|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 188
Apprentice
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 188 |
How does this compare to the Ketron SD2?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,697
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,697 |
Not even close imho. The TTS-1 is slightly better than the VSC and sounds like it came from the same soundset to me. It has that's 80's Roland sound but compressed. It does give you a lot of control over individual patch parameters.
This is completely subjective though, some have posted they like it a lot, depends on the style of music. I like jazz and good acoustic sounds so I favor realistic sounding synths as opposed to electronic sounding ones so actual instruments like pianos, basses, horns, guitars etc are way better on the Ketron or my Sonic Cell. A lot of it has to do with sampling technology, the VSC and TTS-1 have got to be 10-12 years old now, maybe older and highly compressed for use on computers that had 128mb of ram at the time.
Bob
Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 85
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 85 |
After some more extensive A/B comparison of the TTS-1 and the ForteDXi, through some decent monitors this time, I think the ForteDXi has some better raw sounds, but I really like the ability to get in and tweak the TTS-1 sounds more to my liking.
I also think that either one is worth the $40 price of admission, although having the TTS-1 bundled with Music Creator 5 for that price means that my kid gets a user-friendly DAW-lite as part of that $40 bargain.
Of course, none of this addresses your question. But I would imagine that neither of these soft solutions really compare in sound quality to the Keytron, and the people here that have one do seem to love it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 85
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 85 |
BTW, that SonicCell looks like a really nice piece of gear.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 812
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 812 |
Hi,
Well, although I do use the TTS-1 as my BIAB softsynth, I would never use it in the final mix, this is where high quality VSTi's come in. I think the major advantage of a softsynth is that you can take your laptop to the park and work on some tunes without having to lug a module with you (and the audio cables and power supply!)
Every demo I've heard of the Ketron SD2 sounds good. If you are working with a desktop computer, or aren't concerned about being mobile, I would use it. It's about the size of a cheeze sandwich. If it were buss powered, I think they would sell a million of them!
The big plus for the TTS-1 is that it is now bundled with Music Creator 5, from Cakewalk, which you can get for $35, which means you can have a quality sequencer with great sounds for next to nothing.
Ed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 85
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 85 |
Exactly. This is why I currently don't have much interest in a Keytron, because with a decent enough GM soft synth/sampler, I can prototype songs at the coffee shop on my netbook, then later, transfer the MIDI to my DAW, where I have all sorts of high-quality sampler and synth options available.
But I would imagine that if you don't have a lot of soft sampler and synth options, and/or the horsepower of your machine won't support a bunch of these, then a Keytron would be a good choice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
The Ketron SD-2 simply blows it out of the water.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 812
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 812 |
I'm sure Mac is correct, I have been impressed with the demos I have heard. If you do want to go the Softsynth route, and don't mind spending a bit more, there is a company called Vir2, they make a GM softsynth called "One". Although it's $199, it sounds amazing. I think there are some demos on Youtube.
Ed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 88
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 88 |
The TTS-1 is Cakewalk by Roland's version of the Roland Hypercanvas HQ. I paid around $120 (can't remember for sure) for the Hypercanvas a few years back, but it demands you re-insert the disk for verification at random times, which is unacceptable for live use. Then Cake started including TTS-1, which doesn't have that problem. It sounds much better than the ancient VSC, and is pretty light on CPU, so I have it on my laptop in case my SD2 goes down.
The SD2 really is a nice sounding GM module. It sounds fuller and more realistic than my Roland XV-2020. Based on SonicCell demos I've heard, the SD2 beats that too. Plus, it's so nice and small!
The other GM softsynth one might consider is Native Instruments Bandstand. It's discontinued, and not reliable for live use (in my experience), but for rendering at home it beats the VSC and TTS-1 (but not by much). But, if you want good, easy sound, get the Ketron.
It's a shame Yamaha isn't making a GM module any more. I've always like their sounds better than Roland.
===========================
Ed Buckley,
I don't think the VI.ONE is a GM module. It is a sampler library, with, no doubt, some great sounds. But, from what I see on their site, you can't simply send a MIDI file to it and use it as a player. You would have to manually choose the instruments for each channel. That puts it in the same class as other high quality samplers, like Kontact (which is the underlying engine for VI.ONE), SampleTank, Dimension, etc. Great sounds, but not very handy for running MIDI tracks live.
Dave Burns
Lowell, MA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 85
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 85 |
I picked up VI.ONE from Guitar Center today for $99. I'm installing it as I type, and looking forward to giving it a spin.
At that price, it was almost an impulse buy.
Also, according to someone else on this forum who tried it out successfully with BiaB, there is a multi "GM" module in Vi One.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134 |
Two higher end soft synth 'work stations' with full GM compatibility worth taking a look at are Steinberg's Hypersonic 2 and Luxonix' Purity. Certainly not saying they'd surpass the Ketron, but they are far ahead of the other GM soft synths mentioned here.
I'm intrigued with the Ketron and listened to Mac's excellent Steely Dan arrangement on the web page (you're reelin' in the years, dude!).
But, decided for now to pull my old Roland JV-1010 out of the closet, since it has full GM soundset and except for low gain and a slightly reduced quality, runs off the porch with the other Roland synths of its era.
Just happen to have that Sampleheads 'Country Collection' JV80 ROM card for those resonator guitars and twin texas fiddles. Think I'll pop the card in the JV-1010 tonight and see what kind of twang I can get out of it. I'd love to have a chance to try the Ketron head to head with it.
I sort of wish they made a Ketron 3 ... with the extra connectivity of the 4, but with just the one sound chip. I'm allergic to RCA jacks, but I can't really see paying the extra cost of the second sound chip.
Prado
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
The SD-4 still has Audio Outs, that must be connected to the soundcard or mixer, they are 1/4" jacks.
The USB connectivbity is only a MIDI connect. It can also be used as a MIDI-to-USB for your keyboard or other controller to the PC.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134 |
Yes, understood the 4's audio outs. It's RCA jacks I get hives with, not 1/4" plugs. USB midi is fine, just not a fan of USB audio ... but doesn't the 4 also have standard 5-pin midi connectors?
Anyway, it seems the 4 is designed so you can run a sequence on one chip while playing accompanyment on the other ... a good gigging set up. But my understanding is that there is no difference in the sound quality between the 2 and 4 since they use the same chip.
Prado
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333 |
I've got the Ketron Sd2 here, and run 2 rca's out to my bose toneport and it's stellar. I admit to the addiction to adding a couple of realtracks, makes the thing sound even better. As Mac and other have pointed out. The rca's end up as 1/8 jacks with adaptors, but I don't see even a remote problem with that, though the cable is a mere 2 feet... I suppose you could run the headphone jack out and adapt it if you have rca-itis.
John Conley
Musica est vita
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Quote:
Anyway, it seems the 4 is designed so you can run a sequence on one chip while playing accompanyment on the other ... a good gigging set up. But my understanding is that there is no difference in the sound quality between the 2 and 4 since they use the same chip.
Prado
Well, I certainly find a noticeable difference in the Grand Piano that lives in the Solo side of my SD-4. Much more pleasurable playing experience than the one in the GM bank.
==Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134 |
Sure, just because the chip is the same, doesn't mean the patches are the same. I bet the 'solo' chip has patches with more polyphony than those in the GM, since by definition you're only trying to play one instrument at a time instead of 16.
But then, if you were sequencing on the 'solo' side you'd possibly run out of voices with the higher polyphony instruments.
Do I recall correctly that the Ketron essentially gives you the patches, but they can't be edited?
Prado
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
The Solo side can be addressed as up to 32 channels of MIDI, just like the GM side can. It also has Upper Banks instruments. Don't know if Ketron really intends one to access them, but if you connect the Solo MIDI input to computer output and know the correct commands to send to it, they are there. Don't know why anyone would bother though, since the OTHER MIDI input is all set up and ready to go as GM plus Upper Banks right out of the box.
The Solo bank of the SD-4 comes with 64 Factory Preset patches and has 64 empty User Preset patches in the first bank.
The User can layer any two patches, with control over levels, effects, etc. and Save those to one of the User Presets for instant recall of the whole shebang.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134 |
Thanks for the scoop, Mac.
Prado
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,606
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,606 |
Quote:
I'm intrigued with the Ketron and listened to Mac's excellent Steely Dan arrangement on the web page (you're reelin' in the years, dude!).
Prado
Where'd ya find that??
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,203
Posts801,911
Members40,067
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean