Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#747568 01/03/23 12:48 AM
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,110
M
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
M
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,110
This is a reason why I keep posting info and ideas:

I open a VSTi like Superior Drummer 3, EZDrummer 3 and it all works so smoothly with real time signatures and real tempo maps.
Biab has the most vast incredible content BUT you need to be able to access it like the Toontracks VSTi's INSTANTLY.
So I keep posting regardless if there is interest or not, it may just go over the top of those reading the posts, it may annoy some that don't like change.
I liken it to one who travels back in time and tells those there of the future and they think he is crazy.
I won't be here forever so while I'm here I post the ideas and suggestions I see. Who knows maybe way down the track they might get used when things evolve a bit more and understanding grows.
I'm not here to run PG into the ground but try to lift it up where it needs to be, as professional as it's professional content.
I don't get anything out of it, I don't do it for "ME".

Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
EZy-To-Use-VSTi.png (304.66 KB, 268 downloads)
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 185
L
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
L
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 185
I agree. If I am on a forum posting negatively about something, it's done in the hope of change.

My problem with change is it's so rarely done for the better. If we all moan about the GUI in BIAB that'll probably be "addressed" with a fashionable flat, dark, colourless, borderless and very limited customisable interface with no separation between elements, as is the current trend. In my opinion there is nothing good about this.

The argument is about eyestrain but nobody accepts the fact it causes mental strain and drives you crazy trying to separate things visually. I guess it depends on your workflow, but for me, when I'm using software I am generally very busy - switching between screens, changing settings and values etc etc. The colourless lack of separation makes this a nightmare.

For me, the one thing that would make BIAB a thousand times better is not to bring it into the future but simply bring it into the early nineties would be good enough for me. New usable features? Yes maybe, but not at the cost of usability. BIAB is already very versatile but it's such a total mess that using it just brings you down and makes you want to give up.

Example, I spent all day yesterday trying to do a very basic task - it ended in me playing around, reverse engineering and experimenting all day just trying to make some sense of what is going on, in the hope that it will educate better for the next time I want to do something similar. The end result is if you finally figure it out, you'll have no chance of ever remembering it again. There is no logic, no common sense, no consistency.

The look of the GUI, in my opinion is OK, looks dated but it works. Customisable menu bars and keyboard shortcuts alone would improve things massively. But above all, I just want it to make sense. I want to be able to figure out the signal flow. I want all pop ups and options to be correlated. It's like everything they do is the complete opposite of the norm and you are just left guessing. Everything is just too random and inconsistent. The options that are obvious take way too many unnecessary clicks. Something that should be a simple click away is nested in submenus that you always have to look for, they're so buried that you can't just memorise things easily.

Pop ups that should stay open, close with each click. Just silly things like this and the list is huge.
Organisation. The styles, realtracks and drums - just another mess. The filter doesn't filter, it sorts things into just a different kind of mess. Ez drummer for example as you mentioned. Organised into styles, fills, grooves etc. Easy to find what you are looking for and choose what you want. This isn't modern, it's been the norm for 20+ years in just about every software I've ever know, seen or used. Just common sense.

For me - necessary changes to the GUI is nothing to do with the Graphic elements, just the user interface - it's in the name! Make the interface usable. If we all moan about it then the response will probably be the usual flat, colourless ... etc. with no improvement to usability.

I know this is like a huge rant, and of course, it is - but like you I do so in hope of change. If we stay quiet then things won't happen. BIAB is incredible and I use it almost daily. If there was any alternative then I would be gone, would have happened long ago. But there isn't so the more chance there is that they improve the workflow the more chance I'll stay loyal. We aren't that far away from being able to do a lot of this stuff with simplicity using DAWs and VSTs. My guess is within the next five years I won't be needing to use BIAB as often as I do because I'll just opt for the quicker, easier and more editable version of doing everything in the DAW. They currently still have the time and opportunity to stay ahead of the game but their time is running out.

Again, just to clarify, this isn't a rant for rant's sake - it's just a desperate call for change - put the features on hold, don't change the interface to borderless and just make things easy to figure out, with consistency.

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,893
C
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,893
<< "Example, I spent all day yesterday trying to do a very basic task - it ended in me playing around, reverse engineering and experimenting all day just trying to make some sense of what is going on, in the hope that it will educate better for the next time I want to do something similar. The end result is if you finally figure it out, you'll have no chance of ever remembering it again. There is no logic, no common sense, no consistency." >>

Could you share your example of the basic task that took "all day"?


BIAB 2026:RB 2026, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 185
L
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
L
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 185
Originally Posted By: Charlie Fogle


Could you share your example of the basic task that took "all day"?


Yes and no. Now I've fixed it, the problems I had aren't so easy to remember and replicate, but I'll try to give the gist of things.

Simple task: Load a Hi-q patch on a utility track. In this instance it was Rock drum kit in sforzando. Create a beat in the piano roll (already a fiddly task) - decide I don't like the kit so changed it to playable realdrum "funklondon".

All good, happy with the sound. Close program, come back later, it's reverted to Rock kit. Weird, I'll change it again, maybe I didn't save? Nope, tried again - it won't save. Maybe this is normal behaviour for BIAB but it's certainly not "expected" behaviour from someone using software every day of their lives.

No problem, I'll see if I can figure out how to force the patch to save. Off to forum, quick look through the manual. No easy or obvious answer so I'm left experimenting and trying to figure things out.

Try again from the start. I'm now experimenting and testing in a temporary project. Create utility etc, select hi-q patch, choose funklondon ... up comes a pop up. "Aria session" or some such can't load, version is out of date.

Back to Google, back to the forum - what's Aria session loader? Turns out something to do with Plogue Art.

Me thinking "Surely it can't be out of date", I've only just updated to 2023, why would they show a playable realtrack that I can't use. Maybe I've done something wrong with the install? Back to the installer and reinstall BIAB update.

Nope, same problem. Sod it, I'll deal with that later and first see if I can find out how to make this patch stick.

More messing around, more experimenting, more forum searches. I end up in track settings (F7) trying to make some sense of how things work.

So far, all I can figure out is that only the first patch selected will get saved with the song. Now, this isn't actually true, it's just all I am able to determine at this point through experimentation, loading patches, saving, re-opening, etc.

At this point I'm clueless - it will let me load funklondon, let me play funklondon, it displays funklondon in the track mixer etc etc, it just won't save. Eventually I figure out that if it doesn't show in the top list of the track settings window then it won't save. Try the same in Cubase, load sforzando, choose instrument no problem, everything is saved as expected, nothing weird, all saves no problem.

In short, the only way to save a patch in BIAB is to load it from within BIAB itself. Completely unusual, not in the slightest expected behaviour and nothing to make this obvious.

All of these oddities wouldn't be so bad if we had some clue with what was going on and how BIAB does things. Nothing is intuitive. The little + sign in the track settings window in the midi patch section has little or nothing to do with midi patches as we'd normally expect so it takes a while to figure these things out. Nothing is consistent.

Ultimately, the session loader needed updating, it now works. No mention of this in the manual, very little on the forum and not updated with the program update.

It's just hard to get your head around things with such a convoluted piece of software where nothing works the same as pretty much all other software out there.

These kind of things happen often when I use BIAB. Maybe I just try to dig too deep into the details and understand how the thing works and what it's doing. After 25 odd years, I'm none the wiser.

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 25,064
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 25,064
I agree. I have been begging for real time signatures for a long time.

If you stay in the PGM world or you play your instrument/voice to PGM time signatures you are OK. BUT if you try to communicate outside of the PGM world you are DOA with anything other than 2/4, 3/4, or 4/4.

IMHO I think they are doing wonders with some very old coding however it is time for a complete rewrite.

YMMV


Life is short so make sure you spend as much time as possible on the Internet arguing with strangers.

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,606
C
Expert
Offline
Expert
C
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,606
I agree, EZ Drummer 3 provides a beautiful example of a very well thought and executed GUI, which not only does not hinder the user's workflow, but also enhances the user's creativity.

Despite having thousands of grooves in its database, it is always very easy to find exactly the groove you are looking for, thanks to the great categorization of the content, very powerful and well-defined filters, the ability to easily combine parts from different grooves, and, last but not least, thaks to game-changing features, such as Tap2find, or the new "Band mate", a feature that listens to the music and comes up with a beat.

Very good ideas that could also work really, really well in BIAB.


Last edited by Cerio; 01/03/23 01:13 PM.

Latest BIAB version, latest build.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,964
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,964
Originally Posted By: Lee N
I know this is like a huge rant, and of course, it is - but like you I do so in hope of change. If we stay quiet then things won't happen. BIAB is incredible and I use it almost daily. If there was any alternative then I would be gone, would have happened long ago. But there isn't so the more chance there is that they improve the workflow the more chance I'll stay loyal. We aren't that far away from being able to do a lot of this stuff with simplicity using DAWs and VSTs. My guess is within the next five years I won't be needing to use BIAB as often as I do because I'll just opt for the quicker, easier and more editable version of doing everything in the DAW. They currently still have the time and opportunity to stay ahead of the game but their time is running out.

I started with BIAB in 2012 and immediately recognized how behind the curve it was compared to other modern software. The changes since then have only been patchwork that in some ways make it even harder to use as new "features" (that sometimes are not finished) get bolted onto the program and in the way of workflow. I agree time is running out!

Originally Posted By: MarioD
IMHO I think they are doing wonders with some very old coding however it is time for a complete rewrite.

I agree 100%! It is amazing what I can get out of BIAB but it does need a complete rewrite. The two problems I see with that are 1) convincing PGM this is necessary and 2) I doubt they have a team that could do this.

Originally Posted By: Cerio
I agree, EZ Drummer 3 provides a beautiful example of a very well thought and executed GUI, which not only does not hinder the user's workflow, but also enhances the user's creativity.

Agreed! EZ Drummer 3 should be installed on every PGM programmer's computer and it should be studied as a great example of awesome software design!

I appreciate forum power-users who contribute their knowledge and share long-winded, convoluted work-arounds to the various warts we encounter with BIAB. I just wish they (and PGM) understood that these work-arounds should not be necessary in the first place! Using a piece of software in this manner sucks all of the fun and creativity out of the work.

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 185
L
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
L
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 185
Originally Posted By: JohnJohnJohn

I started with BIAB in 2012 and immediately recognized how behind the curve it was compared to other modern software. The changes since then have only been patchwork that in some ways make it even harder to use as new "features" (that sometimes are not finished) get bolted onto the program and in the way of workflow. I agree time is running out!



I don't remember when I got started with BIAB, probably late 90s, maybe early 2000s. It was clunky even back then, but was quite versatile. There was another one out at the time called Jammer - far far easier to use and intuitive but just didn't have quite the versatility of BIAB, so I went with BIAB.

I've no regrets, I still love the software but if I want to do anything more than type in some chords and load a style, then I just end up frustrated, nearly every time. Things I expect it to do or want it to do are so clumsy or hard to figure out that I usually give up in boredom or frustration of getting nowhere. Then one day you read in the forum about something and think "ah, brilliant, you can do that like this". It shouldn't be this difficult to figure things out.

I agree a complete software re-write would be the way to go but in the meantime there is so much that can be done, probably quite easily, just to tidy things up and make life easier.

As an analogy, IMO, if BIAB was a car, the handbrake would be on the passenger side, the accelerator on the left, brakes on the right, the headlights could be switched on by going outside and pressing each light three times, and each door would have its own separate key ... etc etc. Yes, we could argue that the car is still usable but we just couldn't be bothered going out in the dark or carrying passengers. As for changing the oil? We'd probably never figure out how!

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,681
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,681
Originally Posted By: JohnJohnJohn
..I appreciate forum power-users who contribute their knowledge and share long-winded, convoluted work-arounds to the various warts we encounter with BIAB. I just wish they (and PGM) understood that these work-arounds should not be necessary in the first place! ...
What makes you think that those experienced users here who do that are not working behind the scenes, as well as openly in the forums, to recommend changes to the program?


BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,142
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,142
Quote:
I appreciate forum power-users who contribute their knowledge and share long-winded, convoluted work-arounds to the various warts we encounter with BIAB. I just wish they (and PGM) understood that these work-arounds should not be necessary in the first place!

Believe me, we get frustrated too. And there is plenty of interaction with the developers, but improvements can only occur with their practical involvement and cooperation.


BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,964
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,964
Originally Posted By: Matt Finley
Originally Posted By: JohnJohnJohn
..I appreciate forum power-users who contribute their knowledge and share long-winded, convoluted work-arounds to the various warts we encounter with BIAB. I just wish they (and PGM) understood that these work-arounds should not be necessary in the first place! ...
What makes you think that those experienced users here who do that are not working behind the scenes, as well as openly in the forums, to recommend changes to the program?

I am glad to hear experienced users are working on this. My frustration with this specific issue is when someone reports an obvious buggy weirdness or makes a reasonable wishlist request and someone responds as if it is not a problem at all if they will just learn the long-winded work-around they have created/discovered! And to be fair, I don't recall you ever doing that, Matt!

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,964
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,964
Originally Posted By: AudioTrack
Quote:
I appreciate forum power-users who contribute their knowledge and share long-winded, convoluted work-arounds to the various warts we encounter with BIAB. I just wish they (and PGM) understood that these work-arounds should not be necessary in the first place!

Believe me, we get frustrated too. And there is plenty of interaction with the developers, but improvements can only occur with their practical involvement and cooperation.

AudioTrack, your posts are always helpful! I was more referring to those who get defensive about perceived BIAB criticism.

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,142
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,142
Originally Posted By: JohnJohnJohn

AudioTrack, your posts are always helpful! I was more referring to those who get defensive about perceived BIAB criticism.

JJJ, All good. I follow exactly what you mean wink


BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,402
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,402
+1

In my view, all what is said in posts above is perfectly summarized in a single sentence by Lee:

"They currently still have the time and opportunity to stay ahead of the
game but their time is running out."


It would be very sad if they don't take advantage of this "opportunity".

I believe, Ergonomics/workflow + consistency (both functions and visual) should be priority #1 for the BIAB(software*) at
this point in time. Functions are there, just make them usable and user friendly. And of course fix known problems ASAP.


*Excluding RT/RD/MIDI and other creative content, which is great.

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 25,064
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 25,064
Originally Posted By: Rustyspoon#
+1

In my view, all what is said in posts above is perfectly summarized in a single sentence by Lee:

"They currently still have the time and opportunity to stay ahead of the
game but their time is running out."


It would be very sad if they don't take advantage of this "opportunity".

I believe, Ergonomics/workflow + consistency (both functions and visual) should be priority #1 for the BIAB(software*) at
this point in time. Functions are there, just make them usable and user friendly. And of course fix known problems ASAP.


*Excluding RT/RD/MIDI and other creative content, which is great.


They are already way behind in the MIDI department. Companies like Toontrack have already passed them. Some of the MIDI piano, drums,etc loops are excellent. PGM is ahead in the RT and RD department because that is their main focus, and rightly so as it is their cash cow.


Life is short so make sure you spend as much time as possible on the Internet arguing with strangers.

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,402
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,402
Mario,
I believe PGM has enough of MIDI content, just most of it is not very usable because of workflow limitation.
Specifically, I am talking about individual instrument parts of huge library of PG MIDI styles. These are nearly impossible to extract into individual instrument tracks that can be mixed and matched like RT, RD and Super Midi tracks.

On top of that, many 3rd party MIDI pattern / loop libraries cost close to nothing. It's BIAB workflow that has issues/limitations with properly integrating those into composition.

In theory, you should simply be able to audition midi pattern or midi loop in a picker, place it on a track of your choice and it should follow tempo and chord changes without doing crazy acrobatics. If we are on the same page, it is a workflow item.

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 25,064
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 25,064
Misha,

Yes, I agree that the workflow is a major part of the problem, thus my "PGM is ahead in the RT and RD department" statement. That was part of what I was talking about.

However there are third party MIDI loops/tracks that are far superior to many of PGM MIDI tracks.

Some of PGM MIDI tracks are fantastic and I think your selecting individual MIDI tracks greatly enhance BiaB.


Life is short so make sure you spend as much time as possible on the Internet arguing with strangers.

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 617
S
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
S
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 617
Maybe it all will end up like a type Kodak Company situation. A market leading company and brand for decades where management failed to see or believe in the changes of the industry at that time even though a majority of the competition was.


BIAB 2026, Studio Pro 8, Song Master Pro, Win11 Home. i7-9700K CPU, 32GB, ESI MAYA44eX, ZOOM UAC-2, Guitar Pro 8, Transcribe, (EZKeys2, EZD3, SD3, EZBass, EZMix3)
Amateur: fiddle, guitar, vocal, beginner on bass.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,681
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,681
A minor offshoot of this thread is about PG Music and MIDI. I just wanted to mention that I really enjoy the jazz piano MIDI Supertracks. I wish PG Music would release more of these. I know it didn't get widespread support when this was last discussed, but there are a few folks like Mario who use MIDI extensively and would really appreciate resuming making these.


BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 25,064
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 25,064
Originally Posted By: shlind
Maybe it all will end up like a type Kodak Company situation. A market leading company and brand for decades where management failed to see or believe in the changes of the industry at that time even though a majority of the competition was.


Yep. I know this quite well as I worked at Kodak research for 39 years. I went digital early on with a 2.1 MP camera. Most employees thought digital was just a phase. Well it has been a long phase hasn't it.


Life is short so make sure you spend as much time as possible on the Internet arguing with strangers.

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Introducing XPro Styles PAK 11 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2026 and Higher!

XPro Styles PAK 11 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box® version 2026 (and higher) is here with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 31 RealTracks/RealDrums!

Guess who’s back again? That’s right! It’s our XPro Styles PAK’s triumphant return with the 11th edition in this series! 100 new styles are coming your way spread across the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres. And this edition's wildcard genre explores the immense and far-reaching catalogue of electronic music! The included 31 RealTracks and RealDrums can be used with any Band-in-a-Box® 2026 (and higher) package.

Special offers available until August 31st, 2026!

All the XPro Styles PAKs 1-11 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!

Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.

Video: XPro Styles PAK 11 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!

XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2026 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.

Introducing Xtra Styles PAK 22 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2026 and Higher!

Xtra Styles PAK 22 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2026 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!

It’s time to celebrate! Xtra Styles PAK 22 for Band-in-a-Box® is here, and we've got 200 brand-new styles coming your way!

No Xtra Styles PAK is complete without the classic rock & pop, jazz, and country volumes you know and love, and we’ve got plenty to share, with 150 styles spread across too many genres to list! Of course, it also wouldn’t be complete with our special wildcard volume to add a little spice and pizzazz to the mix. This year, because we loved it so much the first time, we’ve decided to make the second iteration of our SynthMaster volume, full of new sounds, interesting genres, and 50 engaging styles, all making use of the diverse SynthMaster plugin! Here you can find genres such as airy yacht rock, sultry electrotango, and even some synth soca funk. Don’t wait, pickup up Xtra Styles PAK 22 today!

In this PAK you can find: dulcet folk ballads, funky gospel country, Brazilian jazz fusion, upbeat 1980s pop, classic Americana, a plethora of breezy bossa novas, indie singer-songwriter, scintillating synthwave, exuberant electronica, and many, many more!

Special offers available until August 31st, 2026!

All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1-22 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 22 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!

Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 22.

Video: Xtra Styles PAK 22 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!

Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 22 requires the 2026 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.

Introducing XPro Styles PAK 11 – Now Available for Mac Band-in-a-Box 2026 and Higher!

XPro Styles PAK 11 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box® version 2026 (and higher) is here with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 31 RealTracks/RealDrums!

Guess who’s back again? That’s right! It’s our XPro Styles PAK’s triumphant return with the 11th edition in this series! 100 new styles are coming your way spread across the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres. And this edition's wildcard genre explores the immense and far-reaching catalogue of electronic music! The included 31 RealTracks and RealDrums can be used with any Band-in-a-Box® 2026 (and higher) package.

Special offers available until August 31st, 2026!

All the XPro Styles PAKs 1-11 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!

Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.

Video: XPro Styles PAK 11 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!

XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2026 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.

Introducing Xtra Styles PAK 22 – Now Available for Mac Band-in-a-Box 2026 and Higher!

Xtra Styles PAK 22 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2026 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!

It’s time to celebrate! Xtra Styles PAK 22 for Band-in-a-Box® is here, and we've got 200 brand-new styles coming your way!

No Xtra Styles PAK is complete without the classic rock & pop, jazz, and country volumes you know and love, and we’ve got plenty to share, with 150 styles spread across too many genres to list! Of course, it also wouldn’t be complete with our special wildcard volume to add a little spice and pizzazz to the mix. This year, because we loved it so much the first time, we’ve decided to make the second iteration of our SynthMaster volume, full of new sounds, interesting genres, and 50 engaging styles, all making use of the diverse SynthMaster plugin! Here you can find genres such as airy yacht rock, sultry electrotango, and even some synth soca funk. Don’t wait, pickup up Xtra Styles PAK 22 today!

In this PAK you can find: dulcet folk ballads, funky gospel country, Brazilian jazz fusion, upbeat 1980s pop, classic Americana, a plethora of breezy bossa novas, indie singer-songwriter, scintillating synthwave, exuberant electronica, and many, many more!

Special offers available until August 31st, 2026!

All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1-22 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 22 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!

Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 22.

Video: Xtra Styles PAK 22 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!

Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 22 requires the 2026 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.

Peter Gannon Talks Band-in-a-Box with zplane

zplane recently interviewed Peter Gannon, the founder and creator of Band-in-a-Box, about the software's early days, what sets it apart from AI, how zplane's audio algorithms are used in Band-in-a-Box, and more!

Special thanks to the team at zplane for their continued support.

Check out the full interview here: https://products.zplane.de/blog/peter-gannon-interview-pg-music

Last Chance! The Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® Special Ends Today (May 31, 2026) at 11:59pm PDT!

Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PDT today!

We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!

Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.

Another exciting new addition is the amazing new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. View the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to transcribe an entire track or transcribe specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®.

There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, and much more!

Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Mac® to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!

Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.

If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Special Offers Extended Until May 31st!

Good news- we've extended our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® special offers until May 31, 2026!

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 is packed with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can transcribe an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, and much more!

There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®.

When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PDT on May 31st, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.

Check out the Band-in-a-Box® for Mac packages page to find the best package for you.

Forum Statistics
Forums57
Topics86,632
Posts807,735
Members40,177
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
Newest Members
Neveralull, alebasa, Shegzy Empire, JAZZ72, herjan
40,177 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 90
rsdean 83
WaoBand 48
DrDan 42
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5