Rikki, the LAME encoder is better in audio quality anyway.

The Audacity homepage has a place where you can just download and install LAME encoder and not the Audacity program if you like. I would recommend downloading and installing both anyway, as Audacity is very handy program to have. Both are free.

I use Audacity for making mp3 files most of the time as it also has the ability to add all that imbedded data such as copyright, artist, etc. - it also gives me a chance to do a bit of heads and tails editing of the audio .wav file at the same time, clipping off the stick taps at the beginning, also the "Amplify" plugin can be very handey and it is fairly automatic in settings, good way to get that volume "up to snuff" before saving as mp3.


The reason the LAME encoder now sounds better is that Fraunhofer stopped development of their mp3 codecs some time back but the LAME project kept right on working on things. Or at least, that's the scuttlebutt I've read on the web about the issue. All I know is that I did some A/B comparisons and to my ears I settled on the LAME encoder over any others available at the time.


--Mac

PGmusic FAQs, Tutorials and Updates! click here

You must be Audiominds.
www.audiominds.com