Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 54
Enthusiast
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 54 |
Perhaps this has been fixed in version 2012: The splitting of the clefs when printing is wrong. C4 = Middle C, not C5. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C_%28musical_note%29It may seem like a minor thing until you want to specify the clef.
Last edited by TromboneAl; 01/11/12 04:05 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,491
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,491 |
BIAB 2012 has SAME "description" pop-up. And as far as I can tell it's just an EXAMPLE description. That is, "if you SET middle C to C5" [in the split Clef at box] then that's where Clef's split occur? I assume it's to accommodate folks who DO NOT have HW with C4 as Middle C or who want other than C4 as their middle C for whatever reason.
Of course I can see that this would be a problem for you if your print does NOT PRINT correctly based on what IS set there?
I have a Yamaha Motif XS7 and Middle C on it is C3 (and range is from C-2 through G8) not C4. However, my Alesis's (QS8 and Fusion) both have Middle C at C4. I don't think Alesis is right and Yamaha wrong (or vice versa) because MIDI spec suggests that C4 be middle C - but it doesn't require/enforce it (AFAIK but middle C for any given synth SHOULD be NOTE number 60).
Larry
Last edited by Larry Kehl; 01/11/12 04:43 PM.
Win10Pro,i9,64GB,2TBSSD+20TBHDDs,1080TI,BIAB'24,Scarlett18i8,Montage7,Fusion 8HD,QS8,Integra7,XV5080,QSR,SC-8850,SPLAT,FL21&others,Komp.14,IK suite&others, just a guitar player-AXE FX III &FM9T, FishmanTP, MIDIGuitar2, GK2/3'sw/GI20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 19,806
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 19,806 |
Al, My understanding with the C0, C1, etc., notation is that there is no standard. A person is free to define middle C however s/he wants. I believe that Sonar also define middle C as C5. A comparison that springs to mind is that the scientific scale for measuring temperature is Kelvin. That doesn't stop people from using Celsius, Centigrade or Fahrenheit, though. The reason the print options are set to C4 (the octave below middle C) is so that notes below middle C will print on the lead sheet as treble clef using ledger lines rather. At least, that's my interpretation. Below is an article about midi note numbers and how different manufacturers reference the numbering system differently. http://tomscarff.110mb.com/midi_analyser/midi_note_numbers_for_octaves.htmRegards, Noel
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,778
PG Music Staff
|
PG Music Staff
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,778 |
We call Middle C "C5", as do some other companies (eg Cakewalk) http://forum.cakewalk.com/tm.aspx?m=671372The problem with using C4 is that it leaves the lowest octave as C -1, which implies a note number less than zero. The lowest MIDI note number is 0 - it seems somehow more natural to call that C0 instead of C -1 Also, middle C is note 60, and C5 makes sense because 5x12= 60 I'm not expecting anyone to change their opinion on this, im just explaining why we have called middle C C5 for 23 years. Other companies use C4 or C3 so it is a mess.
Have Fun! Peter Gannon PG Music Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,491
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,491 |
Not to beat a dead horse (given the people I work with my colleagues and I have a saying: "there is no horse so dead it can't be beat some more" :-D ) and to show Peter's description better (with a picture!) go to: http://www.midisolutions.com/chapter3.htmscoot on down the page to "NOTE NUMBERING VS. NOTE NAMING" and read Larry
Win10Pro,i9,64GB,2TBSSD+20TBHDDs,1080TI,BIAB'24,Scarlett18i8,Montage7,Fusion 8HD,QS8,Integra7,XV5080,QSR,SC-8850,SPLAT,FL21&others,Komp.14,IK suite&others, just a guitar player-AXE FX III &FM9T, FishmanTP, MIDIGuitar2, GK2/3'sw/GI20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 54
Enthusiast
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 54 |
OK, thanks. I'm glad to know that there is some thought behind this, and it's not just a stupid error that no one has bothered to correct.
It's ridiculous that there isn't a consistent way to refer to a note, but I can see now that it's not PG Music's fault.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Way back when the MIDI standard was agreed upon, there weren't *any* 88-key MIDI instruments...
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,013
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,013 |
Mac
There was the Yamaha KX88 controller keyboard - but I can't remember what the middle c convention was on it.
The KX88 was available at about the same time as the DX7 and was designed to be teamed up with the TX 816 and the QX 1 sequencer. A monster system!!
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Quote:
Mac
There was the Yamaha KX88 controller keyboard - but I can't remember what the middle c convention was on it.
The KX88 was available at about the same time as the DX7 and was designed to be teamed up with the TX 816 and the QX 1 sequencer. A monster system!!
Kevin
Yes, indeed. But the actual MIDI standard was agreed upon before either keyboard was a production reality...
And since the puters and controllers cannot accept a negative number for the bottom octave, as Peter has stated, very likely it had to use C5 as well.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,013
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,013 |
Mac
If I remember correctly - midi was a really mixed bag of tricks even when the DX7 & KX88 were introduced. Obviously most of the protocol was bashed out but still some manufacturers read their own version of MIDI.
I had a studio right in the middle of this time (1984 - 1990) and slowly things got midied - but I remember being frustrated by a lack of standard between Yamaha, Roland and Korg of which the bulk of my equipment was manufactured by.
It wasn't until the 90's that you could buy a piece of equipment and be reasonably sure that it would integrate itself into your studio. Of course then came computers and the MPU-401 and Cakewalk for DOS and the whole problem of where middle c occurred cropped up. BIAB was there in the melee with 'drums and bass' tracks and a whole 16 styles.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
My viewpoint is that anything MIDI has *always* been a "mixed bag of tricks".
It is possible to have two differing parameters that both meet the old MIDI spec.
Figure that.
Then there is the fact that Yamaha insisted on using the old Japanese convention of starting with zero and having zero count as one. Figure THAT...
But it is what it is and given all that, I still have managed to take darn good advantage of the power of MIDI over the years, in studio and onstage.
Remember when our keyboard choices were few and all of 'em quite large in size?
And all of 'em were literally one trick ponies as well...
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box 2025 Italian Version is Here!
Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.
Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.
Band-in-a-Box 2025 - Italiano
RealBand 2025 - Italiano
Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!
Bonjour à tous,
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music
Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:
BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation
Voilà, enjoy!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!
Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!
Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
Stay up to date—get the latest update now!
Update to RealBand® 2025 Build 5 Windows Today!
Already using RealBand® 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 5 now from our Support Page to ensure you have the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
Get the latest update today!
PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 for Windows is Here!
PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 is here! This new version introduces many features, including VST3 support, the ability to load or import a .FLAC file, a reset option for track height in the Tracks window, a taller Timeline on the Notation window toolbar, new freeze buttons in the Tracks window, three toolbar modes (two rows, single row, and none), the improved Select Patch dialog with text-based search and numeric patch display, a new button in the DirectX/VST window to copy an effects group, and more!
First-time packages start at only $49. Already a PowerTracks Pro Audio user? Upgrade for as little as $29!
www.pgmusic.com/powertracks.htm
Video: Summary of the New Band-in-a-Box® App for iOS®
Join Tobin as he takes you on a tour of the new Band-in-a-Box® app for iOS®! Designed for musicians, singer-songwriters, and educators, this powerful tool lets you create, play, and transfer songs effortlessly on your iPhone® or iPad®—anytime, anywhere.
Band-in-a-Box® for iOS® :Summary video.
Check out the forum post for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,085
Posts775,211
Members39,585
|
Most Online25,754 Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|