|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,696
Expert
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,696 |
I came across this article on the Taxi.com site. As a songwriter who is not interested in a recording career, I am interested in marketing my songs. I've often wondered just how many of the blessings bestowed on we musicians by PG Music software I should incorporate into my song demos. When is enough enough? The link below came to me from Taxi and I thought that maybe some of you other writers out there might find it an interesting read - it is one man's view. Taxi.comAfter you read this article, I'd be interested in your comments on how you feel about your own demos. And what your aspirations are for your songs.  Cheers - Ian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,058
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,058 |
Very interesting and useful article. It's very applicable for us since neither my wife nor I are 23 American idol style(nor want to be) singer/songwriters
types.
We are interested in the Gospel segment of music/songwriting and still trying to learn how to get from what we think in a well composed work to the artist that may want to listen to our work.
This is why BIAB is for us a useful tool
Thanks for the link. Wyndham
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,219
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,219 |
Hi Ian,
Thanks for the link. It's an interesting article and makes a lot of sense. I have come across a number of publishers asking for full-band demos, though. I guess that in these cases, you can still pitch the song in the hope that the publisher listens. As is always the case, whatever type of demo, the publisher may or may not listen. I imagine that if you have a bit of a name happening in songwriting, then a stripped down demo might be all that's needed.
I think that using a professional singer is good advice. My thoughts are that ultimately, it will be the singing that stays in a person's head. So if this is strong, it has to be a bonus when submitting the demo.
As a note, I've been to a few Steve Seskin seminars. He's a singer/songwriter and has had 7 number 1 country hits. He always gets his demos professionally recorded and uses a singer other than himself.
Regards,
Noel
Last edited by Noel96; 04/09/10 01:41 PM.
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,157
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,157 |
Ian,
I do "ok" with song covers and Biab. I am still waiting for the songwriter gift, LOL. It is a gift and there are a few here, like yourself, who can put pen to the paper. My music is for entertaining myself and a few friends here or there, nothing serious. I think I can hear if a song has "it" or not, most of the time.
I haven't read the article yet, but what I understand of the "Nashville-Song Demo" occupation, they usually prefer their demo songs with just an acoustic guitar version and a vocal melody of the next "hit." That way, they can add their "business end" to it and market it to their intended artist. Just an opinion of mine, though.
The "business end" is making it sound like the intended artist had written it. Putting their "sound" in the song. I am talking Countrified here, btw. Toby Keith, Keith Urban, Willie Nelson etc . . . they all have their own identity in their "sound." Think of it as "branding" a song.
So, if someone is trying to sell a song, the song will stand by itself with its lyric and melody being demo'd on an acoustic guitar. Again, just an opinion here.
Trax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
I would say that a stripped down demo, played by a real instrumentalist, would go much farther than a BIAB or Real Band-enhanced track. Unless you have a really good ear for orchestration, that is. I hesitate to say this, but there is generally a common thread to the BIAB and RealBand supported demos posted here, IMO: they almost always pile on too much stuff. There's synth horns where there should be no horns. There are lead guitars going on throughout the whole song. There's a piano, B3, a fake acoustic track, a rhythm electric guitar, all going at the same time. There's TC Helicon vocal harmonies. Many times, what should be a gentle ballad is a big giant Dagwood sandwich of layers, most of which just don't belong. And for goodness sakes - please please please remove the count-off stick sounds from the beginning of the song. I'm going to use some songs of a fellow FAWMer, demonstrating when he had it just right, and when he layered in too much. He is a brilliant songwriter and composer - but we feel comfortable critiquing each other's material. His name is Tim Conway. (not that one). Now, he refers to UK English terms (caravan, chips, take-away, etc.) Here is a great demo; 2 minutes - even though the Ukulele is out of tune somewhat: http://www.oddbod.net/dungeness.mp3Let's break it down. It's a great melody. The lyrics evoke emotion and a sense of place and time. There's perhaps 5 or 6 tracks total in this song. I bet you will be singing this song to yourself later aver you take a listen. Everything supports the melody - even the reversed guitar track is a pad that let's the simple melody and words penetrate. Now, here's another one of his tunes, in the style of Ju Ju High Life (sp?): http://www.oddbod.net/patrice.mp3Take a guess at what happened here that makes this one less memorable. The drum track is too busy for this song. In this style of song the guitars almost always carry the rhythm. Only in the bridge/3rd verse section do the drums calm a bit. Tim laid on the tracks too much in this one - even with the hoot whistle and B3 stacked into the sandwich of the two guitars for the last chorus/outro - too much. You won't remember the lyrics to this song, because they got buried in the busy accompaniment. Leaving on a positive note, here is Diamond Mine: http://www.oddbod.net/diamond.mp3Again, perhaps 5-8 total tracks, not all happening at once. This one leaves room for a Queen-type Bohemian Rhapsody monstrous accompaniment right down to just piano and vox. The tune and lyrics stand on their own. There are some melody hooks in this one that will haunt for a day or so. Keep in mind, with the exception of Dungeness, Tim did these songs in max of 2 or 3 days each in the evenings. Do less for more impact. Take a tour through Tim's site for mostly great demos. One thing that you'll notice with Tim's stuff; very wide variety of styles, some retro references, and almost always a great break somewhere in the song that just makes you anticipate the return with all your might.
Last edited by rockstar_not; 04/09/10 08:27 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
The reality is that "either way can work and either way can fall".
For at the bottom of this thing lies the actual song itself. If it can "stand alone" it will likely still get attention. There have been rather recent examples of just that happening.
On the other hand, you should find out what your target wants you to submit. If you are submitting to a house that routinely solicits for fully fleshed out demos, it would be of benefit for you to pursue the same path.
But again, whether your demo is a simple voice-and-guitar or a fullblown production number, it is the songwriting itself that sells the work. Or not.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 17
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 17 |
I am song-writer rather than a performer, although I have played in bands and done some live gigs.
Having just read all the above, it does strike a chord... (pun not actually intended!)
I had already decided to do a number of versions of my best songs:
1. simple backing + 'song'
2. a fuller production (IF and only IF the song actually needs it..)
3. my own version with me performing it
On 1. & 2. above I have decided to use a professional singer as I am sick and tired of people criticising my vocal rather than listening to THE SONG.
As for the selling of the song side, I have worked in Sales & Marketing for twenty years so I have some thoughts on that! Also, I am voraciously reading/listening to any advice that is out there!
Good luck to one and all, including me!
Frage
New to BIAB and just got hold of a 2007 Megapak... but I have been writing songs for quite awhile... most of them hits (of course..) :-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,696
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,696 |
 Thanks all for your input. I must admit I do like building arrangements with this software  . After reading your replies I decided to tour the Taxi site and visit their "Industry Listings". Publishing companies looking for TV placements suggest and stress good quality home recordings as acceptable demos with good instrumentation and universal lyrics and no uncleared samples. They want ready for air. There seem to be a lot of publishers looking for material for TV/Film usage. It's the big thing. Fewer listings asking for individual songs for recording artists. Personally while I'd like to hire a singer for the some of the songs I write that I have trouble singing myself, lack of funds does stand in the way . . . still looking for an affordable pitch correction software to smooth out the bumps in the road.  Frage - I like your approach - if you plan your production well - for several eventualities - then you're ahead of the game. And like Mac suggests, respond with whatever they're asking. It's all a longshot. Cheers - Ian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,058
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,058 |
Ian, I believe the vocals are the most important part in that you can lose an audience very quickly with an off note or 2. There are at least 10 local bluegrass bands and only one or two have good lead vocals, but.. good vocalist are out there.
Instead of hiring, check out some local talent. If you find a good vocalist to do the demo it helps them and you and saved money too. You might have to go through a few but it might be worth the trouble. Some churches have some very good talent that won't be found anywhere but there in church.
I thought "Diamond Mine" was interesting but his vocals were swallowed up by the instruments. Now I have a bit of a hearing loss so maybe it was me. I'm just saying what I heard.
The other thing we all need and I at the head of the line is objective criticisms and advice because we hear what we want to hear sometimes. I think my wifes voice is great but I would like to know what the truth is about the quality of her voice. Is it good enough for demos or not, but who do you ask?
Just a few thoughts on a warm Sunday morning . Don't know if it's worth the electrons or not. Wyndham
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Season's Greetings!
Wishing everyone a happy, healthy holiday season—thanks for being part of our community!
The office will be closed for Christmas Day, but we will be back on Boxing Day (Dec 26th) at 6:00am PST.
Team PG
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: The Newly Designed Piano Roll Window
In this video, we explore the updated Piano Roll, complete with a modernized look and exciting new features. You’ll see new filtering options that make it easy to focus on specific note groups, smoother and more intuitive note entry and editing, and enhanced options for zooming, looping, and more.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: AI Stems & Notes - split polyphonic audio into instruments and transcribe
This video demonstrates how to use the new AI-Notes feature together with the AI-Stems splitter, allowing you to select an audio file and have it separated into individual stems while transcribing each one to its own MIDI track. AI-Notes converts polyphonic audio—either full mixes or individual instruments—into MIDI that you can view in notation or play back instantly.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®
With your version 2026 for Windows Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- Android Band-in-a-Box® App (included)
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Video: New User Interface (GUI)
Join Tobin as he takes you on a tour of the new user interface in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®! This modern GUI redesign offers a sleek new look with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, and a smoother workflow. The brand-new side toolbar puts track selection, the MultiPicker Library, and other essential tools right at your fingertips. Plus, our upgraded Multi-View lets you layer multiple windows without overlap, giving you a highly flexible workspace. Many windows—including Tracks, Piano Roll, and more—have been redesigned for improved usability and a cleaner, more intuitive interface, and more!
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Introducing XPro Styles PAK 10 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 10 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 28 RealTracks and RealDrums!
Few things are certain in life: death, taxes, and a brand spankin’ new XPro Styles PAK! In this, the 10th edition of our XPro Styles PAK series, we’ve got 100 styles coming your way! We have the classic 25 styles each from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, and rounding out this volume's wildcard slot is 25 styles in the Praise & Worship genre! A wide spanning genre, you can find everything from rock, folk, country, and more underneath its umbrella. The included 28 RealTracks and RealDrums can be used with any Band-in-a-Box® 2026 (and higher) package.
Here’s just a small sampling of what you can look forward to in XPro Styles PAK 10: Soft indie folk worship songs, bumpin’ country boogies, gospel praise breaks, hard rockin’ pop, funky disco grooves, smooth Latin jazz pop, bossa nova fusion, western swing, alternative hip-hop, cool country funk, and much more!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 10 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 10 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Introducing Xtra Styles PAK 21 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest Xtra Styles PAK installment—the all new Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher)!
Rejoice, one and all, for Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box® is here! We’re serving up 200 brand spankin’ new styles to delight your musical taste buds! The first three courses are the classics you’ve come to know and love, including offerings from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, but, not to be outdone, this year’s fourth course is bro country! A wide ranging genre, you can find everything from hip-hop, uptempo outlaw country, hard hitting rock, funk, and even electronica, all with that familiar bro country flair. The dinner bell has been rung, pickup up Xtra Styles PAK 21 today!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Energetic folk rock, raucous train beats, fast country boogies, acid jazz grooves, laid-back funky jams, a bevy of breezy jazz waltzes, calm electro funk, indie synth pop, industrial synth metal, and more bro country than could possibly fit in the back of a pickup truck!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 21 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 21 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 21.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 21 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 21 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics85,393
Posts791,592
Members39,875
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean