|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886
Expert
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886 |
There is a lot of folks who say that they can tell the difference between DAW's because of their sound, and there are those that say there is no difference...the endless debate....so here is what I propose....
Lets take 3 or 4 pieces of recorded music, ripped straight from CD's. Place the tracks in as many DAW's as possible, from Kristal to ProTools, Windows-Mac-Linux, etc & render them down to your standard 44.1/16bit .wav files.
I suggest an orchestral classical piece, and good old R&R piece, an acoustic piece like fingerstyle guitar or piano, and a dance-rap-hiphop piece. They would only have to be say, what, 1 or 2 min long snips each, right?
So what do you folks say, would this work? If I'm wrong, then I'm wrong, but I feel that a lot of folks will be able to tell a difference between the files.
The rules?
The ones creating the files agree to run them thru an OUT OF THE BOX SETUP! No tweaks, no adjustments, just the DAW software as it originally sets itself up. Try to match the volume of each manually so the levels stay consistent, no software help. And none of this run it thru the same software 4 times and say that it is different DAW's. Lets keep it up & up.
The listeners agree to use NO type of metering, spectrum analyzers, etc, just using their ears on whatever monitoring they feel comfortable with. They also agree to do the listening test alone, no sharing thoughts, or pooling notes, on the tracks with others.
And EVERYONE agrees that this is a fun test, and will keep it in this spirit, since there will be folks from both sides that will find fault with any result!
What say ye?
=====
This has been posted on the following forums..
TTM
Kristal
Reaper
PG Music
Gearslutz
Please feel free to post it on any others that you feel would like to join the fun!
i5 3.20GHz, 32gb RAM, 1tb SSD OS, 12tb HDD, 4gb gForce vid card, 32" monitor, Audient id44, Win10 x64, BiaB/RB 2023, Reaper 6,IK Multimedia Total Studio 3.5 MAX, Waves 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,516
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,516 |
I think I must be missing something here. You propose to take a signal that is on a CD, so it is CD quality, 44.1/16 bit, rip it, and immediately render it to the same quality signal? This is not "down", it's the same. I would not expect to hear any difference. If there were any difference, it would only be a test of the CD ripping and CD burning algorithms.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Presonus Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886 |
No, what I am saying is that after it is run thru the various DAW software AS-IS, and then rendered down from that software, we try to see if there is a difference or not...
I also welcome any other ways to test this idea out....
i5 3.20GHz, 32gb RAM, 1tb SSD OS, 12tb HDD, 4gb gForce vid card, 32" monitor, Audient id44, Win10 x64, BiaB/RB 2023, Reaper 6,IK Multimedia Total Studio 3.5 MAX, Waves 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 85
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886 |
i5 3.20GHz, 32gb RAM, 1tb SSD OS, 12tb HDD, 4gb gForce vid card, 32" monitor, Audient id44, Win10 x64, BiaB/RB 2023, Reaper 6,IK Multimedia Total Studio 3.5 MAX, Waves 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,558
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,558 |
 But how can that possibly be?? This one says 'professional' on it, and that one doesn't !? And it cost 5 times as much! It MUST be better.  Mac has said it a hunnerd times
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,516
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,516 |
Quote:
No, what I am saying is that after it is run thru the various DAW software AS-IS, and then rendered down from that software, we try to see if there is a difference or not...
I'm not sure there is such a thing as "as-is". You should set certain things when you begin to record with DAW software. Global recording bit-rate is one of them.
In the cockos link, note that this is not the same as you proposed, since they introduced 24-bit. Even then, no significant difference.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Presonus Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
This ain't gonna be able to prove anything either way.
Gain Staging alone is gonna kill it.
Then there are other factors. Ripping software? Are all Rippers created equal? Doubtful. Soundcard jitter alone can account for what a lot of people may be mistaking for the "sound" of a DAW software, too.
And then, the only criteria for selection would be a subjective evaluation?
This is not a test.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333 |
Sounds like the War of the Worlds..."This IS NOT a TEST.
Wow! Aliens have landed.
John Conley
Musica est vita
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
I've read this debate ad infinitum - has nearly zero basis in reality - the reality being that we all have different playback equipment, and likely have at most 3 DAW softwares.
There is debate over how many bits are used internally to the DAW, etc. but unless one is listening in a pristine environment on killer monitoring equipment, the likelihood of hearing differences due to the engine inside the DAW software is incredibly small.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,731
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,731 |
Also the accuracy of the meters and faders in the DAw are not going to be 100% the same. The summing at the master channel strip different. You add the same tracks to three different DAWs ( I have done this several times) and you can never get the settings and path exactly the same resulting in a slightly different end result. If you are only using Audio then that is one thing, but introduce midi and softsynth to the equation and it all goes out the window. I did a test a few years back with three DAWs. MTS, Cakewalk MC and N-Track, using the same midi file, with as close as possible settings and as far as possible the same synths, and i got very different results. One main reason is that every DAW uses Synths a little bit different, and handles the routing differently. Over all the end result was that they all did a decent job and it came down to which one i could work with the easiest, and which one gave me the least resistance to completing a project in a timely manner.
The reason mention this is to point out that to me this is a dead debate, since we each have a certain way of working with our projects and so much comes into play. The type of media in the project, i.e. midi, audio. synths, loops, whatever. The desired effects, and the process to get to the end result are all subjective. For me the process has matured to the point i have gotten into a flow using three DAW programs all for different reasons. I use BiaB for song bed design, because i can go from concept to basic song structure in a short time. RB for Live backing track development after BiaB has had it's way with some of them, and for all work with .kar, and midi files as i can develop a very nice end result processing the midi and adding RTs for realism. MTS for final tracking and mix down of any original tune work that comes from BiaB design, since it has simple basic mastering abilities, due to it's master strip design, that I have not found in any other software.
I have tried other DAWs as well. I loved the REAPER routing capabilities, but on my system it struggled with stability, and i tired of the constant setup required to add in synths and stuff i could do in seconds with MTS. I used Cakewalk stuff early on, but unless i bite the bullet and buy Sonar (way to much money) i don't get all the bells and whistles, and even then cake seems to me to have a buggy way about it.
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB/RB 2026, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 11 , Presonus Audiobox USB96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,558
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,558 |
In the mixer window of RB is a final output slot that can be used as a master FX slot.
Not sure if this is anywhere near comparable to MTS, but thought I would point it out.
It is labeled A1, at bottom right of mixer screen in default view.
This is where any master limiters, meters, compressors, analyzers, etc can be used on the final mix.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,731
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,731 |
Yes I have started using that, and it will work fine, but still IMHO MTS has a superior signal chain for pure tracking. This is in part due to the caliber of the effects included, and also due in part to the way it handles synths and effects in both audio and midi tracks. I guess the biggest draw for me is the rock solid stable system it has. In any one release there are never more than 2 patches, and usually only 1. And usually that patch is just a very small issue, so with or without the patch it is stable.
None of this in anyway deminishes RB, or BiaB, as they are different animals, and do things MTS does not even attempt. I could not get by without BiaB, and or RB now. I could get by without MTS. BUT the truth be told I chose not to as for the price i think it is the best basic DAW on the market, and it has simplified and enhanced the process for me in ways it is hard to decribe. When mac first suggested it to me i was struggling to get things done. I was bouncing around between N-Tracks, and Cake MC2003. I had tried Tracktion, REAPER, Vegas, Acid, And even a demo of PTPA. Everything i tried streesed out on my system, and had some glaring weakness. I bought and downloaded MTS on a suggestion from mac, and not only did it download smoothly, but it opened up and the setup was 5 minutes, and in the next hour i had recorded, mixed, and mastered a song. I would then go on to record and finish about 10 songs in a row with no issues at all. I even tried to bounce back and use some of the other programs, but they would slow me down and cause issues that delayed and frustrated me.
I have helped out at cakewalk since 2004 and it has always frustrated me that almost every issue that newbies have would have been solved with the purchase of MTS. So MTS, BiaB,and RB are my only used DAW software programs now. I still have several others but they are just there.
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB/RB 2026, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 11 , Presonus Audiobox USB96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,558
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,558 |
Interesting, thanks for the review. I haven't tinkered with MTS in years.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 809
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 809 |
MTS please explain what it is and where to find it.
Last edited by edbulmer; 01/23/10 05:59 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
PowerTracks Pro 2026 for Windows is Here!
PowerTracks 2026 is here—bringing powerful new enhancements designed to make your production workflow faster, smoother, and more intuitive than ever.
The enhanced Mixer now shows Track Type and Instrument icons for instant track recognition, while a new grid option simplifies editing views. Non-floating windows adopt a modern title bar style, replacing the legacy blue bar.
The Master Volume is now applied at the end of the audio chain for consistent levels and full-signal master effects.
Tablature now includes a “Save bends when saving XML” option for improved compatibility with PG Music tools. Plus, you can instantly match all track heights with a simple Ctrl-release after resizing, and Add2 chords from MGU/SGU files are now fully supported... and more!
Get started today—first-time packages start at just $49.
Already using PowerTracks Pro Audio? Upgrade for as little as $29 and enjoy the latest improvements!
Order now!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!
Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!
We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.
Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!
Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.
If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!
Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!
We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
Happy New Year!
Thank you for being part of the Band-in-a-Box® community.
Wishing you and yours a very happy 2026—Happy New Year from all of us at PG Music!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,092
Posts800,120
Members40,033
| |
Most Online44,367
Mar 4th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean