|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Welcome to my world.
I hear stuff like that -- and much worse -- all the time.
Funny thing is, if I mention one of 'em on a forum, it almost always draws flames from some fan or other...
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 64
Enthusiast
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 64 |
What's really crazy is that these are certainly "nit picky" things to point out, but probably largely spot on. Yet when we try to (helpfully) critique one another on production values, or song writing we often find some very thin skin. Let's use these forums to spur one another on to greatness.
Thanks for the post. Those were very interesting and entertaining.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,061
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,061 |
I believe there should be a tolerable level of disfunction in both my spelling and all the other stuff we try to create. Those examples were interesting but look at some of the live performances like "Woodstock" that are raw, gritty and great. Half the musicians were stoned, the sound was mediocre at times but the event was greater than studio perfection could attain. There is no excuse for sloppy studio work but when I saw Janis Joplin in concert there was an energy that few can translate into the studio track. Who hasn't heard a recording of "Lead Belly" or other early portable recordings of Blues artist, that enjoyed the background noise and crackle as much as the music. If the Mason Willam's "Classical Gas" was released with a flub, that would be inexcusable, because we expect near perfection in that piece. Just a different POV from a wannabe that can't play a radio, but it all gooood. Wyndham
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 996
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 996 |
In the truly excellent BBC radio series, the Record Producers, Steve Levine explained how that bizarre skip on Blondie's Heart of Glass (we're so used to it now that we don't even notice it) was the result of Mike Chapman having cut off too much tape during an edit. He had made the basic error of using the original and did not have a copy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Wyndham, I don't disagree with you for the live stuff - but studio blunders like these are inexcusable - particularly the comped in crappy sounding middle section in that John Lennon bit.
-Scott
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Quote:
He had made the basic error of using the original and did not have a copy.
That's not an error when you are dealing with analog magnetic tape, my friend.
You see, there really can be only one copy, because to copy analog tape you lose too much in the generational transition.
Yes, "back in the day" the engineer with the marking crayon, razor blade and the splicing tape really only got but one shot at it to get it right.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,600
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,600 |
Great Point
If you even dubbed to another track for doubling effect you had a heck of a time restoring the second track to match the first. A 'backup copy' didn't exist back then. Many many recordings will live only on vinyl, since tape losoes so much quality not only when duped, but also over time. Magentics fade, air eats away at the tapes, oxidation, etc.
We have it SO much better now in the digital age, I think a lot of us take that for granted! Not meaning to start the age old analog/digital debate. Just sayin' that digital gives us so much more safety.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Lots of Master Tapes are still stored away safe in the underground climate controlled vaults, though.
What's becoming unobtanium are THE MACHINES.
Whenever there's a project to resurrect an old Master for digital reprocessing, the call goes out for the few who have maintained certain old pieces of equipment just waiting for the moment. It will surely cost more and more to do it that way as time goes by, too.
There's another problem there also IMO.
A lot of "digitally remastered" stuff is crap. Run it through the Sony automated mastering software and call it a good job. Poo.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 484
Journeyman
|
Journeyman
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 484 |
Interesting. I do have a defense for those recordings of the audio tape less than 16 track recorder days. I don't think the technology then caught much of these nuances. Case in pont, I remember someone playing Green Onions to me just when CDs came out. He swore that you could hear the drummer dropping a stick during the song.
Another thing you have to consider is the amount of hours spent on recording. I recalled how by the time the recording was "satisfactory" I already hated the song and dreaded the thought of having to play it again. I commend those musicians who endured the hours of writing, practicing, recording and then turn around and faced with having the hell of the audience demand you perform it for the next 40 years of your life!!! That took out Ricky Nelson.
The concern I had when we got into all this digital design was the fact that people would become overly critical of the final sound forgetting that it was crafted by humans that by default means there will be flaws. Taking those subtle flaws out and you have removed the human touch. The greater irony is if you open a musicians gear catelog and all you see are digitally processed "analog" effects for that human feel. Too funny. Then I think about Real Band. If I wanted audio perfection I would have stayed with MIDI; every note is cut to its precise position. I love Real Band... flaws and all!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
PowerTracks Pro 2026 for Windows is Here!
PowerTracks 2026 is here—bringing powerful new enhancements designed to make your production workflow faster, smoother, and more intuitive than ever.
The enhanced Mixer now shows Track Type and Instrument icons for instant track recognition, while a new grid option simplifies editing views. Non-floating windows adopt a modern title bar style, replacing the legacy blue bar.
The Master Volume is now applied at the end of the audio chain for consistent levels and full-signal master effects.
Tablature now includes a “Save bends when saving XML” option for improved compatibility with PG Music tools. Plus, you can instantly match all track heights with a simple Ctrl-release after resizing, and Add2 chords from MGU/SGU files are now fully supported... and more!
Get started today—first-time packages start at just $49.
Already using PowerTracks Pro Audio? Upgrade for as little as $29 and enjoy the latest improvements!
Order now!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,184
Posts801,712
Members40,062
| |
Most Online64,515 Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|