|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 15
Enthusiast
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 15 |
Howdy Folks, should you always normalize your tracks in BIAB and RB before mastering? I've tried mastering normalized tracks and not normalized tracks and the final output doesn't seem to have much difference (not that I can tell)--the volume and overall sound is more or less the same, after applying mastering compression. Is there a reason to normalize tracks before mixing/mastering? Or it doesn't matter?
Thanks, J
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021 |
I do but I'm old school were you wanted all your tracks on tape to be as hot as possible. Less noise that way.With digital it doesn't really matter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 15
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 15 |
Quote:
I do but I'm old school were you wanted all your tracks on tape to be as hot as possible. Less noise that way.With digital it doesn't really matter.
Hi John, Thanks for the info. Tons more to learn! J
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 235
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 235 |
When you normalize a track, it moves all the audio samples in the file up by the same amount, so that the highest sample value is at or near the maximum allowed (0 dB) (or the level you specify). If your peak sample is already near that, then there won't be any noticeable increase in volume. If the peak sample started at -6 dB, and you normalized to 0 dB, then you'd get a 6 dB gain in volume that would be noticeable.
If you were going to get a file professionally mastered, they want the peaks at around -3 dB, not at the maximum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,165
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,165 |
So one thing to point out is that when you raise the whole track 6dB (as in Hog Time's example) you are also rasing the noise floor by that amount. That is something to listen for.
Whether you normalize everything is up to you, although once you do it means starting the mixing process all over again, because one track may have been increased 18dB and another only 2.
The time to get the good levels is during the recording process so the signal-to-noise ratio is good and the convertors are getting a good strong signal to work with.
For what it's worth I don't normalize every track. I rarely normalize any tracks, but will use the gain change plugin if a track needs it. A lot of realdrum tracks seem to need a little boost I've noticed.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021 |
Quote:
So one thing to point out is that when you raise the whole track 6dB (as in Hog Time's example) you are also rasing the noise floor by that amount. That is something to listen for.
Whether you normalize everything is up to you, although once you do it means starting the mixing process all over again, because one track may have been increased 18dB and another only 2.
The time to get the good levels is during the recording process so the signal-to-noise ratio is good and the convertors are getting a good strong signal to work with.
For what it's worth I don't normalize every track. I rarely normalize any tracks, but will use the gain change plugin if a track needs it. A lot of realdrum tracks seem to need a little boost I've noticed.
Agree. I just didn't say it quite right.I meant I usually normalizes all RTs & Rds.Self recorded tracks are done hot to start.This is all done before the mix.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 707
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 707 |
It also depends on the Real Track. Some of the newer electric guitar parts are already pretty compressed and "hot", so you won't hear a lot of difference.
One thing to bear in mind is that, if you are recording your own parts as well for use in RB, Sonar or whatever, you might be better off normalising in those programmes, or just using the faders the old fashioned way except with automation(!), as, if the RTs are already very hot, you might find that, if you have to use shed loads of gain on your own parts to match them, you will end up with a lot of noise as well. You can hide this within a distorted electric guitar part, but it is harder to remove from your own vocal, acoustic guitar or whatever. Generally, I wouldn't ever normalise in BAIB for that reason. I tend to normalise in Sonar and either use the fader or apply gain to the part in small increments till it sounds right. It takes about 5 minutes more, but you end up with better balanced parts. Just my view ...
Brian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,502 |
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB 2025, Realband, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 9 32c , Melodyne 5 editor, Presonus Audiobox 1818VSL, Presonus control app.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,165
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,165 |
I liked the article, the only comment I have is to partially disagree with their statement "Normalizing is indistinguishable from moving a volume knob or fader." Sliders and knobs in DAWs only reduce a track from it's peak volume downward. Setting all sliders all the way up only stops any reduction from taking place. Now if it were inside a different setup where the track could have an amplification source, I would pretty much agree. But then we wouldn't be discussing normalization. 
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815 |
I would say never normalize individual tracks. I think the volumes of the tracks should be determined by the mix itself. Normalizing each individual track has to lead to a dull, muddy mix. If all tracks become louder, then the final master bus will require more compression to keep the whole thing from clipping (although, in reality, I have no idea what I am talking about).
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 95
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 95 |
Quote:
Sliders and knobs in DAWs only reduce a track from it's peak volume downward. Setting all sliders all the way up only stops any reduction from taking place.
In my DAW I can raise the level with faders (going over 0.0).
edit: oh sorry - I think I do know now how this was meant. But at least we have the gain control at the very beginning of each channel or one could apply a gain plug helping out if there's no such input gain control. I would strongly recommend never to maximize tracks nor to go over -12 to -6 peak on 16 bit tracks. It strongly depends on what plugins one uses on the tracks and on what level they operate best. -18 db is the equivalent of 0 on a VU meter in the analog world.
Here's some in-depth information by one of the most accomplished engineers in the field (Paul Frindle). I suggest starting to read at post #71 (in the upper right hand corner) and if you're interested I would strongly recommend reading all the posts made by Paul Frindle in this long thread. VERY insightful.
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/so-much-g...restored-3.html
BTW: ITB just means "In The Box" which means on a computer DAW as opposed to analogue OTB (Out Of The Box) gear. It took me a while to get this first.
Cheers, Daniel
"Plugins use the same reference at real equipment. Never try and drive them to the top of the Digital scale. Don't try and make your mix look like a master. You don't do that on an analog console, so why do we do it ITB?
"if your production environment dictates that you must provide limited, maximised and level-blasted material, just do it at the end"
Last edited by deltagolf; 03/10/11 03:40 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,165
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,165 |
That was fun reading,
Thanks
I'm going to try the X-ISM meter suggested, I have been using Parmeter for that purpose usually. I like how it keeps a record of the various ways to read levels for you.
Last edited by rharv; 03/10/11 09:06 AM.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 450
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 450 |
Hi rharv, Quote:
For what it's worth I don't normalize every track. I rarely normalize any tracks, but will use the gain change plugin if a track needs it. A lot of realdrum tracks seem to need a little boost I've noticed.
What gain change plugin do you use?
Col
iMac, 3.7 GHz 6-Core Intel Core i5, BIAB MAC2024 (802), Audient iD4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,165
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,165 |
I was referring to RB, lost track of which forum I was in, apparently.
edit-audio effects-gain change
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 450
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 450 |
Quote:
I was referring to RB, lost track of which forum I was in, apparently.
edit-audio effects-gain change
Hi rharv,
That's what I assumed. So when you say you don't "normalize", do you just untick the "pre normalize" check box, that comes on automatically when you select "boost" from the edit-audio effects-gain change-boost dropdown?
Col
iMac, 3.7 GHz 6-Core Intel Core i5, BIAB MAC2024 (802), Audient iD4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,165
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,165 |
Yes, then set the decibels I want. Safe to leave the post limit checkbox.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 450
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 450 |
Thanks for the advice rharv, much appreciated.
iMac, 3.7 GHz 6-Core Intel Core i5, BIAB MAC2024 (802), Audient iD4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,119
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,119 |
Quote:
I would say never normalize individual tracks. I think the volumes of the tracks should be determined by the mix itself. Normalizing each individual track has to lead to a dull, muddy mix. If all tracks become louder, then the final master bus will require more compression to keep the whole thing from clipping (although, in reality, I have no idea what I am talking about).
Kevin
+ 1
Trax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,216
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,216 |
Quote:
Quote:
I would say never normalize individual tracks. I think the volumes of the tracks should be determined by the mix itself. Normalizing each individual track has to lead to a dull, muddy mix. If all tracks become louder, then the final master bus will require more compression to keep the whole thing from clipping (although, in reality, I have no idea what I am talking about).
Kevin
+ 1
Trax
Another +1
Whenever I get something stuck in the back of my throat, I dislodge it by drinking a beer.
It's called the Heineken Maneuver.
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
I can't tell you whether or not to do something like this for the simple reason that I cannot HEAR your tracks.
In other words, they maybe could stand a bit of Normalization, perhaps only one or two of them might, or perhaps the composite might benefit from one single Normalization pass, or then again perhaps Normalization is not the proper tool at all for that particular set of tracks and we may elect to use an instance of Compression, again maybe only on some of the separate tracks, also maybe a Mastering Pass with the Compressor as well.
It may seem to be the easier path, looking for blanket recipes or routines that will deliver the magic goodstuff every time, but quite honestly I do not know of anything like that which can compete with trained mind, ears, knowledge, experience, measurement tools and time. YMMV -- and so will your sonic results.
That said, if you are using Realtracks, the hard truth is that they need very little massaging to sound good, the pgmusic demos are done and posted "as-is" right out of BiaB.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins
Join the conversation on our forum.
Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll also keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
From overviews of new features and walkthroughs of the 202 new RealTracks, to highlights of XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAKs 18, the 2025 49-PAK, and in-depth tutorials — you’ll find everything you need to explore what’s new in Band-in-a-Box® 2025.
Reference this forum post for One-Stop Shopping of our Band-in-a-Box® 2025 Mac Videos — we’ll be adding more videos as they’re released!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac is here, packed with major new features and an incredible collection of available new content! This includes 202 RealTracks (in Sets 449-467), plus 20 bonus Unreleased RealTracks in the 2025 49-PAK. There are new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 4, two new sets of “RealDrums Stems,” XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAK 19, and more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac with savings of up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special—available until July 31, 2025! Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
2025 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
We've packed our Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK with some incredible Add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is automatically included with most Band-in-a-Box® for Mac 2025 packages, but for even more Add-ons (including 20 Unreleased RealTracks!) upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49. You can see the full lists of items in each package, and listen to demos here.
If you have any questions, feel free to connect with us directly—we’re here to help!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 Italian Version is Here!
Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.
Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.
Band-in-a-Box 2025 - Italiano
RealBand 2025 - Italiano
Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!
Bonjour à tous,
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music
Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:
BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation
Voilà, enjoy!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!
Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!
Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
Stay up to date—get the latest update now!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,304
Posts777,518
Members39,612
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean