall

Windows 10 (64bit) M-Audio Fast Track Pro, Band in a Box 2025, Cubase 14, Cakewalk and far too many VST plugins that I probably don't need or will ever use smile
Off-Topic
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,550
Veteran
Online Happy
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,550
YouTube has several options. They think what they are doing is in compliance with copyright.


BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Presonus Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Off-Topic
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,898
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,898
Originally Posted By: Matt Finley
YouTube has several options. They think what they are doing is in compliance with copyright.

Not sure what they think! smile But they realized that monetizing content rather than removing it is usually preferred by all parties involved!

Off-Topic
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,898
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,898
Originally Posted By: musiclover
Am I right in thinking that Youtube has a way around any songs cover violation by having an ad at start of song, and then usually don't take the cover down.....or is this a total figment of my imagination?

Maybe the way to go, as the fella says if no money involved, highly unlikely anyone is going to sue you.

Musiclover

they allow folks to post. if a take-down request comes in they will honor it. they also use automated systems that "watch" every video and tag it if it is suspect. and they then monetize the video with ads and share the revenue with the owner. they used to be very aggressive with folks who posted copyrighted content; you would get something like three complaints and they would disable your channel and delete all your videos. I think these days they either monetize or block without disabling your account.

it is all about the money (always has been!)

Off-Topic
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 178
L
lingyai Offline OP
Apprentice
OP Offline
Apprentice
L
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 178
Originally Posted By: 90 dB


“Perhaps for consistency's sake you might want to post your views on the subject on other threads here featuring covers.”


Now, that sounds a bit nasty. grin




Sir, I posted here to hear views on a mix of a cover, and have in the process learned that is against the rules, which I will abide by. I did not wish for a discussion about anything else.

But there is nothing nasty about saying that rules should be the same for everyone; and by "rules" I include their "enforcement" via posts, like Guitarhacker's friendly nudge, as well as your your post (I reckon there are different flavours of directness).

I just wonder, if you feel so strongly about this issue to post as you did here, why not also in the 500 Miles thread? That thread was, to me, a green light to post mine. Only now I'm scatching my head as to why only I get the traffic ticket.

I'd just as soon have this thread continue like that one, that is, with comments on the song. Or at least to not go further off topic.

Off-Topic
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
"Sir, I posted here to hear views on a mix of a cover, and have in the process learned that is against the rules, which I will abide by."


And yet, your cover of a copyrighted song still appears in this thread, contrary to the rules. grin



Priceless. grin

Off-Topic
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,697
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,697
Guys, give it a rest ok?

Herb just started a thread complimenting PG on how active the staff has become on the forums lately and we all chimed in agreeing how cool it is and how great a company PG is for doing that.

I can't keep up with copyright stuff any more, How YT does it, how Soundcloud does it, all of it. I just don't give a damn. I used to but not now. Whatever the so called rules are they seem to be very arbitrary to me. Soundcloud itself is supposed to have very sophisticated 'bots that can detect verboten material just from analyzing the audio file. If they do I've seen zero evidence of it. I have copywritten stuff up there and it's been up for years now. I've tried to be cute and not put the correct song title up, just things like Wavetest 1 and stuff like that but I don't think even that matters.

About the only thing I understand about YT for example is if the rights owner complains they will remove it, otherwise they stay up. Out of my very extensive YT bookmarks a very small number have been removed at the request of the owner. It seems like the vast majority of artists don't seem to mind and I mean legendary names too.

If there's a problem let the forum mods handle it I see NO NEED for any of us to keep bringing it up. Just post whatever you want and see what happens. If they take it down, then they take it down.

To the OP, I like your version of this. Sure the vocals are not perfect but what folk songs are? Uhhh, none of them? Anybody really think Dylan is some great singer? Folk singers don't try to be Striesand or Sinatra. It's never been their thing to be great vocalists. Folk is all about the feeling and the words. Personally I think this is a pretty good first draft so Lingyai keep it up.

Bob


Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.
Off-Topic
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,936
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,936
Hi lingyai. I think your interpretation of this song is just lovely. Your treatment of it is so gentle. I don't hear any problems with the vocal.

I love this John Prine song and also perform it live quite a bit. (I have a biab backing track. Pm me if you would like me to send it to you. It is a little more up tempo than your version).

I think on the whole "cover" thing, the "safest" place to upload covers online is YouTube because of the content id system they have. The copyright owners can elect to have the content taken down or they can elect to monetize it. Most of the copyright owners elect to monetize. But still, the worst that can happen is you can get an email asking you to remove the video. To post the song on YouTube you don't need to make a video, you can just use a still picture or graphic.

So my view is, go for it, there really is not much to loose and many many careers have been launched by posting cover tunes on YouTube.

Last edited by JoanneCooper; 09/17/16 07:30 PM.

LyricLab – Where words become music https://www.lyriclab.net/
Off-Topic
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,851
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,851
Does that mean the forum rules are now officially "Out the Window" and all that mumbo-jumbo about copyright no longer applies to anything?

Last edited by Guitarhacker; 09/18/16 03:38 AM.

You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Off-Topic
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,936
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 2,936
Originally Posted By: Guitarhacker
Does that mean the forum rules are now officially "Out the Window" and all that mumbo-jumbo about copyright no longer applies to anything?

not saying that at all. Just trying to say that posting on Youtube is probably the "best" (only?) place to post covers. You will notice I did not say anything about posting to this forum.


LyricLab – Where words become music https://www.lyriclab.net/
Off-Topic
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,851
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,851
Well if YouTube has monetized the music.... and the artist is satisfied with that and is apparently being compensated financially......

What's the problem with posting covers that are posted on YouTube? It would appear to be "just as good" as having the license and posting the song on some other server site. No?


You can find my music at:
www.herbhartley.com
Add nothing that adds nothing to the music.
You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.

The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Holiday Weekend Hours

As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:

April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours

Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!

— Team PG

Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!

If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!

If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!

Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.

PowerTracks Pro 2026 for Windows is Here!

PowerTracks 2026 is here—bringing powerful new enhancements designed to make your production workflow faster, smoother, and more intuitive than ever.

The enhanced Mixer now shows Track Type and Instrument icons for instant track recognition, while a new grid option simplifies editing views. Non-floating windows adopt a modern title bar style, replacing the legacy blue bar.

The Master Volume is now applied at the end of the audio chain for consistent levels and full-signal master effects.

Tablature now includes a “Save bends when saving XML” option for improved compatibility with PG Music tools. Plus, you can instantly match all track heights with a simple Ctrl-release after resizing, and Add2 chords from MGU/SGU files are now fully supported... and more!

Get started today—first-time packages start at just $49.

Already using PowerTracks Pro Audio? Upgrade for as little as $29 and enjoy the latest improvements!

Order now!

Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!

Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!

We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!

Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.

Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.

There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!

Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!

Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.

If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!

Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!

We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!

There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.

When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.

Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.

Forum Statistics
Forums57
Topics86,040
Posts800,649
Members40,053
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
Newest Members
JamaicaBob, csgul, mamad, carl schwindeman, Palgreen 1
40,053 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 131
DC Ron 115
rsdean 93
Noel96 60
Today's Birthdays
90 dB, jestlykme, Joop Witteman
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5