|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 49
Enthusiast
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 49 |
Hi,
I know this is not the solution we are looking for; however, the quickest way I have found to find that "perfect" part is to use the Audition button in the Stylepicker window.
I believe you can mute parts before going into Stylepicker (I don't have access to my BIAB right now so cannot verify this).
With this work around I can generally move fairly quickly through styles and then create my hybrid.
Hope this helps while we await the solution from PG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,493
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,493 |
Bob "Notes" Norton  Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com
100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,598
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,598 |
Latest BIAB version, latest build.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 188
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 188 |
THANKS - YOUR EXAMPLE NAILS DOWN THE PROBLEM VERY ACCURATELY.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,323
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,323 |
Take also in consideration that the new stylepicker don't include the user styles or 3rd party styles. that is a pity, because user styles are created to add sepcific styles or patterns not present in BIAB styles. I have issued a post in the wihslist forum some weeks ago to ask for a stylepikcer that would include ALL the styles present in BIAB directory, that is BIAB styles plus 3rd party styles.
Reach for excellence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 733
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 733 |
I have been using BIAB for well over ten years and still use it for it's original purpose - to provide a quick and easy accompaniment for my keyboard playing. I have very little musical knowledge and quite frankly not a lot of creativity and the beauty of BIAB is that you don't need much of either because the basic MIDI styles have always given me what I needed. I don't have the necessary skill or desire to get into the style maker or into Realband - there must be hundreds of users like me.
When RDs came along it was a simple extra that gave an option that added to the overall sound and more importantly was a simple substitution within the basic MIDI style. When RTs came along things started to change and the program started to concentrate on a more professional kind of user. It took me a while to realize that the Realstyles weren't of much use to me because most of them were fairly boring styles with the addition of a solo. Even the improvement in sound didn't really excite me as I am perfectly happy with the sound from my SD50 synth. I would much rather have more choice of exciting ready made styles than have to cope with the complexity of building my own styles from the different RTs. I have learned to cope with the problems of needing a better computer, RT load time and the need to freeze everything. But for me to really use RTs I need 5 instrument Realstyles without solos, (I will add my own) that are as varied as MIDI styles.
Don't get me wrong, I am full of admiration for those profesionals who can produce wonderful results with BIAB, Realband and other DAWs and PG must cater to these users but it's just that PG shouldn't lose sight of their roots and need to keep an eye on the MIDI crowd and users like me. Recently I have turned to Bob Norton's styles as a way of keeping things fresh.
Regards
Tony
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,493
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,493 |
I must respectfully disagree.
Professional musicians generally prefer the MIDI tracks. Why? Many reasons, but mostly because they are editable.
It's impractical to impossible to edit a real track, change a note, get rid of something that might conflict with the melody, add a song-specific part and change anything in the RT that conflicts with that part, refine kicks/licks etc.
Most professional musicians have good synthesizers, instead of the cheesy sounds on the 99 cent synth chip on the computer's sound card.
Pros know that to the audience, expression, the parts, the song itself is much more important than the finer points of tone.
From the feedback I get on my site, the professionals overwhelming prefer the MIDI styles.
Insights and incites by Notes ♫
Bob "Notes" Norton Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com
100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,610
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,610 |
I think we've had this conversation before. I'm a jazz pianist, been using BIAB since 1995. I don't do "cover" music, which MIDI is well suited for. There must be many thousands like me who were ecstatic when RD and RT came out. When you do A-B comparisons, the choice is clear for those whose main musical thing is improvising. Just my side of this thread. Later, Ray
P.S. I'm a "professional" also.
Last edited by raymb1; 05/11/11 06:56 AM.
Asus Q500A i7 Win 10 64 bit 8GB ram 750 HD 15.5" touch screen, BIAB 2017, Casio PX 5s, Xw P1, Center Point Stereo SS V3 and EWI 4000s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
I'm an amateur who doesn't understand the either/or exclusivity of this thing.
So I use what does the job at hand best and have fun.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,944
PG Music Staff
|
|
PG Music Staff
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,944 |
>>> It's impractical to impossible to edit a real track, change a note, get rid of something that might conflict with the melody, add a song-specific part and change anything in the RT that conflicts with that part, refine kicks/licks etc. Hi Bob, You ** can ** replace BB generated parts (RealTracks or MIDI ) with song specific parts, using the standard MIDI synth that comes with BB. There is a video and audio demoing this in the Tips and Tricks section here http://www.pgmusic.com/forums/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=316518&an=0&page=0#Post316518
Have Fun!
Peter Gannon
PG Music Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 188
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 188 |
Like Mac I am another amateur - I would like to see both expanded and improved. When I do a new tune I look at all possibilities from BIAB and Midi and try to use the best for each step or part. I mix and match midi, real tracks and BIAB tracks plus live audio to produce the best final result. In general RTs are good for many jazz tunes (I am primarily a jazz guitarist)and midi or BIAB are best for pop rock but I find many exceptions. I recently did some country tunes and found that RTs for country are fantastic. As a along term user I hope that MIDI and RTs receive near equal attention for future development. A real good style part picker for both would top my list. If you are exclusive to either you are not getting your money's worth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,697
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,697 |
Quote:
Like Mac I am another amateur
Mac has his tongue firmly planted in his cheek, he is far from an amateur. 31,894 posts is your first clue.
Bob
Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,026
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,026 |
Why not teach us how to make RTracks for use in BIAB, from what I've heard here ,PG users have some pretty good chops. I love the edit-ability of midi and I have tons of software synths to get the sounds needed ,but nothing sounds like a real instrument except a real instrument.(Sorry Bob I disagree with you on that) Every one who has heard my newest RT based tunes said they were glad I dumped the midi crap and used a real band . That'll be my little secret .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,926
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,926 |
Quote:
"I dumped the midi crap and used a real band."
Andere Freude fũr andere Leute.
"My primary musical instrument is the personal computer."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,551
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,551 |
I’m finding this tread very interesting as many of us are either anti-midi or anti-RTs/RDs. I, like Mac and some others, use whatever sounds the best for the song I’m working on. However I seem to be 180 degrees out of phase with many!
Let me explain. I use mostly midi for my original music. The ratio is about 90 percent midi and 10% RTs. I very rarely use RDs on my originals. I can manipulate midi parts far more easily than I can RTs. I also have some very good sounding sound sources. Sound sources, I believe is the secret for midi. If you are using an inexpensive GM or MS midi sound source than RTs will always sound better no matter how much midi tweaking you do! With good sound sources there is not that much difference. However they do cost a lot of money.
Now I use mostly RTs/RDs with covers! Note that I do not believe in doing covers exactly like the original. If I did that then why would anyone listen to me when they can play the record/CD. I have a couple of clients who love singing old country standards for their friends and families. RTs/RDs are a God sent! I no longer have to generate/play midi parts anymore. I just use RTs/RDs and I can produce a pro quality song in minutes. They are extremely happy with the results, as am I. Note that I would love to send up an example however I respect the forum’s no cover song rule.
So the bottom line is use whatever works best for you but don’t put down the other side! Midi, RTs, and RDs should work side by side and neither is always perfect or always not perfect.
Just my two cents.
Back in my day the only time we started panic buying was when the bartender shouted "last call"!
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
I am indeed an amateur. Problem here is that people have redefined for themselves what the word means. "Amateur" -- From the French, meaning literally "love of the craft". "Professional" -- From Latin and possibly Greek roots, one meaning of which is merely someone who got paid to do the job over a period of time. For my trety on the subject, taken from an Audiominds post and into posterity by another member, visit the link below and read the rant. "What's an Amateur?" --Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,840
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,840 |
I love having both MIDI and RealTracks/RealDrums available to me. It makes for a much more complete toolbox with which to craft music. Why limit yourself to only one or the other?
Since RealTracks can't follow notation, then I must rely on MIDI to render specific phrases; however, RealTracks give me some very interesting accompaniment. I know some people have complained that things start repeating (soundwise) after awhile, but remember RealTracks are still pretty new. Several years down the road, once we have tens of thousands of RealTracks to choose from, there will be plenty to keep it interesting.
I know people who play specific instruments will always complain that the rendition just isn't right. That's great if you're playing for other musicians. I'm in the camp, however, that finds if the audience enjoys the music, they don't really care about technical possibilities. I've never heard anyone ever say, "Wow...that sounded really cool, but you can't really do that on [insert instrument here], so I guess I can't like it."
RealTracks give me cool solo lines, but so does the BIAB soloist and melodist. Whatever works! I also find on some songs I use RealDrums, on others, I still use MIDI. And sometimes, I augment the RealDrums with MIDI percussion instruments.
That being said, I would like to see additional MIDI styles. What would really be cool would be if PGMusic provided a "style converter" that took Yamaha styles, Korg styles, Casio styles, Kurzweil styles, etc into BIAB styles. I have tons of downloaded styles that are just begging to be "BIAB-ified". Obviously, you're not going to get all the nuances that those instruments provide within their sound engines, but just getting the notes and riffs in place is a good start. I'm sure there are copyright issues, but license fees can overcome that.
John Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 12TB SSD Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 12TB SATA BB2026/UMC204HD&404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/Notion/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK http://www.sus4chord.com (under rehosting/construction)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 733
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 733 |
Quote:
That being said, I would like to see additional MIDI styles
That's my point exactly.
It's not a question of MIDI vs RD/RT, just keep the right balance between the two by issuing more MIDI styles. There are so many already that it might take some effort to come up styles that are original and fresh.
Also why are so many of the styles with RTs just a simple style with a track devoted to a solo RT? There seem to be far more interesting all MIDI styles.
Tony
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
PowerTracks Pro 2026 for Windows is Here!
PowerTracks 2026 is here—bringing powerful new enhancements designed to make your production workflow faster, smoother, and more intuitive than ever.
The enhanced Mixer now shows Track Type and Instrument icons for instant track recognition, while a new grid option simplifies editing views. Non-floating windows adopt a modern title bar style, replacing the legacy blue bar.
The Master Volume is now applied at the end of the audio chain for consistent levels and full-signal master effects.
Tablature now includes a “Save bends when saving XML” option for improved compatibility with PG Music tools. Plus, you can instantly match all track heights with a simple Ctrl-release after resizing, and Add2 chords from MGU/SGU files are now fully supported... and more!
Get started today—first-time packages start at just $49.
Already using PowerTracks Pro Audio? Upgrade for as little as $29 and enjoy the latest improvements!
Order now!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!
Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!
We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.
Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!
Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.
If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!
Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!
We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
Happy New Year!
Thank you for being part of the Band-in-a-Box® community.
Wishing you and yours a very happy 2026—Happy New Year from all of us at PG Music!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,078
Posts799,801
Members40,028
| |
Most Online44,367
Mar 4th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean