Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Hi All,

I've been doing some research into the Art MPA II Tube Pre Amp and wondering if anyone has one or used one and are they any good for improving vocal quality?

Art MPA II

Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
Art MPA II.jpg (172 KB, 145 downloads)
Last edited by Paul Haynes; 03/14/24 01:20 PM.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 26,959
Veteran
Online Happy
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 26,959
I used to use the first model. It did give a warmer tone to the sound, owing to a vacuum tube. I believe it was a compressor as well.


BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Originally Posted by Matt Finley
I used to use the first model. It did give a warmer tone to the sound, owing to a vacuum tube. I believe it was a compressor as well.

Hi, what did you use it on? Vocals or instrument?

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 26,959
Veteran
Online Happy
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 26,959
Both, at different times.


BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,436
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,436
PH.

fyi ive done thousand of vocal tracks over the years useing everything from a 50 buck art to very high end commercial studio consoles and outboard pre's.
maybe others will disagree but comparing the final mixes i would say the consumer buying your song from my tests anyway is more interested if the song floats their boat.
in conclusion imho assuming the pre is working correctly i would say the trick is how the vocals are treated post recording.

if you doubt me there is a highly entertaining lengthy thread on gearspace.com where audio examples are posted re 50 buck art versus higher cost fare to see if people could tell the diff without knowing which was which. the reveal was a hoot.
just search gearspace for it.

if you are concerned just rent a bunch of pre's for a week from a gear store and record vocs with each to compare.this should assuage your concerns. do your own tests.

in summary i believe there are other things to worry about other than the pre.
for more info you tube has lots of comparisons.
now i'm gonna go do some vocs on an old germanium transistor pre..lol.
ps also on gearspace is a hilarious thread comparing the legendary
diy 5 dollar pre versus high end stuff.

happiness.

om 🇨🇦 🇬🇧

Last edited by justanoldmuso; 03/15/24 05:15 AM.

my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs
(90 songs created useing bb/rb)
(lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,145
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,145
Originally Posted by Paul Haynes
Hi All,

I've been doing some research into the Art MPA II Tube Pre Amp and wondering if anyone has one or used one and are they any good for improving vocal quality?

I guess I'd first have to ask, what kind of Mic are you using?

That could make a lot of difference in any answers I could offer, and I would hope it would affect others input as well.
Also, what did you have previously to compare it to?
Since you asked if it might 'improve' the vocals, that is a comparison that would need the starting point. A vs B ..


I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,323
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,323
I agree with Harv.

The best thing to spend your money on is a great mic, and of course you need a good interface.

Almost every other treatment these days can be done with software in post prod.

But that is just me. Everyone has their own "sound" they are going for.

You may need an old 1950s ribbon mic if you can find one for 10,000.

smile

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,106
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,106
I boughnt one of these quite a while ago
https://www.soundonsound.com/reviews/behringer-mic100
it gets good writeups and is amazingly cheap but frankly i stoppped using it as the recorded tracks were not significantly enhanced and I get good results using eq and other fx quite sparingly on a signal from a condenser mic straightr into the behringer UMC204HD which i presmu has much the same preamps but without the tube.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,323
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,323
This little thing is free. Gets great reviews and for a reason. Niiiiiiccee.


https://varietyofsound.wordpress.com/2022/04/04/booteq-mkiii-released/

Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
Boot EQ.jpg (235.01 KB, 70 downloads)
Last edited by David Snyder; 03/17/24 07:15 AM.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,436
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,436
David.

very nice. kudos for finding that.
i'm gonna try to find time to test it.
there are many free channel strips on the net if one googles 'channel strip vst plugin.'

happiness

om


my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs
(90 songs created useing bb/rb)
(lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,323
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,323
The same website has a lot of free plugins by this guy, Variety of Sound. They are all awesome.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Originally Posted by justanoldmuso
PH.

fyi ive done thousand of vocal tracks over the years useing everything from a 50 buck art to very high end commercial studio consoles and outboard pre's.
maybe others will disagree but comparing the final mixes i would say the consumer buying your song from my tests anyway is more interested if the song floats their boat.
in conclusion imho assuming the pre is working correctly i would say the trick is how the vocals are treated post recording.

if you doubt me there is a highly entertaining lengthy thread on gearspace.com where audio examples are posted re 50 buck art versus higher cost fare to see if people could tell the diff without knowing which was which. the reveal was a hoot.
just search gearspace for it.

if you are concerned just rent a bunch of pre's for a week from a gear store and record vocs with each to compare.this should assuage your concerns. do your own tests.

in summary i believe there are other things to worry about other than the pre.
for more info you tube has lots of comparisons.
now i'm gonna go do some vocs on an old germanium transistor pre..lol.
ps also on gearspace is a hilarious thread comparing the legendary
diy 5 dollar pre versus high end stuff.

happiness.

om 🇨🇦 🇬🇧

Thanks for your reply. I'm always keen to consider anything that improves my vocals. I lack confidence and am a perfectionist. I hear my vocal flaws and do my best to iron them out.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Originally Posted by rharv
Originally Posted by Paul Haynes
Hi All,

I've been doing some research into the Art MPA II Tube Pre Amp and wondering if anyone has one or used one and are they any good for improving vocal quality?

I guess I'd first have to ask, what kind of Mic are you using?

That could make a lot of difference in any answers I could offer, and I would hope it would affect others input as well.
Also, what did you have previously to compare it to?
Since you asked if it might 'improve' the vocals, that is a comparison that would need the starting point. A vs B ..

I have 2x mics I use for recording my vocals. Beyerdynamic M88TG + Rode K2

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Originally Posted by David Snyder
I agree with Harv.

The best thing to spend your money on is a great mic, and of course you need a good interface.

Almost every other treatment these days can be done with software in post prod.

But that is just me. Everyone has their own "sound" they are going for.

You may need an old 1950s ribbon mic if you can find one for 10,000.

smile

I use a Beyerdynamic M88TG + Rode K2 going into a Presonus Audiobox 22VSL with XMAX Class A preamps.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Originally Posted by David Snyder
This little thing is free. Gets great reviews and for a reason. Niiiiiiccee.


https://varietyofsound.wordpress.com/2022/04/04/booteq-mkiii-released/

Thanks for that. I have LOADS of plug ins. Spent a few hundred ££ on WAVES plus a lovely Lexicon Reverb set of plugins and others including those from StudioOne.

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
So I bought one to try out of curiosity. I've used it on my Takamine & M88TG and on both multiple test recordings both sounded better in that recordings were fuller & warmer I would say. Presonus although clean sounding, sounds thinner by comparison. It's a keeper. Looks cool on my desk also!

Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
IMG_1261.jpg (330.82 KB, 54 downloads)
Last edited by Paul Haynes; 03/18/24 02:36 PM.
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,145
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,145
Thanks for the update on your experience with it.
Yes it does look cool.
I'd be interested to know how the variable Impedance works in real life.
Can it handle both a LCD and something like an SM-57 or SM-58 OK?
An SM mic (or similar) would benefit from much different settings.
It looks like each channel can have it's own impedance, so that would be nice.

Last edited by rharv; 03/18/24 03:36 PM.

I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,436
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,436
var impedence.

For those happy with current pre but no var imp feature...never used but art have a new product called rp1.
it has a variable imp input. for ribbon and dynamic mics.
so one can go i guess as follows
mic to rp1 to next device in chain.
it also is a signal booster.
for more info see arts web site.

for other similar var imp gear and boosters.
just google. eg i just came across alctron ?

hth.

om


my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs
(90 songs created useing bb/rb)
(lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Journeyman
OP Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 420
Originally Posted by rharv
Thanks for the update on your experience with it.
Yes it does look cool.
I'd be interested to know how the variable Impedance works in real life.
Can it handle both a LCD and something like an SM-57 or SM-58 OK?
An SM mic (or similar) would benefit from much different settings.
It looks like each channel can have it's own impedance, so that would be nice.

I've only played with it a little so far but have tried two mics - Beyerdynamic M88TG and Rode K2. Both have a 200 impedance. I've cranked it up higher on both and lowered down to 100. I'm not sure how I would explain the difference? Its subtle. To me my mics sound warmer around 100. Pushing it higher (600+) and there seems to be more detail and the volume seems to increase slightly. I think I prefer the warmer effect if that's what you call it?

Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,145
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,145
I used those mics as a reference because their reported impedance is lower than a lot of them.

"Rated impedance is 150Ω (310Ω actual) for connection to microphone inputs rated low impedance"

The others probably appear louder and clearer when higher because that is the impedance they expect.
Starving a mic is different than giving it too much, so the two mics you used and the two mics I mentioned would likely show different results to the ear.

So many SM-57 and 58's out there still in use, but many interfaces do not have a way to adjust for them.
I have a separate preamp that works just fine, and if I insert it before the interface it's fine. But having an interface that did it in the first place is a nice feature.
That said, my Preamp also offers the additive tube feature .. so works a treat on other stuff as well.

If that ART has an 'instrument' in switch, may be fun to se what your guitar or bass sounds like through it.


I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Band-in-a-Box 2025 Italian Version is Here!

Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.

Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.

Band-in-a-Box 2025 - Italiano
RealBand 2025 - Italiano

Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!

Bonjour à tous,

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music

Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:

BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation

Voilà, enjoy!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!

Die deutsche Version Band-in-a-Box® 2025 für Windows ist ab sofort verfügbar!

Alle die bereits die englische Version von Band-in-a-Box und RealBand 2024 installiert haben, finden hier die Installationsdateien für das Sprachenupdate:

https://nn.pgmusic.com/pgfiles/languagesupport/deutsch2025.exe
https://nn.pgmusic.com/pgfiles/languagesupport/deutsch2025RB.exe

Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!

Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.

Stay up to date—get the latest update now!

Update to RealBand® 2025 Build 5 Windows Today!

Already using RealBand® 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 5 now from our Support Page to ensure you have the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.

Get the latest update today!

PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 for Windows is Here!

PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 is here! This new version introduces many features, including VST3 support, the ability to load or import a .FLAC file, a reset option for track height in the Tracks window, a taller Timeline on the Notation window toolbar, new freeze buttons in the Tracks window, three toolbar modes (two rows, single row, and none), the improved Select Patch dialog with text-based search and numeric patch display, a new button in the DirectX/VST window to copy an effects group, and more!

First-time packages start at only $49. Already a PowerTracks Pro Audio user? Upgrade for as little as $29!

www.pgmusic.com/powertracks.htm

Video: Summary of the New Band-in-a-Box® App for iOS®

Join Tobin as he takes you on a tour of the new Band-in-a-Box® app for iOS®! Designed for musicians, singer-songwriters, and educators, this powerful tool lets you create, play, and transfer songs effortlessly on your iPhone® or iPad®—anytime, anywhere.

Band-in-a-Box® for iOS® :Summary video.

Check out the forum post for more information.

Forum Statistics
Forums58
Topics84,143
Posts775,275
Members39,567
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
Newest Members
RickyLane, greypeter1, AudioQuestions, jl1, DKL
39,567 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 185
DC Ron 103
rsdean 95
WaoBand 93
BYOBand 68
dcuny 67
Noel96 66
Today's Birthdays
Saxfred
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5